public inbox for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: [md PATCH 11/15] md/raid5: don't test ->writes_pending in raid5_remove_disk
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:05:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <148954711407.18641.13319777867112915321.stgit@noble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148954692173.18641.1294690639716682540.stgit@noble>

This test on ->writes_pending cannot be safe as the counter
can be incremented at any moment and cannot be locked against.

Change it to test conf->active_stripes, which at least
can be locked against.  More changes are still needed.

A future patch will change ->writes_pending, and testing it here will
be very inconvenient.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 4e906e5903e8..5eb3764bafd3 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -7528,9 +7528,12 @@ static int raid5_remove_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev)
 		/*
 		 * we can't wait pending write here, as this is called in
 		 * raid5d, wait will deadlock.
+		 * neilb: there is no locking about new writes here,
+		 * so this cannot be safe.
 		 */
-		if (atomic_read(&mddev->writes_pending))
+		if (atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes)) {
 			return -EBUSY;
+		}
 		log_exit(conf);
 		return 0;
 	}



  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-15  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-15  3:05 [md PATCH 00/15 v2] remove all abuse of bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 03/15] md/raid5: call bio_endio() directly rather than queueing for later NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 02/15] md/raid5: simplfy delaying of writes while metadata is updated NeilBrown
2017-03-15 23:03   ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-16  2:45     ` NeilBrown
2017-03-22  1:40   ` Fix bug in " NeilBrown
2017-03-22  2:29     ` REALLY " NeilBrown
2017-03-22  2:35       ` NeilBrown
2017-03-23  2:22         ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 01/15] md/raid5: use md_write_start to count stripes, not bios NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 04/15] block: trace completion of all bios NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 07/15] Revert "md/raid5: limit request size according to implementation limits" NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 06/15] md/raid5: remove over-loading of ->bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 05/15] md/raid5: use bio_inc_remaining() instead of repurposing bi_phys_segments as a counter NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 09/15] md/raid10: stop using bi_phys_segments NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 08/15] md/raid1, raid10: move rXbio accounting closer to allocation NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 15/15] MD: use per-cpu counter for writes_pending NeilBrown
2017-03-16  1:05   ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-16  2:57     ` NeilBrown
2017-03-22  1:55   ` Improvement for " NeilBrown
2017-03-22  2:34     ` IMPROVEMENT for " NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 12/15] md: factor out set_in_sync() NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 14/15] percpu-refcount: support synchronous switch to atomic mode NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 13/15] md: close a race with setting mddev->in_sync NeilBrown
2017-03-15  3:05 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-03-15  3:05 ` [md PATCH 10/15] md/raid1: stop using bi_phys_segment NeilBrown
2017-03-16  0:13   ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-16  2:49     ` NeilBrown
2017-03-16  3:36       ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-22  1:41   ` Fix bugs in " NeilBrown
2017-03-16  1:12 ` [md PATCH 00/15 v2] remove all abuse of bi_phys_segments Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=148954711407.18641.13319777867112915321.stgit@noble \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox