From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: [md PATCH 12/14] md: factor out set_in_sync()
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:39:03 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <148721994297.7521.6251174495409181904.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148721992248.7521.17160361058957519076.stgit@noble>
Three separate places in md.c check if the number of active
writes is zero and, if so, sets mddev->in_sync.
There are a few differences, but there shouldn't be:
- it is always appropriate to notify the change in
sysfs_state, and there is no need to do this outside a
spin-locked region.
- we never need to check ->recovery_cp. The state of resync
is not relevant for whether there are any pending writes
or not (which is what ->in_sync reports).
So create set_in_sync() which does the correct tests and
makes the correct changes, and call this in all three
places.
Any behaviour changes here a minor and cosmetic.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
drivers/md/md.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 01175dac0db6..1d5fdc4a659d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -2250,6 +2250,24 @@ static void export_array(struct mddev *mddev)
mddev->major_version = 0;
}
+static bool set_in_sync(struct mddev *mddev)
+{
+ bool ret = false;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!spin_is_locked(&mddev->lock));
+ if (atomic_read(&mddev->writes_pending) == 0) {
+ if (mddev->in_sync == 0) {
+ mddev->in_sync = 1;
+ set_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_CLEAN, &mddev->sb_flags);
+ sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_state);
+ }
+ ret = true;
+ }
+ if (mddev->safemode == 1)
+ mddev->safemode = 0;
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void sync_sbs(struct mddev *mddev, int nospares)
{
/* Update each superblock (in-memory image), but
@@ -3948,7 +3966,7 @@ static int restart_array(struct mddev *mddev);
static ssize_t
array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
{
- int err;
+ int err = 0;
enum array_state st = match_word(buf, array_states);
if (mddev->pers && (st == active || st == clean) && mddev->ro != 1) {
@@ -3961,18 +3979,9 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
clear_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->sb_flags);
md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
wake_up(&mddev->sb_wait);
- err = 0;
} else /* st == clean */ {
restart_array(mddev);
- if (atomic_read(&mddev->writes_pending) == 0) {
- if (mddev->in_sync == 0) {
- mddev->in_sync = 1;
- if (mddev->safemode == 1)
- mddev->safemode = 0;
- set_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_CLEAN, &mddev->sb_flags);
- }
- err = 0;
- } else
+ if (!set_in_sync(mddev))
err = -EBUSY;
}
if (!err)
@@ -4030,15 +4039,7 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
if (err)
break;
spin_lock(&mddev->lock);
- if (atomic_read(&mddev->writes_pending) == 0) {
- if (mddev->in_sync == 0) {
- mddev->in_sync = 1;
- if (mddev->safemode == 1)
- mddev->safemode = 0;
- set_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_CLEAN, &mddev->sb_flags);
- }
- err = 0;
- } else
+ if (!set_in_sync(mddev))
err = -EBUSY;
spin_unlock(&mddev->lock);
} else
@@ -8450,22 +8451,10 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
md_reload_sb(mddev, mddev->good_device_nr);
}
- if (!mddev->external) {
- int did_change = 0;
+ if (!mddev->external && !mddev->in_sync) {
spin_lock(&mddev->lock);
- if (mddev->safemode &&
- !atomic_read(&mddev->writes_pending) &&
- !mddev->in_sync &&
- mddev->recovery_cp == MaxSector) {
- mddev->in_sync = 1;
- did_change = 1;
- set_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_CLEAN, &mddev->sb_flags);
- }
- if (mddev->safemode == 1)
- mddev->safemode = 0;
+ set_in_sync(mddev);
spin_unlock(&mddev->lock);
- if (did_change)
- sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_state);
}
if (mddev->sb_flags)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-16 4:39 [md PATCH 00/14] remove all abuse of bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 01/14] md/raid5: use md_write_start to count stripes, not bios NeilBrown
2017-02-16 17:29 ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-17 2:04 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 02/14] md/raid5: simplfy delaying of writes while metadata is updated NeilBrown
2017-02-16 17:37 ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-17 2:10 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 04/14] block: trace completion of all bios NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 03/14] md/raid5: call bio_endio() directly rather than queueing for later NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 05/14] md/raid5: use bio_inc_remaining() instead of repurposing bi_phys_segments as a counter NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 11/14] md/raid5: don't test ->writes_pending in raid5_remove_disk NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 06/14] md/raid5: remove over-loading of ->bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 07/14] Revert "md/raid5: limit request size according to implementation limits" NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 08/14] md/raid1, raid10: move rXbio accounting closer to allocation NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 09/14] md/raid10: stop using bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-02-16 14:26 ` Jack Wang
2017-02-17 2:15 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 10/14] md/raid1: stop using bi_phys_segment NeilBrown
2017-02-20 10:57 ` Ming Lei
2017-02-21 0:05 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-21 7:41 ` Ming Lei
2017-03-03 0:34 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 14/14] MD: use per-cpu counter for writes_pending NeilBrown
2017-02-16 20:12 ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-17 2:34 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` [md PATCH 13/14] md: close a race with setting mddev->in_sync NeilBrown
2017-02-16 4:39 ` NeilBrown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=148721994297.7521.6251174495409181904.stgit@noble \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox