public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"4 . 9+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Examine the correct CPU when we update util
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:40:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171102111022.GB4240@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171102105438.14258-1-chris.redpath@arm.com>

On 02-11-17, 10:54, Chris Redpath wrote:
> Since:
> 
> 4296f23ed cpufreq: schedutil: Fix per-CPU structure initialization in
>  sugov_start()

Good catch but you pointed out to the wrong commit really.

674e75411fc2 ("sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks"

is the real culprit as that's where the 'cpu' field is added.

> We lost the value of sg_cpu->cpu which is assigned during
> sugov_register. The memset in sugov_start overwrites it with zero.
> 
> This leads to always looking at the utilization of CPU0 instead of
> the one we just updated when we do a utilization update callback.
> 
> Let's fix this by consolidating the initialization code into
> sugov_start().
> 
> Fixes: 4296f23ed49a ("cpufreq: schedutil: Fix per-CPU structure initialization in sugov_start()")

Fixes: 674e75411fc2 ("sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks")

> Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: 4.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>

This wouldn't be required now as it got merged in 4.14 only and Rafael
should be able to get that as part of 4.14 itself.

> ---
>  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 6c1a7fcfa2a7..eeb7e0a1d861 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -731,6 +731,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  		sg_cpu->sg_policy = sg_policy;
>  		sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT;
>  		sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> +		sg_cpu->cpu = cpu;

Maybe just move this below memset.

>  	}
>  
>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) {
> @@ -793,11 +794,6 @@ struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_default_governor(void)
>  
>  static int __init sugov_register(void)
>  {
> -	int cpu;
> -
> -	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> -		per_cpu(sugov_cpu, cpu).cpu = cpu;
> -
>  	return cpufreq_register_governor(&schedutil_gov);
>  }
>  fs_initcall(sugov_register);

Diff looks fine though.

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-02 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-02 10:54 [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Examine the correct CPU when we update util Chris Redpath
2017-11-02 11:10 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-11-02 11:38   ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Redpath
2017-11-02 11:40     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-02 12:06       ` Chris Redpath
2017-11-03  3:40         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-03 13:36           ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Redpath
2017-11-03 15:45             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-07  9:49               ` Chris Redpath
2017-11-07  9:59                 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-07 10:09                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-11-07 11:03                     ` Chris Redpath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171102111022.GB4240@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox