public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
	Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>,
	nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Stefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com>,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/7] block: loop: don't hold lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open
Date: Wed,  8 Apr 2015 23:52:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428508384-29008-3-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428508384-29008-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>

The lo_ctl_mutex is held for running all ioctl handlers, and
in some ioctl handlers, ioctl_by_bdev(BLKRRPART) is called for
rereading partitions, which requires bd_mutex.

So it is easy to cause failure because trylock(bd_mutex) may
fail inside blkdev_reread_part(), and follows the lock context:

blkid or other application:
	->open()
		->mutex_lock(bd_mutex)
		->lo_open()
			->mutex_lock(lo_ctl_mutex)

losetup(set fd ioctl):
	->mutex_lock(lo_ctl_mutex)
	->ioctl_by_bdev(BLKRRPART)
		->trylock(bd_mutex)

This patch trys to eliminate the ABBA lock dependency by removing
lo_ctl_mutext in lo_open() with the following approach:

1) make lo_refcnt as atomic_t and avoid acquiring lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open():
	- for open vs. add/del loop, no any problem because of loop_index_mutex
	- freeze request queue during clr_fd, so I/O can't come until
	  clearing fd is completed, like the effect of holding lo_ctl_mutex
	  in lo_open
	- both open() and release() have been serialized by bd_mutex already

2) don't hold lo_ctl_mutex for decreasing/checking lo_refcnt in
lo_release(), then lo_ctl_mutex is only required for the last release.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/block/loop.c |   19 +++++++++++--------
 drivers/block/loop.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index c4fd1e4..0d9f014 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
 	 * <dev>/do something like mkfs/losetup -d <dev> causing the losetup -d
 	 * command to fail with EBUSY.
 	 */
-	if (lo->lo_refcnt > 1) {
+	if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 1) {
 		lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR;
 		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
 		return 0;
@@ -890,6 +890,9 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
 	if (filp == NULL)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* freeze request queue during the transition */
+	blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
+
 	spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
 	lo->lo_state = Lo_rundown;
 	lo->lo_backing_file = NULL;
@@ -921,6 +924,8 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
 	lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
 	/* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
 	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
+	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
+
 	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev)
 		ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
 	lo->lo_flags = 0;
@@ -1378,9 +1383,7 @@ static int lo_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
-	lo->lo_refcnt++;
-	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
+	atomic_inc(&lo->lo_refcnt);
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
 	return err;
@@ -1391,11 +1394,10 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
 	struct loop_device *lo = disk->private_data;
 	int err;
 
-	mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
-
-	if (--lo->lo_refcnt)
+	if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
 		goto out;
 
+	mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
 	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
 		/*
 		 * In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread
@@ -1648,6 +1650,7 @@ static int loop_add(struct loop_device **l, int i)
 		disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
 	disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT;
 	mutex_init(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
+	atomic_set(&lo->lo_refcnt, 0);
 	lo->lo_number		= i;
 	spin_lock_init(&lo->lo_lock);
 	disk->major		= LOOP_MAJOR;
@@ -1765,7 +1768,7 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
 			mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
 			break;
 		}
-		if (lo->lo_refcnt > 0) {
+		if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 0) {
 			ret = -EBUSY;
 			mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
 			break;
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.h b/drivers/block/loop.h
index 301c27f..ffb6dd6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.h
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct loop_func_table;
 
 struct loop_device {
 	int		lo_number;
-	int		lo_refcnt;
+	atomic_t	lo_refcnt;
 	loff_t		lo_offset;
 	loff_t		lo_sizelimit;
 	int		lo_flags;
-- 
1.7.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-08 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-08 15:52 [PATCH v1 0/7] block: reread partitions changes and fix for loop Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] block: export blkdev_reread_part() and __blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:52 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] block: loop: fix another reread part failure Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] block: nbd: convert to blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] block: dasd_genhd: convert to blkdev_reread_part Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] block: replace trylock with mutex_lock in blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] s390/block/dasd: remove obsolete while -EBUSY loop Ming Lei
2015-04-08 17:32   ` Sebastian Ott
2015-04-08 18:00     ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-09  1:06       ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08 16:52 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] block: reread partitions changes and fix for loop Jarod Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1428508384-29008-3-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --to=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox