[PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: bandgap: Fix build warning if !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

[PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: bandgap: Fix build warning if !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

[grygorii.strashko]

From: Grygorii Strashko <Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org>

Fix following build warning if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set:

drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1478:12: warning: 'ti_bandgap_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 static int ti_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev)
            ^
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1492:12: warning: 'ti_bandgap_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 static int ti_bandgap_resume(struct device *dev)
            ^
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
index 74c0e34..5d46660 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
@@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int ti_bandgap_save_ctxt(struct ti_bandgap *bgp)
 {
 	int i;
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: bandgap: Fix build warning if !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

[Nishanth Menon]

On 16:55-20150206, grygorii.strashko@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Grygorii Strashko <Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org>
> 
> Fix following build warning if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set:
> 
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1478:12: warning: 'ti_bandgap_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int ti_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev)
>             ^
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1492:12: warning: 'ti_bandgap_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int ti_bandgap_resume(struct device *dev)
>             ^
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> index 74c0e34..5d46660 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static int ti_bandgap_save_ctxt(struct ti_bandgap *bgp)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Suggest aligning with Paul as well:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5795391/

Otherwise:
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: bandgap: Fix build warning if !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

[Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org]

Hi Rui,

On 02/09/2015 05:01 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 16:55-20150206, grygorii.strashko@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Grygorii Strashko <Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org>
>>
>> Fix following build warning if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set:
>>
>> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1478:12: warning: 'ti_bandgap_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>   static int ti_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>              ^
>> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1492:12: warning: 'ti_bandgap_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>   static int ti_bandgap_resume(struct device *dev)
>>              ^
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
>> index 74c0e34..5d46660 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
>> @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>   static int ti_bandgap_save_ctxt(struct ti_bandgap *bgp)
>>   {
>>   	int i;
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
>>
> 
> Suggest aligning with Paul as well:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5795391/

^Paul Walmsley wrote: Oh, nothing to be confused by, I just missed the
 earlier patch. I withdraw mine.

> 
> Otherwise:
> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> 

It looks like this patch is missed in 4.0-rc1, so could it be merged
during rc cycle or you'd like me to resend it?
(I've rechecked - it can be applied on top of Linux 4.0-rc1 without any issues)


-- 
regards,
-grygorii

Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: bandgap: Fix build warning if !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

[Eduardo Valentin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2120 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:01:23PM +0200, Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org wrote:
> Hi Rui,
> 
> On 02/09/2015 05:01 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 16:55-20150206, grygorii.strashko@linaro.org wrote:
> >> From: Grygorii Strashko <Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> Fix following build warning if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set:
> >>
> >> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1478:12: warning: 'ti_bandgap_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >>   static int ti_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >>              ^
> >> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1492:12: warning: 'ti_bandgap_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >>   static int ti_bandgap_resume(struct device *dev)
> >>              ^
> >> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 2 +-
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> >> index 74c0e34..5d46660 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> >> @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>   	return 0;
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> >>   static int ti_bandgap_save_ctxt(struct ti_bandgap *bgp)
> >>   {
> >>   	int i;
> >> -- 
> >> 1.9.1
> >>
> > 
> > Suggest aligning with Paul as well:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5795391/
> 
> ^Paul Walmsley wrote: Oh, nothing to be confused by, I just missed the
>  earlier patch. I withdraw mine.
> 
> > 
> > Otherwise:
> > Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> > 
> 
> It looks like this patch is missed in 4.0-rc1, so could it be merged
> during rc cycle or you'd like me to resend it?
> (I've rechecked - it can be applied on top of Linux 4.0-rc1 without any issues)


No need to resend. I will add to my -fixes queue.

BR,

Eduardo Valentin

> 
> 
> -- 
> regards,
> -grygorii

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: bandgap: Fix build warning if !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

[Grygorii Strashko]

On 24 February 2015 at 20:03, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:01:23PM +0200, Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org wrote:
>> On 02/09/2015 05:01 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> > On 16:55-20150206, grygorii.strashko@linaro.org wrote:
>> >> From: Grygorii Strashko <Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org>
>> >>
>> >> Fix following build warning if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set:
>> >>
>> >> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1478:12: warning: 'ti_bandgap_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> >>   static int ti_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> >>              ^
>> >
>> > Suggest aligning with Paul as well:
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5795391/
>>
>> ^Paul Walmsley wrote: Oh, nothing to be confused by, I just missed the
>>  earlier patch. I withdraw mine.
>>
>> >
>> > Otherwise:
>> > Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> >
>>
>> It looks like this patch is missed in 4.0-rc1, so could it be merged
>> during rc cycle or you'd like me to resend it?
>> (I've rechecked - it can be applied on top of Linux 4.0-rc1 without any issues)
>
>
> No need to resend. I will add to my -fixes queue.
>

Thanks.


-- 
Best regards,
-grygorii