From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
dominik.dingel@gmail.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 02/22] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 23:29:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1510007400-42493-3-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510007400-42493-1-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Currently we use the software PGSTE bits PGSTE_IN_BIT and PGSTE_VSIE_BIT
to notify before an invalidation occurs on a prefix page or a VSIE page
respectively. Both bits only work for a PGSTE, which only exists for
page tables.
For huge page support we also need such bits for segments (pmds) so
let's introduce abstract GMAP_ENTRY_* bits that will be realized into
the respective bits when gmap DAT table entries are protected.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h | 4 ++++
arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 13 ++++++++-----
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h
index 741ddba..f3d84a8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h
@@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
#ifndef _ASM_S390_GMAP_H
#define _ASM_S390_GMAP_H
+/* Generic bits for GMAP notification on DAT table entry changes. */
+#define GMAP_ENTRY_VSIE 0x2
+#define GMAP_ENTRY_IN 0x1
+
/**
* struct gmap_struct - guest address space
* @list: list head for the mm->context gmap list
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
index 9757242..74e2062 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
@@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ static inline void gmap_pmd_op_end(struct gmap *gmap, pmd_t *pmdp)
* @gaddr: virtual address in the guest address space
* @pmdp: pointer to the pmd associated with the pte
* @prot: indicates access rights: PROT_NONE, PROT_READ or PROT_WRITE
- * @bits: pgste notification bits to set
+ * @bits: notification bits to set
*
* Returns 0 if successfully protected, -ENOMEM if out of memory and
* -EAGAIN if a fixup is needed.
@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ static int gmap_protect_pte(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr,
int rc;
pte_t *ptep;
spinlock_t *ptl = NULL;
+ unsigned long pbits = 0;
/* We have no upper segment, let's go back and fix this up. */
if (pmd_val(*pmdp) & _SEGMENT_ENTRY_INVALID)
@@ -954,8 +955,10 @@ static int gmap_protect_pte(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr,
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ pbits |= (bits & GMAP_ENTRY_IN) ? PGSTE_IN_BIT : 0;
+ pbits |= (bits & GMAP_ENTRY_VSIE) ? PGSTE_VSIE_BIT : 0;
/* Protect and unlock. */
- rc = ptep_force_prot(gmap->mm, gaddr, ptep, prot, bits);
+ rc = ptep_force_prot(gmap->mm, gaddr, ptep, prot, pbits);
if (ptl)
gmap_pte_op_end(ptl);
return rc;
@@ -1031,7 +1034,7 @@ int gmap_mprotect_notify(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr,
if (!MACHINE_HAS_ESOP && prot == PROT_READ)
return -EINVAL;
down_read(&gmap->mm->mmap_sem);
- rc = gmap_protect_range(gmap, gaddr, len, prot, PGSTE_IN_BIT);
+ rc = gmap_protect_range(gmap, gaddr, len, prot, GMAP_ENTRY_IN);
up_read(&gmap->mm->mmap_sem);
return rc;
}
@@ -1153,7 +1156,7 @@ static int gmap_protect_rmap(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long raddr,
if (ptep) {
spin_lock(&sg->guest_table_lock);
rc = ptep_force_prot(parent->mm, paddr, ptep, prot,
- PGSTE_VSIE_BIT);
+ GMAP_ENTRY_VSIE);
if (!rc)
gmap_insert_rmap(sg, vmaddr, rmap);
spin_unlock(&sg->guest_table_lock);
@@ -1622,7 +1625,7 @@ struct gmap *gmap_shadow(struct gmap *parent, unsigned long asce,
down_read(&parent->mm->mmap_sem);
rc = gmap_protect_range(parent, asce & _ASCE_ORIGIN,
((asce & _ASCE_TABLE_LENGTH) + 1) * PAGE_SIZE,
- PROT_READ, PGSTE_VSIE_BIT);
+ PROT_READ, GMAP_ENTRY_VSIE);
up_read(&parent->mm->mmap_sem);
spin_lock(&parent->shadow_lock);
new->initialized = true;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-06 22:29 [RFC/PATCH 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 01/22] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular Janosch Frank
2017-11-08 10:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-08 12:21 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-08 12:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-06 22:29 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2017-11-10 12:57 ` [RFC/PATCH 02/22] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting David Hildenbrand
2017-11-13 15:57 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-17 9:02 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-17 9:19 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 04/22] s390/mm: Add gmap pmd invalidation and clearing Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 05/22] s390/mm: hugetlb pages within a gmap can not be freed Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 06/22] s390/mm: Introduce gmap_pmdp_xchg Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 07/22] RFC: s390/mm: Transfer guest pmd protection to host Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 08/22] s390/mm: Add huge page dirty sync support Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 09/22] s390/mm: clear huge page storage keys on enable_skey Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 10/22] s390/mm: Add huge pmd storage key handling Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 11/22] s390/mm: Remove superfluous parameter Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 12/22] s390/mm: Add gmap_protect_large read protection support Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 13/22] s390/mm: Make gmap_read_table EDAT1 compatible Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 14/22] s390/mm: Make protect_rmap " Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 15/22] s390/mm: GMAP read table extensions Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 16/22] s390/mm: Add shadow segment code Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 17/22] s390/mm: Add VSIE reverse fake case Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 18/22] s390/mm: Remove gmap_pte_op_walk Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 19/22] s390/mm: Split huge pages if granular protection is needed Janosch Frank
2017-12-07 16:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-08 7:00 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 20/22] s390/mm: Enable gmap huge pmd support Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 10:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-15 12:24 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 21/22] KVM: s390: Add KVM HPAGE capability Janosch Frank
2017-11-07 10:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-07 10:53 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 10:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-15 12:02 ` Janosch Frank
2017-11-06 22:30 ` [RFC/PATCH 22/22] RFC: s390/mm: Add gmap lock classes Janosch Frank
2017-11-15 10:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-15 12:16 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1510007400-42493-3-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dominik.dingel@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox