RAID5 format 2.4 vs 2.6?

Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* RAID5 format 2.4 vs 2.6?
@ 2004-04-26  7:34 Daniel Brahneborg
  2004-04-26  9:15 ` Daniel Pittman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Brahneborg @ 2004-04-26  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

Hi,

I have a raid5 array on a 2.4 machine, but I'd like to
upgrade it to the 2.6 kernel. In case I have to go back
to the 2.4 kernel, is the raid5 layout identical, or
will the 2.4 kernel barf after the 2.6 kernel has touched
it?

Regards,

/Basic

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: RAID5 format 2.4 vs 2.6?
  2004-04-26  7:34 RAID5 format 2.4 vs 2.6? Daniel Brahneborg
@ 2004-04-26  9:15 ` Daniel Pittman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Pittman @ 2004-04-26  9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Daniel Brahneborg wrote:
> I have a raid5 array on a 2.4 machine, but I'd like to
> upgrade it to the 2.6 kernel. In case I have to go back
> to the 2.4 kernel, is the raid5 layout identical, 

Yes.
        Daniel


-- 
Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it.
        -- Alan J. Perlis, _Epigrams in Programming_ (September, 1982)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-26  9:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-26  7:34 RAID5 format 2.4 vs 2.6? Daniel Brahneborg
2004-04-26  9:15 ` Daniel Pittman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox