From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, mimu@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] s390: ap: new vfio_ap_queue structure
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:53:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d40af924-cd5d-18ae-5fe4-88763e429f7f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf728b35-a610-d343-6ec1-5397025a86cb@linux.ibm.com>
On 27/03/2019 12:00, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> On 26.03.19 21:45, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> On 3/22/19 10:43 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> The AP interruptions are assigned on a queue basis and
...snip...
>>> +static void vfio_ap_free_queue(int apqn, struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
>>> +
>>> + q = vfio_ap_get_queue(apqn, &matrix_mdev->qlist);
>>> + if (!q)
>>> + return;
>>> + q->matrix_mdev = NULL;
>>> + vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q);
>>
>> I'm wondering if it's necessary to reset the queue here. The only time
>> a queue is used is when a guest using the mdev device is started. When
>> that guest is terminated, the fd for the mdev device is closed and the
>> mdev device's release callback is invoked. The release callback resets
>> the queues assigned to the mdev device. Is it really necessary to
>> reset the queue again when it is unassigned even if there would have
>> been no subsequent activity?
> When I understand this here right this code is called when a queue goes
> away from the guest but is still reserved for use by the vfio dd. So it is
> possible to assign the queue now to another guest. But then it makes
> sense to clear all the entries in the millicode queue because a pending
> reply could be "received" by the wrong guest.
>
> If this function is just called on remove of a queue device where the
> device goes back to the AP bus, a reset is not needed.
You are right Harald, the function is called when un-assigning a queue
from a mediated device, so it must be reset before to assign it to another.
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 14:43 [PATCH v6 0/7] vfio: ap: AP Queue Interrupt Control Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] s390: ap: kvm: add PQAP interception for AQIC Pierre Morel
2019-03-26 18:57 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-27 16:06 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 12:43 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 15:24 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 16:12 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-29 8:52 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-29 13:02 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] s390: ap: new vfio_ap_queue structure Pierre Morel
2019-03-25 8:05 ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-03-28 13:12 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-26 20:45 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-27 11:00 ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-03-28 12:53 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2019-03-28 13:06 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 15:32 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 16:06 ` Pierre Morel
2019-04-02 12:47 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] s390: ap: setup relation betwen KVM and mediated device Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 16:12 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 16:27 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 17:25 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-29 8:58 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-29 13:06 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] vfio: ap: register IOMMU VFIO notifier Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 20:46 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-29 9:31 ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-29 13:14 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] s390: ap: implement PAPQ AQIC interception in kernel Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] s390: ap: Cleanup on removing the AP device Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] s390: ap: kvm: Enable PQAP/AQIC facility for the guest Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d40af924-cd5d-18ae-5fe4-88763e429f7f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox