From: Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@bytedance.com>
To: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
anup@brainfault.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
palmer@dabbelt.com
Cc: lihangjing@bytedance.com, xieyongji@bytedance.com,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] irqchip/riscv-intc: Balance priority and fairness during irq handling
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 23:09:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250113150933.65121-2-luxu.kernel@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250113150933.65121-1-luxu.kernel@bytedance.com>
Both csr cause and csr topi record the pending bit with the highest
priority. If interrupts with high priority arrive frequently within a
certain period of time, the interrupts with low priority won't get a
chance to be handled.
For example, if external interrupts and software interrupts arrive very
frequently, the timer interrupts will never be handled. Then buddy
watchdog on a buddy CPU will report a hardlockup on the current CPU while
current CPU actually can receive irq.
This commit solves this problem by handling all pending irqs in a round.
During each round, this commit handles pending irqs by their priority.
Signed-off-by: Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@bytedance.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
index f653c13de62b..bc2ec26aa9e9 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
@@ -26,20 +26,40 @@ static unsigned int riscv_intc_nr_irqs __ro_after_init = BITS_PER_LONG;
static unsigned int riscv_intc_custom_base __ro_after_init = BITS_PER_LONG;
static unsigned int riscv_intc_custom_nr_irqs __ro_after_init;
+static unsigned int riscv_prio_irqs[] = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE
+ IRQ_M_EXT, IRQ_M_SOFT, IRQ_M_TIMER,
+#endif
+ IRQ_S_EXT, IRQ_S_SOFT, IRQ_S_TIMER, IRQ_S_GEXT,
+ IRQ_VS_EXT, IRQ_VS_SOFT, IRQ_VS_TIMER,
+ IRQ_PMU_OVF,
+};
+
static void riscv_intc_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- unsigned long cause = regs->cause & ~CAUSE_IRQ_FLAG;
-
- if (generic_handle_domain_irq(intc_domain, cause))
- pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to handle interrupt (cause: %ld)\n", cause);
+ unsigned long pending = csr_read(CSR_IP) & csr_read(CSR_IE);
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_prio_irqs); i++)
+ if (pending & (1UL << riscv_prio_irqs[i]))
+ if (generic_handle_domain_irq(intc_domain, riscv_prio_irqs[i]))
+ pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to handle interrupt (cause: %u)\n",
+ riscv_prio_irqs[i]);
}
static void riscv_intc_aia_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long topi;
+ unsigned long pending;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ while ((topi = csr_read(CSR_TOPI))) {
+ pending = csr_read(CSR_IP) & csr_read(CSR_IE);
- while ((topi = csr_read(CSR_TOPI)))
- generic_handle_domain_irq(intc_domain, topi >> TOPI_IID_SHIFT);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_prio_irqs); i++)
+ if (pending & (1UL << riscv_prio_irqs[i]))
+ generic_handle_domain_irq(intc_domain, riscv_prio_irqs[i]);
+ }
}
/*
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 15:09 [PATCH 0/5] riscv: irqchip: Optimization of interrupt handling Xu Lu
2025-01-13 15:09 ` Xu Lu [this message]
2025-01-15 11:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] irqchip/riscv-intc: Balance priority and fairness during irq handling Anup Patel
2025-01-15 12:37 ` [External] " Xu Lu
2025-01-15 17:01 ` Anup Patel
2025-01-16 2:26 ` Xu Lu
2025-01-13 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/5] irqchip/riscv-imsic: Add a threshold to ext irq handling times Xu Lu
2025-01-13 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] irqchip/riscv-imsic: Use wmb() to order normal writes and IPI writes Xu Lu
2025-01-14 4:34 ` Anup Patel
2025-01-14 6:39 ` [External] " Xu Lu
2025-01-14 8:58 ` Anup Patel
2025-01-14 9:07 ` Xu Lu
2025-01-13 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqchip/timer-clint: " Xu Lu
2025-01-14 4:34 ` Anup Patel
2025-01-13 15:09 ` [PATCH 5/5] irqchip/aclint-sswi: " Xu Lu
2025-01-14 4:34 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250113150933.65121-2-luxu.kernel@bytedance.com \
--to=luxu.kernel@bytedance.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=lihangjing@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox