public inbox for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: [md PATCH 07/15] Revert "md/raid5: limit request size according to implementation limits"
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:05:13 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <148954711328.18641.11888859968110396364.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148954692173.18641.1294690639716682540.stgit@noble>

This reverts commit e8d7c33232e5fdfa761c3416539bc5b4acd12db5.

Now that raid5 doesn't abuse bi_phys_segments any more, we no longer
need to impose these limits.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c |    9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index c3a8838e4b17..4e906e5903e8 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -7357,15 +7357,6 @@ static int raid5_run(struct mddev *mddev)
 			stripe = (stripe | (stripe-1)) + 1;
 		mddev->queue->limits.discard_alignment = stripe;
 		mddev->queue->limits.discard_granularity = stripe;
-
-		/*
-		 * We use 16-bit counter of active stripes in bi_phys_segments
-		 * (minus one for over-loaded initialization)
-		 */
-		blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mddev->queue, 0xfffe * STRIPE_SECTORS);
-		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(mddev->queue,
-					      0xfffe * STRIPE_SECTORS);
-
 		/*
 		 * unaligned part of discard request will be ignored, so can't
 		 * guarantee discard_zeroes_data



  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-15  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-15  3:05 [md PATCH 00/15 v2] remove all abuse of bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 02/15] md/raid5: simplfy delaying of writes while metadata is updated NeilBrown
2017-03-15 23:03   ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-16  2:45     ` NeilBrown
2017-03-22  1:40   ` Fix bug in " NeilBrown
2017-03-22  2:29     ` REALLY " NeilBrown
2017-03-22  2:35       ` NeilBrown
2017-03-23  2:22         ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 03/15] md/raid5: call bio_endio() directly rather than queueing for later NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 01/15] md/raid5: use md_write_start to count stripes, not bios NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 04/15] block: trace completion of all bios NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 05/15] md/raid5: use bio_inc_remaining() instead of repurposing bi_phys_segments as a counter NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 06/15] md/raid5: remove over-loading of ->bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 09/15] md/raid10: stop using bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 08/15] md/raid1, raid10: move rXbio accounting closer to allocation NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 15/15] MD: use per-cpu counter for writes_pending NeilBrown
2017-03-16  1:05   ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-16  2:57     ` NeilBrown
2017-03-22  1:55   ` Improvement for " NeilBrown
2017-03-22  2:34     ` IMPROVEMENT for " NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 12/15] md: factor out set_in_sync() NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 14/15] percpu-refcount: support synchronous switch to atomic mode NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 11/15] md/raid5: don't test ->writes_pending in raid5_remove_disk NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 13/15] md: close a race with setting mddev->in_sync NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 10/15] md/raid1: stop using bi_phys_segment NeilBrown
2017-03-16  0:13   ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-16  2:49     ` NeilBrown
2017-03-16  3:36       ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-22  1:41   ` Fix bugs in " NeilBrown
2017-03-16  1:12 ` [md PATCH 00/15 v2] remove all abuse of bi_phys_segments Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=148954711328.18641.11888859968110396364.stgit@noble \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox