* [PATCH v3 for-rc] RDMA/rxe: Fix panic when calling kmem_cache_create()
@ 2020-08-24 15:52 Kamal Heib
2020-08-24 16:41 ` Bart Van Assche
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kamal Heib @ 2020-08-24 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rdma; +Cc: Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe, Zhu Yanjun, Kamal Heib
To avoid the following kernel panic when calling kmem_cache_create()
with a NULL pointer from pool_cache(), Block the rxe_param_set_add()
from running if the rdma_rxe module is not loaded.
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000000b
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 4 PID: 8512 Comm: modprobe Kdump: loaded Not tainted 4.18.0-231.el8.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 10/02/2018
RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_alloc+0xd1/0x1b0
Code: 8b 57 18 45 8b 77 1c 48 8b 5c 24 30 0f 1f 44 00 00 5b 48 89 e8 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 81 e3 00 00 10 00 75 0e 4d 89 fe <41> f6 47 0b 04 0f 84 6c ff ff ff 4c 89 ff e8 cc da 01 00 49 89 c6
RSP: 0018:ffffa2b8c773f9d0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000005
RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00000000006080c0 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff8ea0a8634fd0 R08: ffffa2b8c773f988 R09: 00000000006000c0
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000230 R12: 00000000006080c0
R13: ffffffffc0a97fc8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007f9138ed9740(0000) GS:ffff8ea4ae800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000000000000b CR3: 000000046d59a000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
Call Trace:
rxe_alloc+0xc8/0x160 [rdma_rxe]
rxe_get_dma_mr+0x25/0xb0 [rdma_rxe]
__ib_alloc_pd+0xcb/0x160 [ib_core]
ib_mad_init_device+0x296/0x8b0 [ib_core]
add_client_context+0x11a/0x160 [ib_core]
enable_device_and_get+0xdc/0x1d0 [ib_core]
ib_register_device+0x572/0x6b0 [ib_core]
? crypto_create_tfm+0x32/0xe0
? crypto_create_tfm+0x7a/0xe0
? crypto_alloc_tfm+0x58/0xf0
rxe_register_device+0x19d/0x1c0 [rdma_rxe]
rxe_net_add+0x3d/0x70 [rdma_rxe]
? dev_get_by_name_rcu+0x73/0x90
rxe_param_set_add+0xaf/0xc0 [rdma_rxe]
parse_args+0x179/0x370
? ref_module+0x1b0/0x1b0
load_module+0x135e/0x17e0
? ref_module+0x1b0/0x1b0
? __do_sys_init_module+0x13b/0x180
__do_sys_init_module+0x13b/0x180
do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1a0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
RIP: 0033:0x7f9137ed296e
Fixes: 8700e3e7c485 ("Soft RoCE driver")
Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c | 4 ++++
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.h | 2 ++
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c
index 907203afbd99..88b5c866f5ab 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Bob Pearson, Frank Zago, John Groves, Kamal Heib");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Soft RDMA transport");
MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
+bool rxe_is_loaded;
+
/* free resources for a rxe device all objects created for this device must
* have been destroyed
*/
@@ -315,6 +317,7 @@ static int __init rxe_module_init(void)
return err;
rdma_link_register(&rxe_link_ops);
+ rxe_is_loaded = true;
pr_info("loaded\n");
return 0;
}
@@ -326,6 +329,7 @@ static void __exit rxe_module_exit(void)
rxe_net_exit();
rxe_cache_exit();
+ rxe_is_loaded = false;
pr_info("unloaded\n");
}
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.h
index fb07eed9e402..d9b71b5e2fba 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.h
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
#define RXE_ROCE_V2_SPORT (0xc000)
+extern bool rxe_is_loaded;
+
static inline u32 rxe_crc32(struct rxe_dev *rxe,
u32 crc, void *next, size_t len)
{
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
index ccda5f5a3bc0..12c7ca0764d5 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
@@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ static int rxe_param_set_add(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
struct net_device *ndev;
struct rxe_dev *exists;
+ if (!rxe_is_loaded) {
+ pr_err("Please make sure to load the rdma_rxe module first\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
len = sanitize_arg(val, intf, sizeof(intf));
if (!len) {
pr_err("add: invalid interface name\n");
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 for-rc] RDMA/rxe: Fix panic when calling kmem_cache_create()
2020-08-24 15:52 [PATCH v3 for-rc] RDMA/rxe: Fix panic when calling kmem_cache_create() Kamal Heib
@ 2020-08-24 16:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-24 16:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-25 9:27 ` Kamal Heib
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2020-08-24 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamal Heib, linux-rdma; +Cc: Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe, Zhu Yanjun
On 8/24/20 8:52 AM, Kamal Heib wrote:
> +bool rxe_is_loaded;
The name of this variable seems wrong to me. My understanding is that rxe_module_init() is
called whether or not rxe has been built as a module. Consider renaming this variable into
e.g. "rxe_initialized".
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> index ccda5f5a3bc0..12c7ca0764d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ static int rxe_param_set_add(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> struct net_device *ndev;
> struct rxe_dev *exists;
>
> + if (!rxe_is_loaded) {
> + pr_err("Please make sure to load the rdma_rxe module first\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> len = sanitize_arg(val, intf, sizeof(intf));
> if (!len) {
> pr_err("add: invalid interface name\n");
The above message is misleading. Consider changing it into e.g. the following:
Please wait until initialization of the rdma_rxe module has finished.
Additionally, how about returning -EAGAIN instead of -EINVAL?
Thanks,
Bart.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 for-rc] RDMA/rxe: Fix panic when calling kmem_cache_create()
2020-08-24 16:41 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2020-08-24 16:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-25 9:36 ` Kamal Heib
2020-08-25 9:27 ` Kamal Heib
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2020-08-24 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bart Van Assche; +Cc: Kamal Heib, linux-rdma, Doug Ledford, Zhu Yanjun
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:41:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/24/20 8:52 AM, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > +bool rxe_is_loaded;
>
> The name of this variable seems wrong to me. My understanding is that rxe_module_init() is
> called whether or not rxe has been built as a module. Consider renaming this variable into
> e.g. "rxe_initialized".
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > index ccda5f5a3bc0..12c7ca0764d5 100644
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ static int rxe_param_set_add(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > struct net_device *ndev;
> > struct rxe_dev *exists;
> > + if (!rxe_is_loaded) {
> > + pr_err("Please make sure to load the rdma_rxe module first\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > len = sanitize_arg(val, intf, sizeof(intf));
> > if (!len) {
> > pr_err("add: invalid interface name\n");
>
> The above message is misleading. Consider changing it into e.g. the following:
>
> Please wait until initialization of the rdma_rxe module has finished.
How about "Module parameters are not supported, use rdma link add"
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 for-rc] RDMA/rxe: Fix panic when calling kmem_cache_create()
2020-08-24 16:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-24 16:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2020-08-25 9:27 ` Kamal Heib
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kamal Heib @ 2020-08-25 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bart Van Assche; +Cc: linux-rdma, Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe, Zhu Yanjun
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:41:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/24/20 8:52 AM, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > +bool rxe_is_loaded;
>
> The name of this variable seems wrong to me. My understanding is that rxe_module_init() is
> called whether or not rxe has been built as a module. Consider renaming this variable into
> e.g. "rxe_initialized".
>
OK, I'll change it.
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > index ccda5f5a3bc0..12c7ca0764d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ static int rxe_param_set_add(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > struct net_device *ndev;
> > struct rxe_dev *exists;
> > + if (!rxe_is_loaded) {
> > + pr_err("Please make sure to load the rdma_rxe module first\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > len = sanitize_arg(val, intf, sizeof(intf));
> > if (!len) {
> > pr_err("add: invalid interface name\n");
>
> The above message is misleading. Consider changing it into e.g. the following:
>
> Please wait until initialization of the rdma_rxe module has finished.
>
> Additionally, how about returning -EAGAIN instead of -EINVAL?
>
Yes, this makes more sense, I'll change it.
Thanks,
Kamal
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 for-rc] RDMA/rxe: Fix panic when calling kmem_cache_create()
2020-08-24 16:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2020-08-25 9:36 ` Kamal Heib
2020-08-25 13:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kamal Heib @ 2020-08-25 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Gunthorpe; +Cc: Bart Van Assche, linux-rdma, Doug Ledford, Zhu Yanjun
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:51:11PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:41:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 8/24/20 8:52 AM, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > > +bool rxe_is_loaded;
> >
> > The name of this variable seems wrong to me. My understanding is that rxe_module_init() is
> > called whether or not rxe has been built as a module. Consider renaming this variable into
> > e.g. "rxe_initialized".
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > > index ccda5f5a3bc0..12c7ca0764d5 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > > @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ static int rxe_param_set_add(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > > struct net_device *ndev;
> > > struct rxe_dev *exists;
> > > + if (!rxe_is_loaded) {
> > > + pr_err("Please make sure to load the rdma_rxe module first\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > len = sanitize_arg(val, intf, sizeof(intf));
> > > if (!len) {
> > > pr_err("add: invalid interface name\n");
> >
> > The above message is misleading. Consider changing it into e.g. the following:
> >
> > Please wait until initialization of the rdma_rxe module has finished.
>
> How about "Module parameters are not supported, use rdma link add"
>
I don't think so, This patch is targeted to for-rc (stable) and the
support of "rdma link add" is not part of all the stable versions.
Thanks,
Kamal
> Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 for-rc] RDMA/rxe: Fix panic when calling kmem_cache_create()
2020-08-25 9:36 ` Kamal Heib
@ 2020-08-25 13:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-25 15:18 ` Kamal Heib
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2020-08-25 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamal Heib; +Cc: Bart Van Assche, linux-rdma, Doug Ledford, Zhu Yanjun
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:36:24PM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:51:11PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:41:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On 8/24/20 8:52 AM, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > > > +bool rxe_is_loaded;
> > >
> > > The name of this variable seems wrong to me. My understanding is that rxe_module_init() is
> > > called whether or not rxe has been built as a module. Consider renaming this variable into
> > > e.g. "rxe_initialized".
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > > > index ccda5f5a3bc0..12c7ca0764d5 100644
> > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > > > @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ static int rxe_param_set_add(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > > > struct net_device *ndev;
> > > > struct rxe_dev *exists;
> > > > + if (!rxe_is_loaded) {
> > > > + pr_err("Please make sure to load the rdma_rxe module first\n");
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > len = sanitize_arg(val, intf, sizeof(intf));
> > > > if (!len) {
> > > > pr_err("add: invalid interface name\n");
> > >
> > > The above message is misleading. Consider changing it into e.g. the following:
> > >
> > > Please wait until initialization of the rdma_rxe module has finished.
> >
> > How about "Module parameters are not supported, use rdma link add"
>
> I don't think so, This patch is targeted to for-rc (stable) and the
> support of "rdma link add" is not part of all the stable versions.
then add "or rxe_cfg"
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 for-rc] RDMA/rxe: Fix panic when calling kmem_cache_create()
2020-08-25 13:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2020-08-25 15:18 ` Kamal Heib
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kamal Heib @ 2020-08-25 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Gunthorpe; +Cc: Bart Van Assche, linux-rdma, Doug Ledford, Zhu Yanjun
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:25:57AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:36:24PM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:51:11PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:41:14AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > On 8/24/20 8:52 AM, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > > > > +bool rxe_is_loaded;
> > > >
> > > > The name of this variable seems wrong to me. My understanding is that rxe_module_init() is
> > > > called whether or not rxe has been built as a module. Consider renaming this variable into
> > > > e.g. "rxe_initialized".
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > > > > index ccda5f5a3bc0..12c7ca0764d5 100644
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_sysfs.c
> > > > > @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ static int rxe_param_set_add(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > > > > struct net_device *ndev;
> > > > > struct rxe_dev *exists;
> > > > > + if (!rxe_is_loaded) {
> > > > > + pr_err("Please make sure to load the rdma_rxe module first\n");
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > len = sanitize_arg(val, intf, sizeof(intf));
> > > > > if (!len) {
> > > > > pr_err("add: invalid interface name\n");
> > > >
> > > > The above message is misleading. Consider changing it into e.g. the following:
> > > >
> > > > Please wait until initialization of the rdma_rxe module has finished.
> > >
> > > How about "Module parameters are not supported, use rdma link add"
> >
> > I don't think so, This patch is targeted to for-rc (stable) and the
> > support of "rdma link add" is not part of all the stable versions.
>
> then add "or rxe_cfg"
>
Done.
Thanks,
Kamal
> Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-25 15:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-24 15:52 [PATCH v3 for-rc] RDMA/rxe: Fix panic when calling kmem_cache_create() Kamal Heib
2020-08-24 16:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-24 16:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-25 9:36 ` Kamal Heib
2020-08-25 13:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-25 15:18 ` Kamal Heib
2020-08-25 9:27 ` Kamal Heib
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox