* migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug?
@ 2011-07-26 8:59 Yong Zhang
2011-07-27 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yong Zhang @ 2011-07-26 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
When reading the code, I'm afraid there is a race between migrate_disable()
and cpu hotplug. A scenario will like below:
CPU0 CPU1
_cpu_down();
cpu_unplug_begin();
wait_for_completion()
sync_unplug_thread();
complete();
race_window? /*
* migrate_disable() will
* not take effect since
* hotplug is in progress
*/
__stop_machine();
I think it could happen but maybe I'm missing something.
Thanks,
Yong
--
Only stand for myself
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug? 2011-07-26 8:59 migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug? Yong Zhang @ 2011-07-27 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner 2011-07-28 3:16 ` Yong Zhang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2011-07-27 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yong Zhang; +Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Yong Zhang wrote: > When reading the code, I'm afraid there is a race between migrate_disable() > and cpu hotplug. A scenario will like below: > > CPU0 CPU1 > _cpu_down(); > cpu_unplug_begin(); > wait_for_completion() > sync_unplug_thread(); > complete(); > race_window? /* > * migrate_disable() will > * not take effect since > * hotplug is in progress > */ Rightfully so. The caller will just block on the cpu_hotplug.lock mutex until the unplug operation will be done. Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug? 2011-07-27 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner @ 2011-07-28 3:16 ` Yong Zhang 2011-07-28 6:55 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Yong Zhang @ 2011-07-28 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:52:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Yong Zhang wrote: > > > When reading the code, I'm afraid there is a race between migrate_disable() > > and cpu hotplug. A scenario will like below: > > > > CPU0 CPU1 > > _cpu_down(); > > cpu_unplug_begin(); > > wait_for_completion() > > sync_unplug_thread(); > > complete(); > > race_window? /* > > * migrate_disable() will > > * not take effect since > > * hotplug is in progress > > */ > > Rightfully so. The caller will just block on the cpu_hotplug.lock > mutex until the unplug operation will be done. Yup, just notice the mutex_lock/mutex_unlock in pin_current_cpu(). But if the caller block on mutex_lock() then waked up, it's possible that it's been migrated to another cpu. So in the 'retry' loop, we should reget hotplug_pcp. Code like below? Thanks, Yong --- From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH] kernel/cpu.c: re-acquire hotplug_pcp when pin_current_cpu() retry When 'retry' happen, it's possible that the task has been migrated to other cpu, and 'hotplug_pcp' is still pointing to the stale one. Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> --- kernel/cpu.c | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 53dd7ad..5f2382a 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -75,9 +75,11 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hotplug_pcp, hotplug_pcp); */ void pin_current_cpu(void) { - struct hotplug_pcp *hp = &__get_cpu_var(hotplug_pcp); + struct hotplug_pcp *hp; retry: + hp = &__get_cpu_var(hotplug_pcp); + if (!hp->unplug || hp->refcount || preempt_count() > 1 || hp->unplug == current || (current->flags & PF_STOMPER)) { hp->refcount++; -- 1.7.4.1 -- Only stand for myself ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug? 2011-07-28 3:16 ` Yong Zhang @ 2011-07-28 6:55 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2011-07-28 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yong Zhang; +Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:52:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Yong Zhang wrote: > > > > > When reading the code, I'm afraid there is a race between migrate_disable() > > > and cpu hotplug. A scenario will like below: > > > > > > CPU0 CPU1 > > > _cpu_down(); > > > cpu_unplug_begin(); > > > wait_for_completion() > > > sync_unplug_thread(); > > > complete(); > > > race_window? /* > > > * migrate_disable() will > > > * not take effect since > > > * hotplug is in progress > > > */ > > > > Rightfully so. The caller will just block on the cpu_hotplug.lock > > mutex until the unplug operation will be done. > > Yup, just notice the mutex_lock/mutex_unlock in pin_current_cpu(). > > But if the caller block on mutex_lock() then waked up, it's possible > that it's been migrated to another cpu. So in the 'retry' loop, we > should reget hotplug_pcp. Ooops, that was the original plan. I somehow managed to fatfinger that. Good catch. Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-28 6:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-07-26 8:59 migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug? Yong Zhang 2011-07-27 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner 2011-07-28 3:16 ` Yong Zhang 2011-07-28 6:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox