Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add Elkhart Lake to Intel family

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:40:49PM +0530, Bhardwaj, Rajneesh wrote:
> > On 08-Aug-19 7:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:19:23AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
> 
> > > > Usually, we should use the code name of microarchitecture for the name of
> > > > CPUID.
> 
> > > Oh yes, very much. A quick google seems to suggest these are in fact
> > > Tremont cores. So then the naming should be:
> > > 
> > >    INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_TREMONT_xxx
> > 
> > Sure, I feel INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_TREMONT_ELKHART_LAKE may be too long so is
> > INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_TREMONT_PLUS a better name?
> 
> Neither. WikiChip says it is the successor to Denverton, which is a
> server chip. If this is true then:
> 
> #define INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_TREMONT_X	0x.. /* Elkhart Lake */
> 
> is what it should be.

Of course we already have a TREMONT_X :-/ WikiChip is also confusing me
further by stating that Jacobsville is the platform that carries the
Elkhart Lake core, so they should be the bloody same chip.

But here we are, with two different model numbers.

Can someone please spell out in dummy language wth these chips are?

Are they both server chips?