From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: s390: clear_io_irq() requests are not expected for adapter interrupts
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:14:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e96b9b8-7f70-9ef8-2c2b-0b030f348196@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171108120925.3dc136cf.cohuck@redhat.com>
On 08.11.17 12:09, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 12:04:22 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/08/2017 10:19 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:41:43 +0100
>>> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> There is a chance to delete not yet delivered I/O interrupts if an
>>>> exploiter uses the subsystem identification word 0x0000 while
>>>> processing a KVM_DEV_FLIC_CLEAR_IO_IRQ ioctl. -EINVAL will be returned
>>>> now instead in that case.
>>>>
>>>> Classic interrupts will always have bit 0x10000 set in the schid while
>>>> adapter interrupts have a zero schid. The clear_io_irq interface is
>>>> only useful for classic interrupts (as adapter interrupts belong to
>>>> many devices). Let's make this interface more strict and forbid a schid
>>>> of 0.
>>> I'm wondering: Is there any possible use case to clear adapter
>>> interrupts? This interface was introduced to handle the case where a
>>> CRW was made pending for a subchannel (which implies any pending
>>> interrupt needs to be cleared.)
>> The problem with clearing adapter interrupts is that is actually a summary
>> interrupt for every potential device. So I somewhat consider an adapter interrupt
>> pending when the summary indicator went from 0 to 1. So I dont think clearing
>> a single one makes not much sense. (And this interface would be wrong for
>> that I think)
> Yes, this interface would be problematic. I'm not sure what's supposed
> to happen with crws vs. pending adapter interrupts, though.
They will be delivered based on ISC priority and the traditional first
when both have the same class.
>
>> The only use cases I can imagine for clearing adapter interrupts (e.g. reset)
>> is already covered by KVM_DEV_FLIC_CLEAR_IRQS
>>
>>> Alas, I cannot check the adapter interrupt question myself, as the
>>> public doc is lacking :( But qdio as another adapter interrupt user
>>> comes to mind (not that we support it in qemu, but still...)
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt | 3 +++
>>>> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 2 ++
>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt
>>>> index 2f1cbf1..27ad53c 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/s390_flic.txt
>>>> @@ -156,3 +156,6 @@ FLIC with an unknown group or attribute gives the error code EINVAL (instead of
>>>> ENXIO, as specified in the API documentation). It is not possible to conclude
>>>> that a FLIC operation is unavailable based on the error code resulting from a
>>>> usage attempt.
>>>> +
>>>> +Note: The KVM_DEV_FLIC_CLEAR_IO_IRQ ioctl will return EINVAL in case a zero
>>>> +schid is specified.
>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>>>> index a3da4f3..c8aacce 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>>>> @@ -2191,6 +2191,8 @@ static int clear_io_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> if (copy_from_user(&schid, (void __user *) attr->addr, sizeof(schid)))
>>>> return -EFAULT;
>>>> + if (!schid)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> kfree(kvm_s390_get_io_int(kvm, isc_mask, schid));
>>>> /*
>>>> * If userspace is conforming to the architecture, we can have at most
>>>
> As this particular interface would not be a good match for whatever we
> need to do for adapter interrupts, let's go with this patch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-08 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-08 8:41 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: s390: patches for 4.15 Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: s390: document memory ordering for kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 9:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: SIE considerations for AP Queue virtualization Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-09 8:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: s390: vsie: use common code functions for pinning Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: s390: abstract conversion between isc and enum irq_types Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: s390: clear_io_irq() requests are not expected for adapter interrupts Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 11:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 11:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 12:14 ` Michael Mueller [this message]
2017-11-13 12:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 11:10 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: s390: patches for 4.15 Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e96b9b8-7f70-9ef8-2c2b-0b030f348196@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox