From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hbabu@us.ibm.com, oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp, horms@verge.net.au,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 03/10] kdump: Add size to elfcorehdr kernel parameter
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:08:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1312276087.4881.24.camel@br98xy6r> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110801203607.GI3805@redhat.com>
Hello Vivek,
#On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 16:36 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:55:07PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Currently only the address of the pre-allocated ELF header is passed with
> > the elfcorehdr= kernel parameter. In order to reserve memory for the header
> > in the 2nd kernel also the size is required. To pass the size with this
> > patch the syntax of the kernel parameter is extended as follows:
> >
> > elfcorehdr=[size[KMG]@]offset[KMG]
> >
> > This change is backward compatible because elfcorehdr=size is still allowed.
>
> Generally vmcore parses elfcorehdr to figure out the sizes. kexec-tools
> knows about it and relevant memory is excluded from second kernel's map
> with the help of memmap= command line option.
>
> Can you please mention that this is only s390 specific requirement as
> there are no memmap= equivalent options and somehow dump tools wants
> to know how big the elf header size is?
I updated the description:
Currently only the address of the pre-allocated ELF header is passed with
the elfcorehdr= kernel parameter. In order to reserve memory for the header
in the 2nd kernel also the size is required. Current kdump architecture
backends use different methods to do that, e.g. x86 uses the memmap= kernel
parameter. On s390 there is no easy way to transfer this information.
Therefore the elfcorehdr kernel parameter is extended to also pass the size.
This now can also be used as standard mechanism by all future kdump
architecture backends.
The syntax of the kernel parameter is extended as follows:
elfcorehdr=[size[KMG]@]offset[KMG]
This change is backward compatible because elfcorehdr=size is still allowed.
Ok?
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-27 12:55 [patch v2 00/10] kdump: Patch series for s390 support (version 2) Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 01/10] kdump: Add KEXEC_CRASH_CONTROL_MEMORY_LIMIT Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 9:51 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 19:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 9:27 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 02/10] kdump: Make kimage_load_crash_segment() weak Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 9:30 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 18:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 10:41 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-04 20:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 03/10] kdump: Add size to elfcorehdr kernel parameter Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 9:08 ` Michael Holzheu [this message]
2011-08-02 18:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 10:40 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 04/10] kdump: Trigger kdump via panic notifier chain on s390 Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 8:37 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 19:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 9:50 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-04 21:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-08 17:47 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-09 21:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 05/10] s390: Add PSW restart shutdown trigger Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02 8:05 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 06/10] s390: Export store_status() function Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 07/10] s390: Use diagnose 308 for system reset Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 08/10] s390: Add real memory access functions Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 09/10] s390: kdump backend code Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 10/10] kexec-tools: Add s390 kdump support Michael Holzheu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1312276087.4881.24.camel@br98xy6r \
--to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox