Linux-PHY Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	olteanv@gmail.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 11/11] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Remove regmap R/W wrapper functions
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:55:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707085542.017B71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707083730.33977-12-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The reference count of the parent SPMI device obtained via `spmi_find_device_by_of_node()` is never dropped, causing a memory and device reference leak.
- [Low] Type mismatch in `iadc_probe`: returning `ERR_PTR(-ENODEV)` instead of `-ENODEV`.
--

--- Patch [11]: [PATCH v10 11/11] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Remove regmap R/W wrapper functions ---
commit 2cc2678cec6d923731a39311dff1c18e6f022adf
Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Remove regmap R/W wrapper functions

This commit simplifies the driver by removing custom regmap read/write
wrappers and directly calling the regmap APIs. It also migrates the driver
to register as a SPMI subdevice to handle the base address internally.

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-iadc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-iadc.c
> index ad66bb92fe19c..84c2bd27367fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-iadc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-iadc.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -511,7 +488,10 @@ static int iadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	iadc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  	iadc->dev = dev;
>  
> -	sparent = to_spmi_device(dev->parent);
> +	sparent = spmi_find_device_by_of_node(dev->parent->of_node);

[Severity: High]
Does this leak the device reference?

spmi_find_device_by_of_node() returns a device with its reference count
incremented, but it doesn't appear that put_device() is ever called to
release it within iadc_probe() on either the success or error paths.

> +	if (!sparent)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);

[Severity: Low]
Does this need to return -ENODEV directly instead of using ERR_PTR()?

Since iadc_probe() returns an int, returning ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) causes a type
mismatch and a compiler warning.

> +
>  	sub_sdev = devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add(dev, sparent);
>  	if (IS_ERR(sub_sdev))
>  		return PTR_ERR(sub_sdev);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707083730.33977-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com?part=11

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07  8:37 [PATCH v10 00/11] SPMI: Implement sub-devices and migrate drivers AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 01/11] spmi: Fix potential use-after-free by grabbing of_node reference AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  9:07   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 02/11] spmi: Remove redundant dev_name() print in spmi_device_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 03/11] spmi: Print error status with %pe format AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 04/11] spmi: Remove unneeded goto in spmi_device_add() error path AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 05/11] spmi: Implement spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() and devm variant AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 06/11] nvmem: qcom-spmi-sdam: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 07/11] power: reset: qcom-pon: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 08/11] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 09/11] misc: qcom-coincell: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 10/11] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  9:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  8:37 ` [PATCH v10 11/11] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Remove regmap R/W wrapper functions AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07  8:55   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260707085542.017B71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox