From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/11] misc: qcom-coincell: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:56:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707085644.C03841F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707083730.33977-10-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Leaked device reference count for the parent SPMI device acquired via spmi_find_device_by_of_node().
- [Low] Returning a pointer (`ERR_PTR(-ENODEV)`) from a function with an `int` return type.
--
--- Patch [9]: [PATCH v10 09/11] misc: qcom-coincell: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() ---
commit d4a4d2ba5d9e18044bfae04039df8731e13ea2f2
Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
misc: qcom-coincell: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
This commit migrates the coincell charger driver to use the new
devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() API. It registers a new SPMI
sub-device and initializes its own regmap.
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c b/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c
> index 3c57f74291476..46340f0199cdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -71,37 +71,58 @@ static int qcom_coincell_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
[ ... ]
> - rc = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &chgr.base_addr);
> + rc = device_property_read_u32(dev, "reg", &qcom_coincell_regmap_config.reg_base);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> + sparent = spmi_find_device_by_of_node(dev->parent->of_node);
> + if (!sparent)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
[Severity: Low]
The qcom_coincell_probe() function returns an int, but ERR_PTR(-ENODEV)
constructs a pointer. Will this cause a compiler error for implicit
pointer-to-integer conversion?
[Severity: Medium]
The spmi_find_device_by_of_node() function acquires a reference to the parent
SPMI device. Since devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() does not consume this
reference, does this code leak the device reference by never calling
put_device() to release it?
These same return type mismatches and reference leaks also appear to be
present in the probe functions for qcom-spmi-sdam.c, qcom-pon.c, and
phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c introduced by this patchset.
> +
> + sub_sdev = devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add(dev, sparent);
> + if (IS_ERR(sub_sdev))
> + return PTR_ERR(sub_sdev);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707083730.33977-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com?part=9
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 8:37 [PATCH v10 00/11] SPMI: Implement sub-devices and migrate drivers AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 01/11] spmi: Fix potential use-after-free by grabbing of_node reference AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 9:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 02/11] spmi: Remove redundant dev_name() print in spmi_device_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 03/11] spmi: Print error status with %pe format AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 04/11] spmi: Remove unneeded goto in spmi_device_add() error path AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 05/11] spmi: Implement spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() and devm variant AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 06/11] nvmem: qcom-spmi-sdam: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 07/11] power: reset: qcom-pon: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 08/11] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 09/11] misc: qcom-coincell: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 10/11] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 9:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 11/11] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Remove regmap R/W wrapper functions AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:55 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707085644.C03841F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox