Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf/selftests: add simple selftest for bpf_smc_ops

[Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>]

On 11/25/24 2:52 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>> # ./test_progs -t smc
>>> #27/1    bpf_smc/load:OK
>>> #27      bpf_smc:OK
>>> Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>>>
>>> The above command is based on several kernel modules. After these dependent 
>>> kernel modules are loaded, then can run the above command successfully.

>>
>> This is indeed a problem, a better way may be to create a separate testing 
>> directory for SMC, and we are trying to do this.
> 
> Got it. In the latest patch series, if a test program in sample/bpf can verify 
> this bpf feature, it is better than a selftest program in the directory tools/ 
> testing/selftests/bpf.
> 
> I delved into this selftest tool. It seems that this selftest tool only makes 
> the basic checks. A test program in sample/bpf can do more.

sample(s)/bpf? No new test should be added to samples/bpf which is obsolete. The 
bpf CI only runs tests under selftests/bpf.

There is selftests/bpf/config to tell the bpf CI about what kconfig needs to 
turn on.