From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: SIE considerations for AP Queue virtualization
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 10:29:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9b92e42-35c4-1fff-571c-68397cb0d758@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171108084143.78654-3-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On 08.11.2017 09:41, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> The Crypto Control Block (CRYCB) is referenced by the SIE state
> description and controls KVM guest access to the Adjunct
> Processor (AP) adapters, usage domains and control domains.
> This patch defines the AP control blocks to be used for
> controlling guest access to the AP adapters and domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Message-Id: <1507916344-3896-2-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index fd006a2..646e1fe 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -685,11 +685,28 @@ struct kvm_s390_crypto {
> __u8 dea_kw;
> };
>
> +#define APCB0_MASK_SIZE 1
> +struct kvm_s390_apcb0 {
> + __u64 apm[APCB0_MASK_SIZE]; /* 0x0000 */
> + __u64 aqm[APCB0_MASK_SIZE]; /* 0x0008 */
> + __u64 adm[APCB0_MASK_SIZE]; /* 0x0010 */
Do these really have to be arrays? Also, size usually specifies bytes
and not double words (applies also to the one definition below).
> + __u64 reserved18; /* 0x0018 */
> +};
> +
> +#define APCB1_MASK_SIZE 4
> +struct kvm_s390_apcb1 {
> + __u64 apm[APCB1_MASK_SIZE]; /* 0x0000 */
> + __u64 aqm[APCB1_MASK_SIZE]; /* 0x0020 */
> + __u64 adm[APCB1_MASK_SIZE]; /* 0x0040 */
> + __u64 reserved60[4]; /* 0x0060 */
> +};
> +
> struct kvm_s390_crypto_cb {
> - __u8 reserved00[72]; /* 0x0000 */
> - __u8 dea_wrapping_key_mask[24]; /* 0x0048 */
> - __u8 aes_wrapping_key_mask[32]; /* 0x0060 */
> - __u8 reserved80[128]; /* 0x0080 */
> + struct kvm_s390_apcb0 apcb0; /* 0x0000 */
> + __u8 reserved20[40]; /* 0x0020 */
Not sure if should turn this into [0x0048 - 0x0020], just like we do for
e.g. lowcore. But maybe the specification explicitly states "40 bytes
reserved". The 40 makes sense.
> + __u8 dea_wrapping_key_mask[24]; /* 0x0048 */
> + __u8 aes_wrapping_key_mask[32]; /* 0x0060 */
> + struct kvm_s390_apcb1 apcb1; /* 0x0080 */
> };
While touching all lines, can we get rid of the strange indentation
after __u8?
Unfortunately I don't have access to any specification, so I can't
double check.
>
> /*
>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-08 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-08 8:41 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: s390: patches for 4.15 Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: s390: document memory ordering for kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 9:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: SIE considerations for AP Queue virtualization Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2017-11-09 8:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: s390: vsie: use common code functions for pinning Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: s390: abstract conversion between isc and enum irq_types Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-08 8:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: s390: clear_io_irq() requests are not expected for adapter interrupts Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 9:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 11:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 11:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 12:14 ` Michael Mueller
2017-11-13 12:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-08 11:10 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: s390: patches for 4.15 Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9b92e42-35c4-1fff-571c-68397cb0d758@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox