From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com,
mimu@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] vfio: ap: register IOMMU VFIO notifier
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:46:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1731fb82-7877-9018-d12e-fd0e2406ac19@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553265828-27823-5-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
On 3/22/19 10:43 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> To be able to use the VFIO interface to facilitate the
> mediated device memory pinning/unpinning we need to register
> a notifier for IOMMU.
>
> While we will start to pin one guest page for the interrupt indicator
> byte, this is still ok with ballooning as this page will never be
> used by the guest virtio-balloon driver.
> So the pinned page will never be freed. And even a broken guest does
> so, that would not impact the host as the original page is still
> in control by vfio.
I apologize, but I do not understand what you are saying in the second
sentence of the paragraph above. Why will the pinned page never be
freed? I understand that the pinned page is under the control of vfio
until it is freed, but have no idea what you mean by "and even a broken
guest does so"? A broken guest does what? Can you please reword this so
it makes more sense?
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index bdb36e0..3478499 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -787,6 +787,35 @@ static const struct attribute_group *vfio_ap_mdev_attr_groups[] = {
> NULL
> };
>
> +/**
> + * vfio_ap_mdev_iommu_notifier: IOMMU notifier callback
> + *
> + * @nb: The notifier block
> + * @action: Action to be taken
> + * @data: data associated with the request
> + *
> + * For an UNMAP request, unpin the guest IOVA (the NIB guest address we
> + * pinned before). Other requests are ignored.
> + *
> + */
> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_iommu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> + struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
> +
> + matrix_mdev = container_of(nb, struct ap_matrix_mdev, iommu_notifier);
> +
I don't understand why we registered this notifier. I may be wrong, but
AFAIU, this notifier will be invoked only when the VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA
ioctl is called from userspace. I did an experiment and inserted some
printf's to see if this ever gets called and verified it does not. Maybe
you have a good reason of which I'm not aware. Can you enlighten me
here?
> + if (action == VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DMA_UNMAP) {
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap = data;
> + unsigned long g_pfn = unmap->iova >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(matrix_mdev->mdev), &g_pfn, 1);
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> + }
> +
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_ap_mdev_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> unsigned long action, void *data)
> {
> @@ -897,6 +926,13 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_open(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> goto free_notifier;
> }
>
> + matrix_mdev->iommu_notifier.notifier_call = vfio_ap_mdev_iommu_notifier;
> + events = VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DMA_UNMAP;
> + ret = vfio_register_notifier(mdev_dev(mdev), VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY,
> + &events, &matrix_mdev->iommu_notifier);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_notifier;
> +
> ret = vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(matrix_mdev);
> if (!ret)
> goto unlock;
> @@ -917,6 +953,8 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_release(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>
> mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(matrix_mdev);
> + vfio_unregister_notifier(mdev_dev(mdev), VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY,
> + &matrix_mdev->iommu_notifier);
> vfio_unregister_notifier(mdev_dev(mdev), VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY,
> &matrix_mdev->group_notifier);
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> index 3e6940c..4a287c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> @@ -82,9 +82,11 @@ struct ap_matrix_mdev {
> struct list_head node;
> struct ap_matrix matrix;
> struct notifier_block group_notifier;
> + struct notifier_block iommu_notifier;
> struct kvm *kvm;
> struct kvm_s390_module_hook pqap_hook;
> struct list_head qlist;
> + struct mdev_device *mdev;
> };
>
> extern int vfio_ap_mdev_register(void);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 14:43 [PATCH v6 0/7] vfio: ap: AP Queue Interrupt Control Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] s390: ap: kvm: add PQAP interception for AQIC Pierre Morel
2019-03-26 18:57 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-27 16:06 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 12:43 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 15:24 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 16:12 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-29 8:52 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-29 13:02 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] s390: ap: new vfio_ap_queue structure Pierre Morel
2019-03-25 8:05 ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-03-28 13:12 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-26 20:45 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-27 11:00 ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-03-28 12:53 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 13:06 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 15:32 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 16:06 ` Pierre Morel
2019-04-02 12:47 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] s390: ap: setup relation betwen KVM and mediated device Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 16:12 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 16:27 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 17:25 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-29 8:58 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-29 13:06 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] vfio: ap: register IOMMU VFIO notifier Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 20:46 ` Tony Krowiak [this message]
2019-03-29 9:31 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-29 13:14 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] s390: ap: implement PAPQ AQIC interception in kernel Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] s390: ap: Cleanup on removing the AP device Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] s390: ap: kvm: Enable PQAP/AQIC facility for the guest Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1731fb82-7877-9018-d12e-fd0e2406ac19@linux.ibm.com \
--to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox