From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/7] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:04:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95c0a6af-7334-1825-226e-5973a639035a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bf32ccd-4047-7676-2ef4-a3327bf3995f@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2475 bytes --]
On 1/16/20 1:17 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.01.20 13:05, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> It's good to know which cpu broke the test.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> lib/s390x/interrupt.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
>> index 05f30be..773752a 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
>> @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ static void fixup_pgm_int(void)
>> void handle_pgm_int(void)
>> {
>> if (!pgm_int_expected)
>> - report_abort("Unexpected program interrupt: %d at %#lx, ilen %d\n",
>> - lc->pgm_int_code, lc->pgm_old_psw.addr,
>> + report_abort("Unexpected program interrupt: %d on cpu %d at %#lx, ilen %d\n",
>> + lc->pgm_int_code, stap(), lc->pgm_old_psw.addr,
>> lc->pgm_int_id);
>
> nit: "cpu: %d"
>
>>
>> pgm_int_expected = false;
>> @@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ void handle_ext_int(void)
>> {
>> if (!ext_int_expected &&
>> lc->ext_int_code != EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG) {
>> - report_abort("Unexpected external call interrupt (code %#x): at %#lx",
>> - lc->ext_int_code, lc->ext_old_psw.addr);
>> + report_abort("Unexpected external call interrupt (code %#x): on cpu %d at %#lx",
>> + stap(), lc->ext_int_code, lc->ext_old_psw.addr);
>
> nit: "(code %#x) on cpu: %d" ...
So, should I move the old : or add a second one?
>
> Same comment for the ones below
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -137,18 +137,18 @@ void handle_ext_int(void)
>>
>> void handle_mcck_int(void)
>> {
>> - report_abort("Unexpected machine check interrupt: at %#lx",
>> - lc->mcck_old_psw.addr);
>> + report_abort("Unexpected machine check interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
>> + stap(), lc->mcck_old_psw.addr);
>> }
>>
>> void handle_io_int(void)
>> {
>> - report_abort("Unexpected io interrupt: at %#lx",
>> - lc->io_old_psw.addr);
>> + report_abort("Unexpected io interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
>> + stap(), lc->io_old_psw.addr);
>> }
>>
>> void handle_svc_int(void)
>> {
>> - report_abort("Unexpected supervisor call interrupt: at %#lx",
>> - lc->svc_old_psw.addr);
>> + report_abort("Unexpected supervisor call interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",
>> + stap(), lc->svc_old_psw.addr);
>> }
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 12:05 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/7] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/7] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/7] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/7] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:04 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-16 13:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:11 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/7] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 14:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:44 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 15:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/7] s390x: smp: Wait for cpu setup to finish Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/7] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:07 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 13:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/7] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
2020-01-17 10:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:29 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-17 10:41 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95c0a6af-7334-1825-226e-5973a639035a@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox