public inbox for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: [md PATCH 01/14] md/raid5: use md_write_start to count stripes, not bios
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:39:01 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <148721994120.7521.3518782809103694227.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148721992248.7521.17160361058957519076.stgit@noble>

We use md_write_start() to increase the count of pending writes, and
md_write_end() to decrement the count.  We currently count bios
submitted to md/raid5.  Change it count stripe_heads that a WRITE bio
has been attached to.

So now, raid5_make_request() calls md_write_start() and then
md_write_end() to keep the count elevated during the setup of the
request.

add_stripe_bio() calls md_write_start() for each stripe_head, and the
completion routines always call md_write_end(), instead of only
calling it when raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes() returns 0.
make_discard_request also calls md_write_start/end().

The parallel between md_write_{start,end} and use of bi_phys_segments
can be seen in that:
 Whenever we set bi_phys_segments to 1, we now call md_write_start.
 Whenever we increment it on non-read requests with
   raid5_inc_bi_active_stripes(), we now call md_write_start().
 Whenever we decrement bi_phys_segments on non-read requsts with
    raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(), we now call md_write_end().

This reduces our dependence on keeping a per-bio count of active
stripes in bi_phys_segments.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid5-cache.c |    2 +-
 drivers/md/raid5.c       |   27 +++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index 302dea3296ba..4b211f914d17 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
@@ -265,8 +265,8 @@ r5c_return_dev_pending_writes(struct r5conf *conf, struct r5dev *dev,
 	while (wbi && wbi->bi_iter.bi_sector <
 	       dev->sector + STRIPE_SECTORS) {
 		wbi2 = r5_next_bio(wbi, dev->sector);
+		md_write_end(conf->mddev);
 		if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(wbi)) {
-			md_write_end(conf->mddev);
 			bio_list_add(return_bi, wbi);
 		}
 		wbi = wbi2;
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 3c7e106c12a2..760b726943c9 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3075,6 +3075,7 @@ static int add_stripe_bio(struct stripe_head *sh, struct bio *bi, int dd_idx,
 		bi->bi_next = *bip;
 	*bip = bi;
 	raid5_inc_bi_active_stripes(bi);
+	md_write_start(conf->mddev, bi);
 
 	if (forwrite) {
 		/* check if page is covered */
@@ -3198,10 +3199,9 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
 			struct bio *nextbi = r5_next_bio(bi, sh->dev[i].sector);
 
 			bi->bi_error = -EIO;
-			if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi)) {
-				md_write_end(conf->mddev);
+			md_write_end(conf->mddev);
+			if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi))
 				bio_list_add(return_bi, bi);
-			}
 			bi = nextbi;
 		}
 		if (bitmap_end)
@@ -3222,10 +3222,9 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
 			struct bio *bi2 = r5_next_bio(bi, sh->dev[i].sector);
 
 			bi->bi_error = -EIO;
-			if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi)) {
-				md_write_end(conf->mddev);
+			md_write_end(conf->mddev);
+			if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi))
 				bio_list_add(return_bi, bi);
-			}
 			bi = bi2;
 		}
 
@@ -3582,10 +3581,9 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf,
 				while (wbi && wbi->bi_iter.bi_sector <
 					dev->sector + STRIPE_SECTORS) {
 					wbi2 = r5_next_bio(wbi, dev->sector);
-					if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(wbi)) {
-						md_write_end(conf->mddev);
+					md_write_end(conf->mddev);
+					if (!raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(wbi))
 						bio_list_add(return_bi, wbi);
-					}
 					wbi = wbi2;
 				}
 				bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
@@ -5268,6 +5266,7 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bi)
 
 	bi->bi_next = NULL;
 	bi->bi_phys_segments = 1; /* over-loaded to count active stripes */
+	md_write_start(mddev, bi);
 
 	stripe_sectors = conf->chunk_sectors *
 		(conf->raid_disks - conf->max_degraded);
@@ -5314,6 +5313,7 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bi)
 			sh->dev[d].towrite = bi;
 			set_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &sh->dev[d].flags);
 			raid5_inc_bi_active_stripes(bi);
+			md_write_start(mddev, bi);
 			sh->overwrite_disks++;
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
@@ -5336,9 +5336,9 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bi)
 		release_stripe_plug(mddev, sh);
 	}
 
+	md_write_end(mddev);
 	remaining = raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi);
 	if (remaining == 0) {
-		md_write_end(mddev);
 		bio_endio(bi);
 	}
 }
@@ -5373,8 +5373,6 @@ static void raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
 		do_flush = bi->bi_opf & REQ_PREFLUSH;
 	}
 
-	md_write_start(mddev, bi);
-
 	/*
 	 * If array is degraded, better not do chunk aligned read because
 	 * later we might have to read it again in order to reconstruct
@@ -5397,6 +5395,7 @@ static void raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
 	last_sector = bio_end_sector(bi);
 	bi->bi_next = NULL;
 	bi->bi_phys_segments = 1;	/* over-loaded to count active stripes */
+	md_write_start(mddev, bi);
 
 	prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 	for (;logical_sector < last_sector; logical_sector += STRIPE_SECTORS) {
@@ -5531,11 +5530,11 @@ static void raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
 	}
 	finish_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w);
 
+	if (rw == WRITE)
+		md_write_end(mddev);
 	remaining = raid5_dec_bi_active_stripes(bi);
 	if (remaining == 0) {
 
-		if ( rw == WRITE )
-			md_write_end(mddev);
 
 		trace_block_bio_complete(bdev_get_queue(bi->bi_bdev),
 					 bi, 0);



  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-16  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-16  4:39 [md PATCH 00/14] remove all abuse of bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-02-16 17:29   ` [md PATCH 01/14] md/raid5: use md_write_start to count stripes, not bios Shaohua Li
2017-02-17  2:04     ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 02/14] md/raid5: simplfy delaying of writes while metadata is updated NeilBrown
2017-02-16 17:37   ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-17  2:10     ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 04/14] block: trace completion of all bios NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 03/14] md/raid5: call bio_endio() directly rather than queueing for later NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 06/14] md/raid5: remove over-loading of ->bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 05/14] md/raid5: use bio_inc_remaining() instead of repurposing bi_phys_segments as a counter NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 11/14] md/raid5: don't test ->writes_pending in raid5_remove_disk NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 09/14] md/raid10: stop using bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-02-16 14:26   ` Jack Wang
2017-02-17  2:15     ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 10/14] md/raid1: stop using bi_phys_segment NeilBrown
2017-02-20 10:57   ` Ming Lei
2017-02-21  0:05     ` NeilBrown
2017-02-21  7:41       ` Ming Lei
2017-03-03  0:34         ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 07/14] Revert "md/raid5: limit request size according to implementation limits" NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 08/14] md/raid1, raid10: move rXbio accounting closer to allocation NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 13/14] md: close a race with setting mddev->in_sync NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 14/14] MD: use per-cpu counter for writes_pending NeilBrown
2017-02-16 20:12   ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-17  2:34     ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16  4:39 ` [md PATCH 12/14] md: factor out set_in_sync() NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=148721994120.7521.3518782809103694227.stgit@noble \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox