From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hbabu@us.ibm.com, oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp, horms@verge.net.au,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 04/10] kdump: Trigger kdump via panic notifier chain on s390
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:37:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1312274279.4881.18.camel@br98xy6r> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110801204114.GJ3805@redhat.com>
Hello Vivek,
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 16:41 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:55:08PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > On s390 we have the possibility to configure actions that are executed in
> > case of a kernel panic. E.g. it is possible to automatically trigger an s390
> > stand-alone dump. The actions are called via a panic notifier. We also want
> > to trigger kdump via the notifier call chain. Therefore this patch disables
> > for s390 the direct kdump invocation in the panic() function.
>
> Doesn't this reduce the reliability of the operation as you are assuming
> that panic notifier list is fine and not corrupted.
Yes, this is correct. We have to rely that the notifier list is fine.
Probably there is still room for improvement here.
> There might be other generic notifiers registerd on panic notifier list
> too. So in your case, are there multiple subsystem registering for panic
> notifiers? If not, why not call crash_kexec() directly. Are there any
> other actions you want to take on panic then calling crash_kexec()?
We have added the panic notifier in the past in order to be able to
configure the action that should be done in case of panic using our
shutdown actions infrastructure. We can configure the action using sysfs
and we are able to configure that a stand-alone dump should be started
as action for panic.
Now with the two stage dump approach we would like to keep the
possibility to trigger a stand-alone dump even if kdump is installed.
The stand-alone dumper will be started in case of a kernel panic and
then the procedure we discussed will happen: Jump into kdump and if
program check occurs do stand-alone dump as backup.
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-27 12:55 [patch v2 00/10] kdump: Patch series for s390 support (version 2) Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 01/10] kdump: Add KEXEC_CRASH_CONTROL_MEMORY_LIMIT Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 9:51 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 19:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 9:27 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 02/10] kdump: Make kimage_load_crash_segment() weak Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 9:30 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 18:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 10:41 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-04 20:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 03/10] kdump: Add size to elfcorehdr kernel parameter Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 9:08 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 18:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 10:40 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 04/10] kdump: Trigger kdump via panic notifier chain on s390 Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 8:37 ` Michael Holzheu [this message]
2011-08-02 19:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 9:50 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-04 21:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-08 17:47 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-09 21:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 05/10] s390: Add PSW restart shutdown trigger Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 8:05 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 06/10] s390: Export store_status() function Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 07/10] s390: Use diagnose 308 for system reset Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 08/10] s390: Add real memory access functions Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 09/10] s390: kdump backend code Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 10/10] kexec-tools: Add s390 kdump support Michael Holzheu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1312274279.4881.18.camel@br98xy6r \
--to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox