From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2 5/6] s390x: smp: Create and use a non-waiting CPU restart
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:43:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13970909-52c2-bb3d-3cfd-0c97100edb04@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220311173822.1234617-6-farman@linux.ibm.com>
On 3/11/22 18:38, Eric Farman wrote:
> The kvm-unit-tests infrastructure for a CPU restart waits for the
> SIGP RESTART to complete. In order to test the restart itself,
> create a variation that does not wait, and test the state of the
> CPU directly.
>
> While here, add some better report prefixes/messages, to clarify
> which condition is being examined (similar to test_stop_store_status()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/smp.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/s390x/smp.h | 1 +
> s390x/smp.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.c b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> index b69c0e09..5be29d36 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/smp.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,30 @@ int smp_cpu_restart(uint16_t idx)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Functionally equivalent to smp_cpu_restart(), but without the
> + * elements that wait/serialize matters here in the test.
> + * Used to see if KVM itself is serialized correctly.
> + */
> +int smp_cpu_restart_nowait(uint16_t idx)
> +{
> + check_idx(idx);
> +
> + spin_lock(&lock);
> +
> + /* Don't suppress a CC2 with sigp_retry() */
> + if (sigp(cpus[idx].addr, SIGP_RESTART, 0, NULL)) {
> + spin_unlock(&lock);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + cpus[idx].active = true;
> +
> + spin_unlock(&lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int smp_cpu_start(uint16_t idx, struct psw psw)
> {
> int rc;
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.h b/lib/s390x/smp.h
> index bae03dfd..24a0e2e0 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/smp.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ uint16_t smp_cpu_addr(uint16_t idx);
> bool smp_cpu_stopped(uint16_t idx);
> bool smp_sense_running_status(uint16_t idx);
> int smp_cpu_restart(uint16_t idx);
> +int smp_cpu_restart_nowait(uint16_t idx);
> int smp_cpu_start(uint16_t idx, struct psw psw);
> int smp_cpu_stop(uint16_t idx);
> int smp_cpu_stop_nowait(uint16_t idx);
> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
> index f70a9c54..913da155 100644
> --- a/s390x/smp.c
> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ static void test_restart(void)
> {
> struct cpu *cpu = smp_cpu_from_idx(1);
> struct lowcore *lc = cpu->lowcore;
> + int rc;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("restart");
> + report_prefix_push("stopped");
>
> lc->restart_new_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> lc->restart_new_psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
> @@ -61,17 +65,28 @@ static void test_restart(void)
> /* Make sure cpu is stopped */
> smp_cpu_stop(1);
> set_flag(0);
> - smp_cpu_restart(1);
> + rc = smp_cpu_restart_nowait(1);
> + report(!rc, "return code");
> + report(!smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu started");
> wait_for_flag();
> + report_pass("test flag");
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + report_prefix_push("running");
>
> /*
> * Wait until cpu 1 has set the flag because it executed the
> * restart function.
> */
> set_flag(0);
> - smp_cpu_restart(1);
> + rc = smp_cpu_restart_nowait(1);
> + report(!rc, "return code");
> + report(!smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu started");
> wait_for_flag();
> - report_pass("restart while running");
> + report_pass("test flag");
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + report_prefix_pop();
> }
>
> static void test_stop(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 17:38 [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2 0/6] s390x SIGP fixes Eric Farman
2022-03-11 17:38 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2 1/6] lib: s390x: smp: Retry SIGP SENSE on CC2 Eric Farman
2022-03-24 8:08 ` Thomas Huth
2022-03-11 17:38 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2 2/6] s390x: smp: Test SIGP RESTART against stopped CPU Eric Farman
2022-03-24 8:15 ` Thomas Huth
2022-03-11 17:38 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2 3/6] s390x: smp: Fix checks for SIGP STOP STORE STATUS Eric Farman
2022-03-15 6:39 ` Nico Boehr
2022-03-15 17:39 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-11 17:38 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2 4/6] s390x: smp: Create and use a non-waiting CPU stop Eric Farman
2022-03-15 6:45 ` Nico Boehr
2022-03-11 17:38 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2 5/6] s390x: smp: Create and use a non-waiting CPU restart Eric Farman
2022-03-15 6:51 ` Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 7:43 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2022-03-11 17:38 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2 6/6] lib: s390x: smp: Remove smp_sigp_retry Eric Farman
2022-03-15 7:20 ` Nico Boehr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13970909-52c2-bb3d-3cfd-0c97100edb04@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox