From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/16] sched/schedutil: Add a new tunable to dictate response time
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:22:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c55339cd-85d6-4777-beec-41c4d9931b9a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240820163512.1096301-7-qyousef@layalina.io>
On 20/08/2024 18:35, Qais Yousef wrote:
> The new tunable, response_time_ms, allow us to speed up or slow down
> the response time of the policy to meet the perf, power and thermal
> characteristic desired by the user/sysadmin. There's no single universal
> trade-off that we can apply for all systems even if they use the same
> SoC. The form factor of the system, the dominant use case, and in case
> of battery powered systems, the size of the battery and presence or
> absence of active cooling can play a big role on what would be best to
> use.
>
> The new tunable provides sensible defaults, but yet gives the power to
> control the response time to the user/sysadmin, if they wish to.
>
> This tunable is applied before we apply the DVFS headroom.
>
> The default behavior of applying 1.25 headroom can be re-instated easily
> now. But we continue to keep the min required headroom to overcome
> hardware limitation in its speed to change DVFS. And any additional
> headroom to speed things up must be applied by userspace to match their
> expectation for best perf/watt as it dictates a type of policy that will
> be better for some systems, but worse for others.
>
> There's a whitespace clean up included in sugov_start().
>
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.rst | 17 +++-
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 +
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.rst
> index 6adb7988e0eb..fa0d602a920e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.rst
> @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ is passed by the scheduler to the governor callback which causes the frequency
> to go up to the allowed maximum immediately and then draw back to the value
> returned by the above formula over time.
>
> -This governor exposes only one tunable:
> +This governor exposes two tunables:
>
> ``rate_limit_us``
> Minimum time (in microseconds) that has to pass between two consecutive
> @@ -427,6 +427,21 @@ This governor exposes only one tunable:
> The purpose of this tunable is to reduce the scheduler context overhead
> of the governor which might be excessive without it.
>
> +``respone_time_ms``
> + Amount of time (in milliseconds) required to ramp the policy from
> + lowest to highest frequency. Can be decreased to speed up the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This has changed IMHO. Should be the time from lowest (or better 0) to
second highest frequency.
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230827233203.1315953-6-qyousef@layalina.io
[...]
> @@ -59,6 +63,70 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sugov_cpu, sugov_cpu);
>
> /************************ Governor internals ***********************/
>
> +static inline u64 sugov_calc_freq_response_ms(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
> +{
> + int cpu = cpumask_first(sg_policy->policy->cpus);
> + unsigned long cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
> + unsigned int max_freq, sec_max_freq;
> +
> + max_freq = sg_policy->policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> + sec_max_freq = __resolve_freq(sg_policy->policy,
> + max_freq - 1,
> + CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
> +
> + /*
> + * We will request max_freq as soon as util crosses the capacity at
> + * second highest frequency. So effectively our response time is the
> + * util at which we cross the cap@2nd_highest_freq.
> + */
> + cap = sec_max_freq * cap / max_freq;
> +
> + return approximate_runtime(cap + 1);
> +}
Still uses the CPU capacity value based on dt-entry
capacity-dmips-mhz = <578> (CPU0 on juno-r0)
^^^
i.e. frequency invariance is not considered.
[ 1.943356] CPU0 max_freq=850000 sec_max_freq=775000 cap=578 cap_at_sec_max_opp=527 runtime=34
^^^^^^^
[ 1.957593] CPU1 max_freq=1100000 sec_max_freq=950000 cap=1024 cap_at_sec_max_opp=884 runtime=92
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpu_capacity
446
^^^
1024
1024
446
446
446
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-16 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-20 16:34 [RFC PATCH 00/16] sched/fair/schedutil: Better manage system response time Qais Yousef
2024-08-20 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] sched: cpufreq: Rename map_util_perf to sugov_apply_dvfs_headroom Qais Yousef
2024-08-20 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] sched/pelt: Add a new function to approximate the future util_avg value Qais Yousef
2024-08-20 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] sched/pelt: Add a new function to approximate runtime to reach given util Qais Yousef
2024-08-22 5:36 ` Sultan Alsawaf (unemployed)
2024-09-16 15:31 ` Christian Loehle
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] sched/fair: Remove magic hardcoded margin in fits_capacity() Qais Yousef
2024-08-22 5:09 ` Sultan Alsawaf (unemployed)
2024-09-17 19:41 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] sched: cpufreq: Remove magic 1.25 headroom from sugov_apply_dvfs_headroom() Qais Yousef
2024-11-13 4:51 ` John Stultz
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] sched/schedutil: Add a new tunable to dictate response time Qais Yousef
2024-09-16 22:22 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2024-09-17 10:22 ` Christian Loehle
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] sched/pelt: Introduce PELT multiplier boot time parameter Qais Yousef
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] sched/fair: Extend util_est to improve rampup time Qais Yousef
2024-09-17 19:21 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-10-14 16:04 ` Christian Loehle
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] sched/fair: util_est: Take into account periodic tasks Qais Yousef
2024-11-13 4:57 ` John Stultz
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] sched/qos: Add a new sched-qos interface Qais Yousef
2024-11-28 1:47 ` John Stultz
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] sched/qos: Add rampup multiplier QoS Qais Yousef
2024-09-17 20:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-09-17 21:43 ` Ricardo Neri
2024-09-18 21:21 ` Ricardo Neri
2024-10-14 16:06 ` Christian Loehle
2024-11-28 0:12 ` John Stultz
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] sched/pelt: Add new waiting_avg to record when runnable && !running Qais Yousef
2024-09-18 7:01 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] sched/schedutil: Take into account waiting_avg in apply_dvfs_headroom Qais Yousef
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] sched/schedutil: Ignore dvfs headroom when util is decaying Qais Yousef
2024-08-22 5:29 ` Sultan Alsawaf (unemployed)
2024-09-18 10:40 ` Christian Loehle
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] sched/fair: Enable disabling util_est via rampup_multiplier Qais Yousef
2024-08-20 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] sched/fair: Don't mess with util_avg post init Qais Yousef
2024-09-16 12:21 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] sched/fair/schedutil: Better manage system response time Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c55339cd-85d6-4777-beec-41c4d9931b9a@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox