Linux RDMA and InfiniBand development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH RFC] svcrdma: Ignore source port when computing DRC hash
       [not found] <20190605121518.2150.26479.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
@ 2019-06-06 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
  2019-06-06 13:24   ` Chuck Lever
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-06-06 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Levin, Chuck Lever, linux-rdma, linux-nfs; +Cc: stable

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 824 bytes --]

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.7, v5.0.21, v4.19.48, v4.14.123, v4.9.180, v4.4.180.

v5.1.7: Build OK!
v5.0.21: Build OK!
v4.19.48: Build OK!
v4.14.123: Build OK!
v4.9.180: Build failed! Errors:
    net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

v4.4.180: Build failed! Errors:
    net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:635:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]


How should we proceed with this patch?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC] svcrdma: Ignore source port when computing DRC hash
  2019-06-06 13:08 ` [PATCH RFC] svcrdma: Ignore source port when computing DRC hash Sasha Levin
@ 2019-06-06 13:24   ` Chuck Lever
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2019-06-06 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Levin; +Cc: linux-rdma, Linux NFS Mailing List, stable



> On Jun 6, 2019, at 9:08 AM, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> [This is an automated email]
> 
> This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
> The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
> 
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.7, v5.0.21, v4.19.48, v4.14.123, v4.9.180, v4.4.180.
> 
> v5.1.7: Build OK!
> v5.0.21: Build OK!
> v4.19.48: Build OK!
> v4.14.123: Build OK!
> v4.9.180: Build failed! Errors:
>    net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> v4.4.180: Build failed! Errors:
>    net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:635:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> 
> How should we proceed with this patch?

If the review completes without objection, I will resubmit
this patch with an updated Cc: . Thanks for testing!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-06 13:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20190605121518.2150.26479.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
2019-06-06 13:08 ` [PATCH RFC] svcrdma: Ignore source port when computing DRC hash Sasha Levin
2019-06-06 13:24   ` Chuck Lever

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox