Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf/selftests: add simple selftest for bpf_smc_ops

["D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>]

On 11/26/24 7:32 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 11/25/24 2:52 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>>> # ./test_progs -t smc
>>>> #27/1    bpf_smc/load:OK
>>>> #27      bpf_smc:OK
>>>> Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>>>>
>>>> The above command is based on several kernel modules. After these dependent kernel modules are 
>>>> loaded, then can run the above command successfully.
> 
>>>
>>> This is indeed a problem, a better way may be to create a separate testing directory for SMC, and 
>>> we are trying to do this.
>>
>> Got it. In the latest patch series, if a test program in sample/bpf can verify this bpf feature, 
>> it is better than a selftest program in the directory tools/ testing/selftests/bpf.
>>
>> I delved into this selftest tool. It seems that this selftest tool only makes the basic checks. A 
>> test program in sample/bpf can do more.
> 
> sample(s)/bpf? No new test should be added to samples/bpf which is obsolete. The bpf CI only runs 
> tests under selftests/bpf.
> 
> There is selftests/bpf/config to tell the bpf CI about what kconfig needs to turn on.

Is it acceptable to add a new kconfig to selftests/bpf/config? I don't know that...

To solve the compilation problem of this test, we originally planned to add a separate testing 
directory to SMC. If adding a new kconfig is acceptable, it will make this patch simpler.

Best wishes,
D. Wythe