Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Reka Norman <rekanorman@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Decay metrics below DECAY_SHIFT threshold
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:03:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2819353.mvXUDI8C0e@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3396811.44csPzL39Z@rafael.j.wysocki>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If a given governor metric falls below a certain value (8 for
DECAY_SHIFT equal to 3), it will not decay any more due to the
simplistic decay implementation.  This may in some cases lead to
subtle inconsistencies in the governor behavior, so change the
decay implementation to take it into account and set the metric
at hand to 0 in that case.

Suggested-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

v1 -> v2:
   * Ensure that cpu_data->total is always the sum of the intercepts and hits
     metrics for all of the idle states (Christian).

---
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
@@ -148,6 +148,16 @@ struct teo_cpu {
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct teo_cpu, teo_cpus);
 
+static void teo_decay(unsigned int *metric)
+{
+	unsigned int delta = *metric >> DECAY_SHIFT;
+
+	if (delta)
+		*metric -= delta;
+	else
+		*metric = 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * teo_update - Update CPU metrics after wakeup.
  * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data.
@@ -158,8 +168,9 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
 	struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus, dev->cpu);
 	int i, idx_timer = 0, idx_duration = 0;
 	s64 target_residency_ns, measured_ns;
+	unsigned int total = 0;
 
-	cpu_data->short_idles -= cpu_data->short_idles >> DECAY_SHIFT;
+	teo_decay(&cpu_data->short_idles);
 
 	if (cpu_data->artificial_wakeup) {
 		/*
@@ -195,8 +206,10 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
 	for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
 		struct teo_bin *bin = &cpu_data->state_bins[i];
 
-		bin->hits -= bin->hits >> DECAY_SHIFT;
-		bin->intercepts -= bin->intercepts >> DECAY_SHIFT;
+		teo_decay(&bin->hits);
+		total += bin->hits;
+		teo_decay(&bin->intercepts);
+		total += bin->intercepts;
 
 		target_residency_ns = drv->states[i].target_residency_ns;
 
@@ -207,7 +220,9 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
 		}
 	}
 
-	cpu_data->tick_intercepts -= cpu_data->tick_intercepts >> DECAY_SHIFT;
+	cpu_data->total = total + PULSE;
+
+	teo_decay(&cpu_data->tick_intercepts);
 	/*
 	 * If the measured idle duration falls into the same bin as the sleep
 	 * length, this is a "hit", so update the "hits" metric for that bin.
@@ -221,9 +236,6 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
 		if (TICK_NSEC <= measured_ns)
 			cpu_data->tick_intercepts += PULSE;
 	}
-
-	cpu_data->total -= cpu_data->total >> DECAY_SHIFT;
-	cpu_data->total += PULSE;
 }
 
 static bool teo_state_ok(int i, struct cpuidle_driver *drv)




  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-12 16:21 [PATCH v1 0/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Assorted improvements Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-12 16:22 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Drop incorrect target residency check Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:32   ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-13 11:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:47       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 13:26         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 13:24   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Drop misguided " Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-14  9:16     ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-12 16:23 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Drop redundant function parameter Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:46   ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-12 16:24 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Use s64 consistently in teo_update() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:48   ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-12 16:25 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Decay metrics below DECAY_SHIFT threshold Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-12 17:29   ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-12 17:51     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-12 18:00       ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-12 18:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-11-13 11:49     ` [PATCH v2 " Christian Loehle
2025-11-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Assorted improvements Christian Loehle
2025-11-13 15:25   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-19 22:52   ` Doug Smythies
2025-11-20 11:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-20 13:35       ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-20 13:38         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-20 13:57           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-20 15:21             ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2819353.mvXUDI8C0e@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rekanorman@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox