From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"BMT@zurich.ibm.com" <BMT@zurich.ibm.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] net/tun: Ensure tun devices have a MAC address
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 17:09:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23990054-8830-4F98-88DB-86DEDDDB03D9@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230505095932.4025d469@hermes.local>
> On May 5, 2023, at 12:59 PM, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 05 May 2023 11:42:17 -0400
> Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>>
>> A non-zero MAC address enables a network device to be assigned as
>> the underlying device for a virtual RDMA device. Without a non-
>> zero MAC address, cma_acquire_dev_by_src_ip() is unable to find the
>> underlying egress device that corresponds to a source IP address,
>> and rdma_resolve_address() fails.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/tun.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> index d4d0a41a905a..da85abfcd254 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> @@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ static void tun_net_initialize(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> /* Point-to-Point TUN Device */
>> dev->hard_header_len = 0;
>> - dev->addr_len = 0;
>> + dev->addr_len = ETH_ALEN;
>> dev->mtu = 1500;
>>
>> /* Zero header length */
>
> This is a bad idea.
> TUN devices are L3 devices without any MAC address.
> This patch will change the semantics and break users.
I suspected this might be a problem, thanks for the quick
feedback.
> If you want an L2 address, you need to use TAP, not TUN device.
We can't assume how the VPN is implemented. In our case,
it's Tailscale, which creates a tun device. wireguard (in
kernel) is the same.
We would prefer a mechanism that can support tun. Having a
MAC is the easiest way forward, but is not a hard
requirement AFAICT.
--
Chuck Lever
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-05 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-05 15:41 [PATCH RFC 0/3] siw on tunnel devices Chuck Lever
2023-05-05 15:42 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] net/tun: Ensure tun devices have a MAC address Chuck Lever
2023-05-05 16:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-05 17:09 ` Chuck Lever III [this message]
2023-05-05 15:42 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] net/lo: Ensure lo " Chuck Lever
2023-05-05 16:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] RDMA/siw: Require non-zero 6-byte MACs for soft iWARP Chuck Lever
2023-05-05 19:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-05 20:03 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-06 18:05 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-23 19:18 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-23 19:44 ` Tom Talpey
2023-05-23 22:50 ` Chuck Lever III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23990054-8830-4F98-88DB-86DEDDDB03D9@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=BMT@zurich.ibm.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox