From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>,
nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Stefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Weinhuber <wein@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] s390/block/dasd: remove obsolete while -EBUSY loop
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:32:24 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1504081924120.1757@denkbrett> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428508384-29008-8-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Ming Lei wrote:
> From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
>
> With the mutex_trylock bit gone from blkdev_reread_part(), the retry logic
> in dasd_scan_partitions() shouldn't be necessary.
>
> CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> CC: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> CC: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
> CC: Stefan Weinhuber <wein@de.ibm.com>
> CC: Stefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com>
> CC: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
> CC: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> CC: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> CC: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> CC: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c | 13 +++----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
> index 2af4619..189ea2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
> @@ -99,9 +99,8 @@ void dasd_gendisk_free(struct dasd_block *block)
> int dasd_scan_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
> {
> struct block_device *bdev;
> - int retry, rc;
> + int rc;
>
> - retry = 5;
> bdev = bdget_disk(block->gdp, 0);
> if (!bdev) {
> DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base, "%s",
> @@ -118,14 +117,8 @@ int dasd_scan_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
> }
>
> rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
> - while (rc == -EBUSY && retry > 0) {
> - schedule();
> - rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
> - retry--;
> - DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base,
> - "scan partitions error, retry %d rc %d",
> - retry, rc);
> - }
> + DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base,
> + "scan partitions error, rc %d", rc);
Could you please change that to only write the debug message in the error
case. Other than that, both dasd patches look good.
Thanks,
Sebastian
>
> /*
> * Since the matching blkdev_put call to the blkdev_get in
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-08 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 15:52 [PATCH v1 0/7] block: reread partitions changes and fix for loop Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] block: export blkdev_reread_part() and __blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] block: loop: don't hold lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] block: loop: fix another reread part failure Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] block: nbd: convert to blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] block: dasd_genhd: convert to blkdev_reread_part Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] block: replace trylock with mutex_lock in blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] s390/block/dasd: remove obsolete while -EBUSY loop Ming Lei
2015-04-08 17:32 ` Sebastian Ott [this message]
2015-04-08 18:00 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-09 1:06 ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08 16:52 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] block: reread partitions changes and fix for loop Jarod Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.11.1504081924120.1757@denkbrett \
--to=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
--cc=fabf@skynet.be \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
--cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wein@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox