From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
dominik.dingel@gmail.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 14/22] s390/mm: Make protect_rmap EDAT1 compatible
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 23:29:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1510007400-42493-15-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510007400-42493-1-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
When shadowing, we must make sure, that any changes to the GMAP inside
guest N will also be directly reflected in our shadow GMAP. This is
done by write-protecting guest N memory at the places where it stores
DAT tables for guest N + 1.
This still lacks EDAT1 support, so let's add it.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
index c8296bc..f6a28d9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
@@ -1289,6 +1289,56 @@ static inline void gmap_insert_rmap(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long vmaddr,
}
}
+static int gmap_protect_rmap_large(struct gmap *sg, struct gmap_rmap *rmap,
+ unsigned long paddr, unsigned long vmaddr,
+ pmd_t *pmdp, int prot)
+{
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ /* We have no upper segment, let's go back and fix this up. */
+ if (pmd_val(*pmdp) & _SEGMENT_ENTRY_INVALID)
+ return -EAGAIN;
+
+ spin_lock(&sg->guest_table_lock);
+ rc = gmap_protect_large(sg->parent, paddr, pmdp,
+ prot, GMAP_ENTRY_VSIE);
+ if (!rc)
+ gmap_insert_rmap(sg, vmaddr & HPAGE_MASK, rmap);
+
+ spin_unlock(&sg->guest_table_lock);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static int gmap_protect_rmap_pte(struct gmap *sg, struct gmap_rmap *rmap,
+ unsigned long paddr, unsigned long vmaddr,
+ pmd_t *pmdp, int prot)
+{
+ int rc = 0;
+ pte_t *ptep = NULL;
+ spinlock_t *ptl = NULL;
+
+ /* We have no upper segment, let's go back and fix this up. */
+ if (pmd_val(*pmdp) & _SEGMENT_ENTRY_INVALID)
+ return -EAGAIN;
+
+ if (gmap_is_shadow(sg->parent))
+ ptep = pte_offset_map(pmdp, paddr);
+ else
+ ptep = pte_alloc_map_lock(sg->parent->mm, pmdp, paddr, &ptl);
+
+ if (ptep) {
+ spin_lock(&sg->guest_table_lock);
+ rc = ptep_force_prot(sg->parent->mm, paddr, ptep, prot,
+ PGSTE_VSIE_BIT);
+ if (!rc)
+ gmap_insert_rmap(sg, vmaddr, rmap);
+ spin_unlock(&sg->guest_table_lock);
+ if (ptl)
+ gmap_pte_op_end(ptl);
+ }
+ return rc;
+}
+
/**
* gmap_protect_rmap - modify access rights to memory and create an rmap
* @sg: pointer to the shadow guest address space structure
@@ -1306,8 +1356,7 @@ static int gmap_protect_rmap(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long raddr,
struct gmap *parent;
struct gmap_rmap *rmap;
unsigned long vmaddr;
- spinlock_t *ptl;
- pte_t *ptep;
+ pmd_t *pmdp;
int rc;
BUG_ON(!gmap_is_shadow(sg));
@@ -1326,15 +1375,24 @@ static int gmap_protect_rmap(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long raddr,
return rc;
}
rc = -EAGAIN;
- ptep = gmap_pte_op_walk(parent, paddr, &ptl);
- if (ptep) {
- spin_lock(&sg->guest_table_lock);
- rc = ptep_force_prot(parent->mm, paddr, ptep, prot,
- GMAP_ENTRY_VSIE);
- if (!rc)
- gmap_insert_rmap(sg, vmaddr, rmap);
- spin_unlock(&sg->guest_table_lock);
- gmap_pte_op_end(ptl);
+ pmdp = gmap_pmd_op_walk(parent, paddr);
+ if (pmdp) {
+ if (!pmd_large(*pmdp)) {
+ rc = gmap_protect_rmap_pte(sg, rmap, paddr,
+ vmaddr, pmdp, prot);
+ if (!rc) {
+ paddr += PAGE_SIZE;
+ len -= PAGE_SIZE;
+ }
+ } else {
+ rc = gmap_protect_rmap_large(sg, rmap, paddr,
+ vmaddr, pmdp, prot);
+ if (!rc) {
+ len = len < HPAGE_SIZE ? 0 : len - HPAGE_SIZE;
+ paddr = (paddr & HPAGE_MASK) + HPAGE_SIZE;
+ }
+ }
+ gmap_pmd_op_end(parent, pmdp);
}
radix_tree_preload_end();
if (rc) {
@@ -1344,8 +1402,6 @@ static int gmap_protect_rmap(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long raddr,
return rc;
continue;
}
- paddr += PAGE_SIZE;
- len -= PAGE_SIZE;
}
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-06 22:29 [RFC/PATCH 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 01/22] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular Janosch Frank
2017-11-08 10:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-08 12:21 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-08 12:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 02/22] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting Janosch Frank
2017-11-10 12:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-13 15:57 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-17 9:02 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-17 9:19 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 04/22] s390/mm: Add gmap pmd invalidation and clearing Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 05/22] s390/mm: hugetlb pages within a gmap can not be freed Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 06/22] s390/mm: Introduce gmap_pmdp_xchg Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 07/22] RFC: s390/mm: Transfer guest pmd protection to host Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 08/22] s390/mm: Add huge page dirty sync support Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 09/22] s390/mm: clear huge page storage keys on enable_skey Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 10/22] s390/mm: Add huge pmd storage key handling Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 11/22] s390/mm: Remove superfluous parameter Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 12/22] s390/mm: Add gmap_protect_large read protection support Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 13/22] s390/mm: Make gmap_read_table EDAT1 compatible Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 15/22] s390/mm: GMAP read table extensions Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 16/22] s390/mm: Add shadow segment code Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 17/22] s390/mm: Add VSIE reverse fake case Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 18/22] s390/mm: Remove gmap_pte_op_walk Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 19/22] s390/mm: Split huge pages if granular protection is needed Janosch Frank
2017-12-07 16:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-08 7:00 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 20/22] s390/mm: Enable gmap huge pmd support Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 10:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-15 12:24 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 21/22] KVM: s390: Add KVM HPAGE capability Janosch Frank
2017-11-07 10:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-07 10:53 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 10:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-15 12:02 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:30 ` [RFC/PATCH 22/22] RFC: s390/mm: Add gmap lock classes Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 10:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-15 12:16 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1510007400-42493-15-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dominik.dingel@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox