* [vireshk:cpufreq/stats/cleanups 12/14] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2014-12-19 8:17 kbuild test robot
2014-12-19 8:17 ` [PATCH vireshk] cpufreq: stats: cpufreq_stats_lock can be static kbuild test robot
2014-12-19 8:21 ` [vireshk:cpufreq/stats/cleanups 12/14] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2014-12-19 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar; +Cc: kbuild-all, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, linux-kernel
tree: https://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux cpufreq/stats/cleanups
head: f6439741b76da59257758838e8b24472831e850c
commit: 2194c3c381af6cbfe8ab4fda481e07a004446e30 [12/14] cpufreq: stats: replace spinlock with mutex
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 2194c3c381af6cbfe8ab4fda481e07a004446e30
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH vireshk] cpufreq: stats: cpufreq_stats_lock can be static
2014-12-19 8:17 [vireshk:cpufreq/stats/cleanups 12/14] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
@ 2014-12-19 8:17 ` kbuild test robot
2014-12-19 8:21 ` [vireshk:cpufreq/stats/cleanups 12/14] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? Viresh Kumar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2014-12-19 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar; +Cc: kbuild-all, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, linux-kernel
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
cpufreq_stats.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
index d333659..de55ca8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/cputime.h>
-DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_stats_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_stats_lock);
struct cpufreq_stats {
unsigned int total_trans;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [vireshk:cpufreq/stats/cleanups 12/14] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
2014-12-19 8:17 [vireshk:cpufreq/stats/cleanups 12/14] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2014-12-19 8:17 ` [PATCH vireshk] cpufreq: stats: cpufreq_stats_lock can be static kbuild test robot
@ 2014-12-19 8:21 ` Viresh Kumar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-12-19 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild test robot
Cc: kbuild-all, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 19 December 2014 at 13:47, kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> tree: https://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux cpufreq/stats/cleanups
> head: f6439741b76da59257758838e8b24472831e850c
> commit: 2194c3c381af6cbfe8ab4fda481e07a004446e30 [12/14] cpufreq: stats: replace spinlock with mutex
> reproduce:
> # apt-get install sparse
> git checkout 2194c3c381af6cbfe8ab4fda481e07a004446e30
> make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
> make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
>
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
>>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
Thanks fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-19 8:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-19 8:17 [vireshk:cpufreq/stats/cleanups 12/14] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2014-12-19 8:17 ` [PATCH vireshk] cpufreq: stats: cpufreq_stats_lock can be static kbuild test robot
2014-12-19 8:21 ` [vireshk:cpufreq/stats/cleanups 12/14] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c:19:1: sparse: symbol 'cpufreq_stats_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? Viresh Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox