From: Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID5 format 2.4 vs 2.6?
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:15:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87isfndrr6.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040426073455.GA2101@nettis.grimsta
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Daniel Brahneborg wrote:
> I have a raid5 array on a 2.4 machine, but I'd like to
> upgrade it to the 2.6 kernel. In case I have to go back
> to the 2.4 kernel, is the raid5 layout identical,
Yes.
Daniel
--
Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it.
-- Alan J. Perlis, _Epigrams in Programming_ (September, 1982)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-26 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-26 7:34 RAID5 format 2.4 vs 2.6? Daniel Brahneborg
2004-04-26 9:15 ` Daniel Pittman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87isfndrr6.fsf@enki.rimspace.net \
--to=daniel@rimspace.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox