Linux-PHY Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@kernel.org>
To: George Neacsu <geocausa@gmail.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>,
	Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Nihal Kumar Gupta <nihal.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Vikram Sharma <vikram.sharma@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Suresh Vankadara <svankada@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	tjose@qti.qualcomm.com,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: C-PHY for X1E80100
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 14:27:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efe328a8-83d7-48bc-bf45-90f3535e2657@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016113259.40819-1-geocausa@gmail.com>

On 16/10/2026 12:32, George Neacsu wrote:
>>> The kernel was 7.1.5, with linux-next's CAMSS and CSI2 PHY built as
>>> modules; the test build needed shims only for API differences.
>> What's this ?
>>
>> "It builds" I can verify myself, "it works" is the thing. Just slow down
>> and get something you can test on hardware.
> Fair point. The frames in the cover letter were captured on the
> hardware, but the kernel underneath was the 7.1.5 one this machine runs
> day to day, with linux-next's CAMSS and CSI2 PHY sources built as modules
> for it. That is not the same as running linux-next. Before v3 I will
> boot an actual linux-next kernel on the Surface Pro 11, retest both
> cameras there, and say exactly what was run.
> 
> For 4/4 I will also move the fsleep() change into its own patch with the
> reasoning, and put the lanes_enable() decomposition in a precursor
> patch, as you asked. Thanks for the reviews of 2/4 and 3/4.
> 
> Thanks,
> George

The bit I'm a bit alarmed about is "stuff was stubbed" which makes me 
wonder if what lands in -next can then said to be actually verified 
meaningfully.

Could you git rebase linux-stable/master for your 7.1.5 tree maybe ?

---
bod

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <K9h_NQSPlrzzoVDIqqNPGT6KDZNScVi2mlqy6yNs8VOOS_I4KXf0QLy4k3Cwo2qKhnfL_qUK5wnY4h6wX24L4A==@protonmail.internalid>
2026-10-16 10:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: C-PHY for X1E80100 George Neacsu via B4 Relay
2026-10-16 10:57   ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] phy: Add MIPI C-PHY mode and configuration options George Neacsu via B4 Relay
2026-10-16 11:04     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 11:35     ` Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-10-16 14:16     ` Loic Poulain
2026-10-16 10:57   ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] phy: Add MIPI C-PHY configuration helpers George Neacsu via B4 Relay
2026-10-16 11:06     ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-10-16 10:57   ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: Rename the D-PHY init sequence George Neacsu via B4 Relay
2026-10-16 11:07     ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-10-16 10:57   ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: Add C-PHY support for X1E80100 George Neacsu via B4 Relay
2026-10-16 11:15     ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-10-16 11:35     ` Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-10-16 12:05       ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-10-16 12:25         ` Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-10-16 12:24     ` David Heidelberg
2026-10-16 11:02   ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: C-PHY " Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-10-16 11:32     ` George Neacsu
2026-10-16 13:27       ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]
2026-10-16 14:55         ` George Neacsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efe328a8-83d7-48bc-bf45-90f3535e2657@kernel.org \
    --to=bod@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@ixit.cz \
    --cc=geocausa@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=nihal.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=svankada@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=tjose@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=vikram.sharma@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox