Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Reka Norman <rekanorman@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Decay metrics below DECAY_SHIFT threshold
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:29:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5de1eca-494e-4624-a86b-bf917e562a08@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3396811.44csPzL39Z@rafael.j.wysocki>

On 11/12/25 16:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> If a given governor metric falls below a certain value (8 for
> DECAY_SHIFT equal to 3), it will not decay any more due to the
> simplistic decay implementation.  This may in some cases lead to
> subtle inconsistencies in the governor behavior, so change the
> decay implementation to take it into account and set the metric
> at hand to 0 in that case.
> 
> Suggested-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c |   20 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,16 @@ struct teo_cpu {
>  
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct teo_cpu, teo_cpus);
>  
> +static void teo_decay(unsigned int *metric)
> +{
> +	unsigned int delta = *metric >> DECAY_SHIFT;
> +
> +	if (delta)
> +		*metric -= delta;
> +	else
> +		*metric = 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * teo_update - Update CPU metrics after wakeup.
>   * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data.
> @@ -159,7 +169,7 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
>  	int i, idx_timer = 0, idx_duration = 0;
>  	s64 target_residency_ns, measured_ns;
>  
> -	cpu_data->short_idles -= cpu_data->short_idles >> DECAY_SHIFT;
> +	teo_decay(&cpu_data->short_idles);
>  
>  	if (cpu_data->artificial_wakeup) {
>  		/*
> @@ -195,8 +205,8 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
>  	for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
>  		struct teo_bin *bin = &cpu_data->state_bins[i];
>  
> -		bin->hits -= bin->hits >> DECAY_SHIFT;
> -		bin->intercepts -= bin->intercepts >> DECAY_SHIFT;
> +		teo_decay(&bin->hits);
> +		teo_decay(&bin->intercepts);
>  
>  		target_residency_ns = drv->states[i].target_residency_ns;
>  
> @@ -207,7 +217,7 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	cpu_data->tick_intercepts -= cpu_data->tick_intercepts >> DECAY_SHIFT;
> +	teo_decay(&cpu_data->tick_intercepts);
>  	/*
>  	 * If the measured idle duration falls into the same bin as the sleep
>  	 * length, this is a "hit", so update the "hits" metric for that bin.
> @@ -222,7 +232,7 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_dr
>  			cpu_data->tick_intercepts += PULSE;
>  	}
>  
> -	cpu_data->total -= cpu_data->total >> DECAY_SHIFT;
> +	teo_decay(&cpu_data->total);
>  	cpu_data->total += PULSE;

This will result in total no longer being a strict sum of the bins.
Any reason not to do something like:

-----8<-----

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
index e5b795cf3155..ff58d70ee80d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
@@ -148,14 +148,19 @@ struct teo_cpu {
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct teo_cpu, teo_cpus);
 
-static void teo_decay(unsigned int *metric)
+static unsigned int teo_decay(unsigned int *metric)
 {
        unsigned int delta = *metric >> DECAY_SHIFT;
+       unsigned int decay;
 
-       if (delta)
+       if (delta) {
                *metric -= delta;
-       else
-               *metric = 0;
+               return delta;
+       }
+
+       decay = *metric;
+       *metric = 0;
+       return decay;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -168,6 +173,7 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
        struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus, dev->cpu);
        int i, idx_timer = 0, idx_duration = 0;
        s64 target_residency_ns, measured_ns;
+       unsigned int total_decay = 0;
 
        teo_decay(&cpu_data->short_idles);
 
@@ -205,8 +211,8 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
        for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
                struct teo_bin *bin = &cpu_data->state_bins[i];
 
-               teo_decay(&bin->hits);
-               teo_decay(&bin->intercepts);
+               total_decay += teo_decay(&bin->hits);
+               total_decay += teo_decay(&bin->intercepts);
 
                target_residency_ns = drv->states[i].target_residency_ns;
 
@@ -232,7 +238,7 @@ static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
                        cpu_data->tick_intercepts += PULSE;
        }
 
-       teo_decay(&cpu_data->total);
+       cpu_data->total -= total_decay;
        cpu_data->total += PULSE;
 }
 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-12 16:21 [PATCH v1 0/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Assorted improvements Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-12 16:22 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Drop incorrect target residency check Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:32   ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-13 11:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:47       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 13:26         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 13:24   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Drop misguided " Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-14  9:16     ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-12 16:23 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Drop redundant function parameter Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:46   ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-12 16:24 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Use s64 consistently in teo_update() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:48   ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-12 16:25 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Decay metrics below DECAY_SHIFT threshold Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-12 17:29   ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2025-11-12 17:51     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-12 18:00       ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-12 18:03   ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:49     ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] cpuidle: governors: teo: Assorted improvements Christian Loehle
2025-11-13 15:25   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-19 22:52   ` Doug Smythies
2025-11-20 11:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-20 13:35       ` Christian Loehle
2025-11-20 13:38         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-20 13:57           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-20 15:21             ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a5de1eca-494e-4624-a86b-bf917e562a08@arm.com \
    --to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rekanorman@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox