From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Bernard Metzler <BMT@zurich.ibm.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] RDMA/siw: Require non-zero 6-byte MACs for soft iWARP
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 19:18:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7825F977-3F62-4AFC-92F2-233C5EAE01D3@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZFVf+wzF6Px8nlVR@ziepe.ca>
> On May 5, 2023, at 3:58 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 11:43:11AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>>
>> In the past, LOOPBACK and NONE (tunnel) devices had all-zero MAC
>> addresses. siw_device_create() would fall back to copying the
>> device's name in those cases, because an all-zero MAC address breaks
>> the RDMA core IP-to-device lookup mechanism.
>
> Why not just make up a dummy address in SIW? It shouldn't need to leak
> out of it.. It is just some artifact of how the iWarp stuff has been
> designed
So that approach is already being done in siw_device_create(),
even though it is broken (the device name hasn't been initialized
when the phony MAC is created, so it is all zeroes). I've fixed
that and it still doesn't help.
siw cannot modify the underlying net_device to add a made-up
MAC address.
The core address resolution code wants to find an L2 address
for the egress device. The underlying ib_device, where a made-up
GID might be stored, is not involved with address resolution
AFAICT.
tun devices have no L2 address. Neither do loopback devices,
but address resolution makes an exception for LOOPBACK devices
by redirecting to a local physical Ethernet device.
Redirecting tun traffic to the local Ethernet device seems
dodgy at best.
I wasn't sure that an L2 address was required for siw before,
but now I'm pretty confident that it is required by our
implementation.
--
Chuck Lever
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-23 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-05 15:41 [PATCH RFC 0/3] siw on tunnel devices Chuck Lever
2023-05-05 15:42 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] net/tun: Ensure tun devices have a MAC address Chuck Lever
2023-05-05 16:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-05 17:09 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-05 15:42 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] net/lo: Ensure lo " Chuck Lever
2023-05-05 16:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-05 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] RDMA/siw: Require non-zero 6-byte MACs for soft iWARP Chuck Lever
2023-05-05 19:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-05 20:03 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-06 18:05 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-23 19:18 ` Chuck Lever III [this message]
2023-05-23 19:44 ` Tom Talpey
2023-05-23 22:50 ` Chuck Lever III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7825F977-3F62-4AFC-92F2-233C5EAE01D3@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=BMT@zurich.ibm.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox