From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, vneethv@linux.ibm.com,
oberpar@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/21] KVM: s390: pci: do initial setup for AEN interpretation
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:43:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a8848fb-73b3-97aa-4147-9a647ceb2397@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c405e8de-5f6b-d33d-15e3-c4453e0348fe@linux.ibm.com>
On 4/19/22 4:16 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
> On 4/4/22 19:43, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> Initial setup for Adapter Event Notification Interpretation for zPCI
>> passthrough devices. Specifically, allocate a structure for
>> forwarding of
>> adapter events and pass the address of this structure to firmware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
...
>> +
>> +static int zpci_reset_aipb(u8 nisc)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * AEN registration can only happen once per system boot. If
>> + * an aipb already exists then AEN was already registered and
>> + * we can re-use the aipb contents. This can only happen if
>> + * the KVM module was removed and re-inserted.
>> + */
>> + if (zpci_aipb->aipb.faal != ZPCI_NR_DEVICES ||
>> + zpci_aipb->aipb.afi != nisc) {
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> I do not understand how faal cound be different of ZPCI_NR_DEVICES if
> aipb has been already initialised.
> Same for afi.
> Can you please explain?
Well, my concern was along the lines of 'what if we rmmod kvm and then
insmod a different version of the kvm module' -- These are really sanity
checks.
Now, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES/faal is built in with PCI, so yeah this check is
probably unnecessary as we shouldn't be able to change this value
without a new kernel.
afi is however derived from nisc, which was passed in all the way from
kvm_s390_gib_init during kvm_arch_init. Today, this is hard-coded as
GAL_ISC; but the point is that this is hard-coded within the kvm module,
so we can't be quite sure that it's the same value every time we insmod
kvm. In an (admittedly, far-fetched) scenario where we insmod kvm,
initialize AEN with GAL_ISC, rmmod kvm, then insmod a kvm where, for
example, GAL_ISC was changed to a different number, we would need to
trigger a failure here because we have no way to update the forwarding
isc with firmware until the kernel is rebooted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-20 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-04 17:43 [PATCH v5 00/21] KVM: s390: enable zPCI for interpretive execution Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 01/21] s390/sclp: detect the zPCI load/store interpretation facility Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 02/21] s390/sclp: detect the AISII facility Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 03/21] s390/sclp: detect the AENI facility Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 04/21] s390/sclp: detect the AISI facility Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 05/21] s390/airq: pass more TPI info to airq handlers Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 06/21] s390/airq: allow for airq structure that uses an input vector Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 07/21] s390/pci: externalize the SIC operation controls and routine Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 08/21] s390/pci: stash associated GISA designation Matthew Rosato
2022-04-05 8:03 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-12 16:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-04-19 7:54 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 09/21] s390/pci: stash dtsm and maxstbl Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 10/21] KVM: s390: pci: add basic kvm_zdev structure Matthew Rosato
2022-04-05 8:20 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-05 13:51 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-12 16:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-04-19 7:55 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 11/21] KVM: s390: pci: do initial setup for AEN interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-04-14 7:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-04-14 13:00 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 8:16 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 13:43 ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 12/21] KVM: s390: pci: enable host forwarding of Adapter Event Notifications Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 9:21 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 13/21] KVM: s390: mechanism to enable guest zPCI Interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 9:30 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 14/21] KVM: s390: pci: provide routines for enabling/disabling interrupt forwarding Matthew Rosato
2022-04-05 13:39 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-05 13:48 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-05 15:06 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-08 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-11 12:19 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 15/21] KVM: s390: pci: add routines to start/stop interpretive execution Matthew Rosato
2022-04-08 12:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-12 13:14 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-12 13:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 16/21] KVM: vfio: add s390x hook to register KVM guest designation Matthew Rosato
2022-04-08 12:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-12 13:39 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-12 13:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-12 14:32 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 17/21] vfio-pci/zdev: add function handle to clp base capability Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 9:40 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 18/21] vfio-pci/zdev: different maxstbl for interpreted devices Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 9:41 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 19/21] KVM: s390: add KVM_S390_ZPCI_OP to manage guest zPCI devices Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 10:07 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 14:10 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-20 18:18 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 20/21] KVM: s390: introduce CPU feature for zPCI Interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 10:08 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v5 21/21] MAINTAINERS: additional files related kvm s390 pci passthrough Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a8848fb-73b3-97aa-4147-9a647ceb2397@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox