public inbox for linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug?
@ 2011-07-26  8:59 Yong Zhang
  2011-07-27 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yong Zhang @ 2011-07-26  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar

When reading the code, I'm afraid there is a race between migrate_disable()
and cpu hotplug. A scenario will like below:

	CPU0			CPU1
_cpu_down();
  cpu_unplug_begin();
    wait_for_completion()
  			sync_unplug_thread();
			  complete();
			race_window? /*
				      * migrate_disable() will
				      * not take effect since
				      * hotplug is in progress
				      */

  __stop_machine();

I think it could happen but maybe I'm missing something.

Thanks,
Yong


-- 
Only stand for myself

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug?
  2011-07-26  8:59 migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug? Yong Zhang
@ 2011-07-27 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
  2011-07-28  3:16   ` Yong Zhang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2011-07-27 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yong Zhang; +Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Yong Zhang wrote:

> When reading the code, I'm afraid there is a race between migrate_disable()
> and cpu hotplug. A scenario will like below:
> 
> 	CPU0			CPU1
> _cpu_down();
>   cpu_unplug_begin();
>     wait_for_completion()
>   			sync_unplug_thread();
> 			  complete();
> 			race_window? /*
> 				      * migrate_disable() will
> 				      * not take effect since
> 				      * hotplug is in progress
> 				      */

Rightfully so. The caller will just block on the cpu_hotplug.lock
mutex until the unplug operation will be done.

Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug?
  2011-07-27 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2011-07-28  3:16   ` Yong Zhang
  2011-07-28  6:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yong Zhang @ 2011-07-28  3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:52:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Yong Zhang wrote:
> 
> > When reading the code, I'm afraid there is a race between migrate_disable()
> > and cpu hotplug. A scenario will like below:
> > 
> > 	CPU0			CPU1
> > _cpu_down();
> >   cpu_unplug_begin();
> >     wait_for_completion()
> >   			sync_unplug_thread();
> > 			  complete();
> > 			race_window? /*
> > 				      * migrate_disable() will
> > 				      * not take effect since
> > 				      * hotplug is in progress
> > 				      */
> 
> Rightfully so. The caller will just block on the cpu_hotplug.lock
> mutex until the unplug operation will be done.

Yup, just notice the mutex_lock/mutex_unlock in pin_current_cpu().

But if the caller block on mutex_lock() then waked up, it's possible
that it's been migrated to another cpu. So in the 'retry' loop, we
should reget hotplug_pcp.

Code like below?

Thanks,
Yong

---
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/cpu.c: re-acquire hotplug_pcp when pin_current_cpu() retry

When 'retry' happen, it's possible that the task has been
migrated to other cpu, and 'hotplug_pcp' is still pointing to
the stale one.

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/cpu.c |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 53dd7ad..5f2382a 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -75,9 +75,11 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hotplug_pcp, hotplug_pcp);
  */
 void pin_current_cpu(void)
 {
-	struct hotplug_pcp *hp = &__get_cpu_var(hotplug_pcp);
+	struct hotplug_pcp *hp;
 
 retry:
+	hp = &__get_cpu_var(hotplug_pcp);
+
 	if (!hp->unplug || hp->refcount || preempt_count() > 1 ||
 	    hp->unplug == current || (current->flags & PF_STOMPER)) {
 		hp->refcount++;
-- 
1.7.4.1

-- 
Only stand for myself

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug?
  2011-07-28  3:16   ` Yong Zhang
@ 2011-07-28  6:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2011-07-28  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yong Zhang; +Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Yong Zhang wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:52:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > 
> > > When reading the code, I'm afraid there is a race between migrate_disable()
> > > and cpu hotplug. A scenario will like below:
> > > 
> > > 	CPU0			CPU1
> > > _cpu_down();
> > >   cpu_unplug_begin();
> > >     wait_for_completion()
> > >   			sync_unplug_thread();
> > > 			  complete();
> > > 			race_window? /*
> > > 				      * migrate_disable() will
> > > 				      * not take effect since
> > > 				      * hotplug is in progress
> > > 				      */
> > 
> > Rightfully so. The caller will just block on the cpu_hotplug.lock
> > mutex until the unplug operation will be done.
> 
> Yup, just notice the mutex_lock/mutex_unlock in pin_current_cpu().
> 
> But if the caller block on mutex_lock() then waked up, it's possible
> that it's been migrated to another cpu. So in the 'retry' loop, we
> should reget hotplug_pcp.

Ooops, that was the original plan. I somehow managed to fatfinger
that. Good catch.
 
Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-28  6:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-26  8:59 migrate_disable() race with cpu hotplug? Yong Zhang
2011-07-27 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-28  3:16   ` Yong Zhang
2011-07-28  6:55     ` Thomas Gleixner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox