public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/7] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:17:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bf32ccd-4047-7676-2ef4-a3327bf3995f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116120513.2244-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On 16.01.20 13:05, Janosch Frank wrote:
> It's good to know which cpu broke the test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  lib/s390x/interrupt.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> index 05f30be..773752a 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ static void fixup_pgm_int(void)
>  void handle_pgm_int(void)
>  {
>  	if (!pgm_int_expected)
> -		report_abort("Unexpected program interrupt: %d at %#lx, ilen %d\n",
> -			     lc->pgm_int_code, lc->pgm_old_psw.addr,
> +		report_abort("Unexpected program interrupt: %d on cpu %d at %#lx, ilen %d\n",
> +			     lc->pgm_int_code, stap(), lc->pgm_old_psw.addr,
>  			     lc->pgm_int_id);

nit: "cpu: %d"

>  
>  	pgm_int_expected = false;
> @@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ void handle_ext_int(void)
>  {
>  	if (!ext_int_expected &&
>  	    lc->ext_int_code != EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG) {
> -		report_abort("Unexpected external call interrupt (code %#x): at %#lx",
> -			     lc->ext_int_code, lc->ext_old_psw.addr);
> +		report_abort("Unexpected external call interrupt (code %#x): on cpu %d at %#lx",
> +			     stap(), lc->ext_int_code, lc->ext_old_psw.addr);

nit: "(code %#x) on cpu: %d" ...

Same comment for the ones below

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -137,18 +137,18 @@ void handle_ext_int(void)
>  
>  void handle_mcck_int(void)
>  {
> -	report_abort("Unexpected machine check interrupt: at %#lx",
> -		     lc->mcck_old_psw.addr);
> +	report_abort("Unexpected machine check interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
> +		     stap(), lc->mcck_old_psw.addr);
>  }
>  
>  void handle_io_int(void)
>  {
> -	report_abort("Unexpected io interrupt: at %#lx",
> -		     lc->io_old_psw.addr);
> +	report_abort("Unexpected io interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
> +		     stap(), lc->io_old_psw.addr);
>  }
>  
>  void handle_svc_int(void)
>  {
> -	report_abort("Unexpected supervisor call interrupt: at %#lx",
> -		     lc->svc_old_psw.addr);
> +	report_abort("Unexpected supervisor call interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
> +		     stap(), lc->svc_old_psw.addr);
>  }
> 

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-16 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-16 12:05 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/7] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/7] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:13   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/7] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/7] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:17   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-01-16 13:04     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 13:19       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:11     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/7] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 14:14   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:44     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 15:05       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/7] s390x: smp: Wait for cpu setup to finish Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/7] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:24   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:07     ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 13:18       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/7] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
2020-01-17 10:20   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:29     ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-17 10:41       ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1bf32ccd-4047-7676-2ef4-a3327bf3995f@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox