* [GIT PULL 01/11] KVM: s390: Spelling s/intance/instance/
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:43 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 02/11] KVM: s390: cleanup jump lables in kvm_arch_init_vm Christian Borntraeger
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Geert Uytterhoeven,
Christian Borntraeger
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Message-Id: <1425932832-6244-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index fda3f31..83f32a1 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void kvm_s390_set_psw_cc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cc)
vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask |= cc << 44;
}
-/* test availability of facility in a kvm intance */
+/* test availability of facility in a kvm instance */
static inline int test_kvm_facility(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long nr)
{
return __test_facility(nr, kvm->arch.model.fac->mask) &&
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 02/11] KVM: s390: cleanup jump lables in kvm_arch_init_vm
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:43 ` [GIT PULL 01/11] KVM: s390: Spelling s/intance/instance/ Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 03/11] KVM: s390: Fix low-address protection for real addresses Christian Borntraeger
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Dominik Dingel, Christian Borntraeger
From: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
As all cleanup functions can handle their respective NULL case
there is no need to have more than one error jump label.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 14 +++++---------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 02e03c8..4075acb 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
kvm->arch.dbf = debug_register(debug_name, 8, 2, 8 * sizeof(long));
if (!kvm->arch.dbf)
- goto out_nodbf;
+ goto out_err;
/*
* The architectural maximum amount of facilities is 16 kbit. To store
@@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
kvm->arch.model.fac =
(struct kvm_s390_fac *) get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
if (!kvm->arch.model.fac)
- goto out_nofac;
+ goto out_err;
/* Populate the facility mask initially. */
memcpy(kvm->arch.model.fac->mask, S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list,
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
kvm->arch.model.ibc = sclp_get_ibc() & 0x0fff;
if (kvm_s390_crypto_init(kvm) < 0)
- goto out_crypto;
+ goto out_err;
spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.float_int.lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.float_int.list);
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
} else {
kvm->arch.gmap = gmap_alloc(current->mm, (1UL << 44) - 1);
if (!kvm->arch.gmap)
- goto out_nogmap;
+ goto out_err;
kvm->arch.gmap->private = kvm;
kvm->arch.gmap->pfault_enabled = 0;
}
@@ -957,15 +957,11 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
return 0;
-out_nogmap:
+out_err:
kfree(kvm->arch.crypto.crycb);
-out_crypto:
free_page((unsigned long)kvm->arch.model.fac);
-out_nofac:
debug_unregister(kvm->arch.dbf);
-out_nodbf:
free_page((unsigned long)(kvm->arch.sca));
-out_err:
return rc;
}
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 03/11] KVM: s390: Fix low-address protection for real addresses
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:43 ` [GIT PULL 01/11] KVM: s390: Spelling s/intance/instance/ Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 02/11] KVM: s390: cleanup jump lables in kvm_arch_init_vm Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 04/11] KVM: s390: Guest's memory access functions get access registers Christian Borntraeger
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Alexander Yarygin, Thomas Huth,
Christian Borntraeger
From: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The kvm_s390_check_low_addr_protection() function is used only with real
addresses. According to the POP (the "Low-Address Protection"
paragraph in chapter 3), if the effective address is real or absolute,
the low-address protection procedure should raise a PROTECTION exception
only when the low-address protection is enabled in the control register
0 and the address is low.
This patch removes ASCE checks from the function and renames it to
better reflect its behavior.
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 11 ++++++-----
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 2 +-
arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index 633fe9b..c230904 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -697,28 +697,29 @@ int guest_translate_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva,
}
/**
- * kvm_s390_check_low_addr_protection - check for low-address protection
- * @ga: Guest address
+ * kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real - check for low-address protection
+ * @gra: Guest real address
*
* Checks whether an address is subject to low-address protection and set
* up vcpu->arch.pgm accordingly if necessary.
*
* Return: 0 if no protection exception, or PGM_PROTECTION if protected.
*/
-int kvm_s390_check_low_addr_protection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga)
+int kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra)
{
struct kvm_s390_pgm_info *pgm = &vcpu->arch.pgm;
psw_t *psw = &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw;
struct trans_exc_code_bits *tec_bits;
+ union ctlreg0 ctlreg0 = {.val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0]};
- if (!is_low_address(ga) || !low_address_protection_enabled(vcpu))
+ if (!ctlreg0.lap || !is_low_address(gra))
return 0;
memset(pgm, 0, sizeof(*pgm));
tec_bits = (struct trans_exc_code_bits *)&pgm->trans_exc_code;
tec_bits->fsi = FSI_STORE;
tec_bits->as = psw_bits(*psw).as;
- tec_bits->addr = ga >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ tec_bits->addr = gra >> PAGE_SHIFT;
pgm->code = PGM_PROTECTION;
return pgm->code;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index 0149cf1..20de77e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -330,6 +330,6 @@ int read_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
void ipte_lock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void ipte_unlock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int ipte_lock_held(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-int kvm_s390_check_low_addr_protection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga);
+int kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra);
#endif /* __KVM_S390_GACCESS_H */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index b982fbc..5f26425 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int handle_test_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_s390_get_regs_rre(vcpu, NULL, ®2);
addr = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg2] & PAGE_MASK;
addr = kvm_s390_logical_to_effective(vcpu, addr);
- if (kvm_s390_check_low_addr_protection(vcpu, addr))
+ if (kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real(vcpu, addr))
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_irq(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.pgm);
addr = kvm_s390_real_to_abs(vcpu, addr);
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static int handle_pfmf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_CF) {
- if (kvm_s390_check_low_addr_protection(vcpu, start))
+ if (kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real(vcpu, start))
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_irq(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.pgm);
}
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 04/11] KVM: s390: Guest's memory access functions get access registers
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 03/11] KVM: s390: Fix low-address protection for real addresses Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 05/11] KVM: s390: Optimize paths where get_vcpu_asce() is invoked Christian Borntraeger
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Alexander Yarygin,
Christian Borntraeger
From: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In access register mode, the write_guest() read_guest() and other
functions will invoke the access register translation, which
requires an ar, designated by one of the instruction fields.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/diag.c | 4 +--
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 4 +--
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 14 +++++----
arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 4 +--
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 +-
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 25 +++++++++++++---
arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c | 4 +--
8 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
index 9254aff..89140dd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int __diag_page_ref_service(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[rx] & 7)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
- rc = read_guest(vcpu, vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[rx], &parm, sizeof(parm));
+ rc = read_guest(vcpu, vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[rx], rx, &parm, sizeof(parm));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
if (parm.parm_version != 2 || parm.parm_len < 5 || parm.code != 0x258)
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int __diag_virtio_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int kvm_s390_handle_diag(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int code = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu) & 0xffff;
+ int code = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu, NULL) & 0xffff;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index c230904..494131e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int guest_page_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga,
return 0;
}
-int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, void *data,
+int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, ar_t ar, void *data,
unsigned long len, int write)
{
psw_t *psw = &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw;
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
* Note: The IPTE lock is not taken during this function, so the caller
* has to take care of this.
*/
-int guest_translate_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva,
+int guest_translate_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva, ar_t ar,
unsigned long *gpa, int write)
{
struct kvm_s390_pgm_info *pgm = &vcpu->arch.pgm;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index 20de77e..7c2866b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ int read_guest_lc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
}
int guest_translate_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva,
- unsigned long *gpa, int write);
+ ar_t ar, unsigned long *gpa, int write);
-int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, void *data,
+int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, ar_t ar, void *data,
unsigned long len, int write);
int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
* write_guest - copy data from kernel space to guest space
* @vcpu: virtual cpu
* @ga: guest address
+ * @ar: access register
* @data: source address in kernel space
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
@@ -210,16 +211,17 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
* if data has been changed in guest space in case of an exception.
*/
static inline __must_check
-int write_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, void *data,
+int write_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, ar_t ar, void *data,
unsigned long len)
{
- return access_guest(vcpu, ga, data, len, 1);
+ return access_guest(vcpu, ga, ar, data, len, 1);
}
/**
* read_guest - copy data from guest space to kernel space
* @vcpu: virtual cpu
* @ga: guest address
+ * @ar: access register
* @data: destination address in kernel space
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
@@ -229,10 +231,10 @@ int write_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, void *data,
* data will be copied from guest space to kernel space.
*/
static inline __must_check
-int read_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, void *data,
+int read_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, ar_t ar, void *data,
unsigned long len)
{
- return access_guest(vcpu, ga, data, len, 0);
+ return access_guest(vcpu, ga, ar, data, len, 0);
}
/**
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index 08ae10a..9e3779e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int handle_mvpg_pei(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* Make sure that the source is paged-in */
rc = guest_translate_address(vcpu, vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg2],
- &srcaddr, 0);
+ reg2, &srcaddr, 0);
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
rc = kvm_arch_fault_in_page(vcpu, srcaddr, 0);
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int handle_mvpg_pei(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* Make sure that the destination is paged-in */
rc = guest_translate_address(vcpu, vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1],
- &dstaddr, 1);
+ reg1, &dstaddr, 1);
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
rc = kvm_arch_fault_in_page(vcpu, dstaddr, 1);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 4075acb..610e90a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -1776,7 +1776,7 @@ static int vcpu_post_run_fault_in_sie(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* to look up the current opcode to get the length of the instruction
* to be able to forward the PSW.
*/
- rc = read_guest(vcpu, psw->addr, &opcode, 1);
+ rc = read_guest(vcpu, psw->addr, 0, &opcode, 1);
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
psw->addr = __rewind_psw(*psw, -insn_length(opcode));
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index 83f32a1..5d54191 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -70,16 +70,22 @@ static inline void kvm_s390_set_prefix(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 prefix)
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD, vcpu);
}
-static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+typedef u8 __bitwise ar_t;
+
+static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ar_t *ar)
{
u32 base2 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
u32 disp2 = ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16);
+ if (ar)
+ *ar = base2;
+
return (base2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2] : 0) + disp2;
}
static inline void kvm_s390_get_base_disp_sse(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- u64 *address1, u64 *address2)
+ u64 *address1, u64 *address2,
+ ar_t *ar_b1, ar_t *ar_b2)
{
u32 base1 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0xf0000000) >> 28;
u32 disp1 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16;
@@ -88,6 +94,11 @@ static inline void kvm_s390_get_base_disp_sse(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
*address1 = (base1 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base1] : 0) + disp1;
*address2 = (base2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2] : 0) + disp2;
+
+ if (ar_b1)
+ *ar_b1 = base1;
+ if (ar_b2)
+ *ar_b2 = base2;
}
static inline void kvm_s390_get_regs_rre(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int *r1, int *r2)
@@ -98,7 +109,7 @@ static inline void kvm_s390_get_regs_rre(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int *r1, int *r2
*r2 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x000f0000) >> 16;
}
-static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rsy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rsy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ar_t *ar)
{
u32 base2 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
u32 disp2 = ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16) +
@@ -107,14 +118,20 @@ static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rsy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (disp2 & 0x80000)
disp2+=0xfff00000;
+ if (ar)
+ *ar = base2;
+
return (base2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2] : 0) + (long)(int)disp2;
}
-static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ar_t *ar)
{
u32 base2 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
u32 disp2 = ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16);
+ if (ar)
+ *ar = base2;
+
return (base2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2] : 0) + disp2;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index 5f26425..f4fe02e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -36,15 +36,16 @@ static int handle_set_clock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm_vcpu *cpup;
s64 hostclk, val;
int i, rc;
+ ar_t ar;
u64 op2;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- op2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu);
+ op2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
if (op2 & 7) /* Operand must be on a doubleword boundary */
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
- rc = read_guest(vcpu, op2, &val, sizeof(val));
+ rc = read_guest(vcpu, op2, ar, &val, sizeof(val));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
@@ -68,20 +69,21 @@ static int handle_set_prefix(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u64 operand2;
u32 address;
int rc;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_spx++;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu);
+ operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
/* must be word boundary */
if (operand2 & 3)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
/* get the value */
- rc = read_guest(vcpu, operand2, &address, sizeof(address));
+ rc = read_guest(vcpu, operand2, ar, &address, sizeof(address));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
@@ -107,13 +109,14 @@ static int handle_store_prefix(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u64 operand2;
u32 address;
int rc;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_stpx++;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu);
+ operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
/* must be word boundary */
if (operand2 & 3)
@@ -122,7 +125,7 @@ static int handle_store_prefix(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
address = kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu);
/* get the value */
- rc = write_guest(vcpu, operand2, &address, sizeof(address));
+ rc = write_guest(vcpu, operand2, ar, &address, sizeof(address));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
@@ -136,18 +139,19 @@ static int handle_store_cpu_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u16 vcpu_id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
u64 ga;
int rc;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_stap++;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu);
+ ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
if (ga & 1)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
- rc = write_guest(vcpu, ga, &vcpu_id, sizeof(vcpu_id));
+ rc = write_guest(vcpu, ga, ar, &vcpu_id, sizeof(vcpu_id));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
@@ -231,8 +235,9 @@ static int handle_tpi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u32 tpi_data[3];
int rc;
u64 addr;
+ ar_t ar;
- addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu);
+ addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
if (addr & 3)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
@@ -251,7 +256,7 @@ static int handle_tpi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* provided area.
*/
len = sizeof(tpi_data) - 4;
- rc = write_guest(vcpu, addr, &tpi_data, len);
+ rc = write_guest(vcpu, addr, ar, &tpi_data, len);
if (rc) {
rc = kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
goto reinject_interrupt;
@@ -395,15 +400,16 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_lpsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
psw_compat_t new_psw;
u64 addr;
int rc;
+ ar_t ar;
if (gpsw->mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu);
+ addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
if (addr & 7)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
- rc = read_guest(vcpu, addr, &new_psw, sizeof(new_psw));
+ rc = read_guest(vcpu, addr, ar, &new_psw, sizeof(new_psw));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
if (!(new_psw.mask & PSW32_MASK_BASE))
@@ -421,14 +427,15 @@ static int handle_lpswe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
psw_t new_psw;
u64 addr;
int rc;
+ ar_t ar;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu);
+ addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
if (addr & 7)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
- rc = read_guest(vcpu, addr, &new_psw, sizeof(new_psw));
+ rc = read_guest(vcpu, addr, ar, &new_psw, sizeof(new_psw));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw = new_psw;
@@ -442,18 +449,19 @@ static int handle_stidp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u64 stidp_data = vcpu->arch.stidp_data;
u64 operand2;
int rc;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_stidp++;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu);
+ operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
if (operand2 & 7)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
- rc = write_guest(vcpu, operand2, &stidp_data, sizeof(stidp_data));
+ rc = write_guest(vcpu, operand2, ar, &stidp_data, sizeof(stidp_data));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
@@ -496,6 +504,7 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
unsigned long mem = 0;
u64 operand2;
int rc = 0;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_stsi++;
VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 4, "stsi: fc: %x sel1: %x sel2: %x", fc, sel1, sel2);
@@ -518,7 +527,7 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return 0;
}
- operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu);
+ operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
if (operand2 & 0xfff)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
@@ -542,7 +551,7 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
break;
}
- rc = write_guest(vcpu, operand2, (void *)mem, PAGE_SIZE);
+ rc = write_guest(vcpu, operand2, ar, (void *)mem, PAGE_SIZE);
if (rc) {
rc = kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
goto out;
@@ -786,13 +795,14 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_lctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int reg, rc, nr_regs;
u32 ctl_array[16];
u64 ga;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_lctl++;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu);
+ ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu, &ar);
if (ga & 3)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
@@ -801,7 +811,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_lctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
trace_kvm_s390_handle_lctl(vcpu, 0, reg1, reg3, ga);
nr_regs = ((reg3 - reg1) & 0xf) + 1;
- rc = read_guest(vcpu, ga, ctl_array, nr_regs * sizeof(u32));
+ rc = read_guest(vcpu, ga, ar, ctl_array, nr_regs * sizeof(u32));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
reg = reg1;
@@ -824,13 +834,14 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_stctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int reg, rc, nr_regs;
u32 ctl_array[16];
u64 ga;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_stctl++;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu);
+ ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu, &ar);
if (ga & 3)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
@@ -846,7 +857,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_stctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
break;
reg = (reg + 1) % 16;
} while (1);
- rc = write_guest(vcpu, ga, ctl_array, nr_regs * sizeof(u32));
+ rc = write_guest(vcpu, ga, ar, ctl_array, nr_regs * sizeof(u32));
return rc ? kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc) : 0;
}
@@ -857,13 +868,14 @@ static int handle_lctlg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int reg, rc, nr_regs;
u64 ctl_array[16];
u64 ga;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_lctlg++;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rsy(vcpu);
+ ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rsy(vcpu, &ar);
if (ga & 7)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
@@ -872,7 +884,7 @@ static int handle_lctlg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
trace_kvm_s390_handle_lctl(vcpu, 1, reg1, reg3, ga);
nr_regs = ((reg3 - reg1) & 0xf) + 1;
- rc = read_guest(vcpu, ga, ctl_array, nr_regs * sizeof(u64));
+ rc = read_guest(vcpu, ga, ar, ctl_array, nr_regs * sizeof(u64));
if (rc)
return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
reg = reg1;
@@ -894,13 +906,14 @@ static int handle_stctg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int reg, rc, nr_regs;
u64 ctl_array[16];
u64 ga;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_stctg++;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rsy(vcpu);
+ ga = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rsy(vcpu, &ar);
if (ga & 7)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
@@ -916,7 +929,7 @@ static int handle_stctg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
break;
reg = (reg + 1) % 16;
} while (1);
- rc = write_guest(vcpu, ga, ctl_array, nr_regs * sizeof(u64));
+ rc = write_guest(vcpu, ga, ar, ctl_array, nr_regs * sizeof(u64));
return rc ? kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc) : 0;
}
@@ -941,13 +954,14 @@ static int handle_tprot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
unsigned long hva, gpa;
int ret = 0, cc = 0;
bool writable;
+ ar_t ar;
vcpu->stat.instruction_tprot++;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- kvm_s390_get_base_disp_sse(vcpu, &address1, &address2);
+ kvm_s390_get_base_disp_sse(vcpu, &address1, &address2, &ar, NULL);
/* we only handle the Linux memory detection case:
* access key == 0
@@ -956,11 +970,11 @@ static int handle_tprot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_DAT)
ipte_lock(vcpu);
- ret = guest_translate_address(vcpu, address1, &gpa, 1);
+ ret = guest_translate_address(vcpu, address1, ar, &gpa, 1);
if (ret == PGM_PROTECTION) {
/* Write protected? Try again with read-only... */
cc = 1;
- ret = guest_translate_address(vcpu, address1, &gpa, 0);
+ ret = guest_translate_address(vcpu, address1, ar, &gpa, 0);
}
if (ret) {
if (ret == PGM_ADDRESSING || ret == PGM_TRANSLATION_SPEC) {
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c b/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
index 755a733..72e58bd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_sigp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
- order_code = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu);
+ order_code = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu, NULL);
if (handle_sigp_order_in_user_space(vcpu, order_code))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_sigp_pei(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int r3 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x000f;
u16 cpu_addr = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[r3];
struct kvm_vcpu *dest_vcpu;
- u8 order_code = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu);
+ u8 order_code = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rs(vcpu, NULL);
trace_kvm_s390_handle_sigp_pei(vcpu, order_code, cpu_addr);
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 05/11] KVM: s390: Optimize paths where get_vcpu_asce() is invoked
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 04/11] KVM: s390: Guest's memory access functions get access registers Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 06/11] KVM: s390: Add access register mode Christian Borntraeger
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Alexander Yarygin,
Christian Borntraeger
From: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
During dynamic address translation the get_vcpu_asce()
function can be invoked several times. It's ok for usual modes, but will
be slow if CPUs are in AR mode. Let's call the get_vcpu_asce() once and
pass the result to the called functions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index 494131e..c74462a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ static int deref_table(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long gpa, unsigned long *val)
* @vcpu: virtual cpu
* @gva: guest virtual address
* @gpa: points to where guest physical (absolute) address should be stored
+ * @asce: effective asce
* @write: indicates if access is a write access
*
* Translate a guest virtual address into a guest absolute address by means
@@ -345,7 +346,8 @@ static int deref_table(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long gpa, unsigned long *val)
* by the architecture
*/
static unsigned long guest_translate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva,
- unsigned long *gpa, int write)
+ unsigned long *gpa, const union asce asce,
+ int write)
{
union vaddress vaddr = {.addr = gva};
union raddress raddr = {.addr = gva};
@@ -354,12 +356,10 @@ static unsigned long guest_translate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva,
union ctlreg0 ctlreg0;
unsigned long ptr;
int edat1, edat2;
- union asce asce;
ctlreg0.val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0];
edat1 = ctlreg0.edat && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8);
edat2 = edat1 && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 78);
- asce.val = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu);
if (asce.r)
goto real_address;
ptr = asce.origin * 4096;
@@ -506,15 +506,14 @@ static inline int is_low_address(unsigned long ga)
return (ga & ~0x11fful) == 0;
}
-static int low_address_protection_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static int low_address_protection_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const union asce asce)
{
union ctlreg0 ctlreg0 = {.val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0]};
psw_t *psw = &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw;
- union asce asce;
if (!ctlreg0.lap)
return 0;
- asce.val = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu);
if (psw_bits(*psw).t && asce.p)
return 0;
return 1;
@@ -536,7 +535,7 @@ enum {
static int guest_page_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga,
unsigned long *pages, unsigned long nr_pages,
- int write)
+ const union asce asce, int write)
{
struct kvm_s390_pgm_info *pgm = &vcpu->arch.pgm;
psw_t *psw = &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw;
@@ -547,7 +546,7 @@ static int guest_page_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga,
tec_bits = (struct trans_exc_code_bits *)&pgm->trans_exc_code;
tec_bits->fsi = write ? FSI_STORE : FSI_FETCH;
tec_bits->as = psw_bits(*psw).as;
- lap_enabled = low_address_protection_enabled(vcpu);
+ lap_enabled = low_address_protection_enabled(vcpu, asce);
while (nr_pages) {
ga = kvm_s390_logical_to_effective(vcpu, ga);
tec_bits->addr = ga >> PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -557,7 +556,7 @@ static int guest_page_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga,
}
ga &= PAGE_MASK;
if (psw_bits(*psw).t) {
- rc = guest_translate(vcpu, ga, pages, write);
+ rc = guest_translate(vcpu, ga, pages, asce, write);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
if (rc == PGM_PROTECTION)
@@ -604,7 +603,7 @@ int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, ar_t ar, void *data,
need_ipte_lock = psw_bits(*psw).t && !asce.r;
if (need_ipte_lock)
ipte_lock(vcpu);
- rc = guest_page_range(vcpu, ga, pages, nr_pages, write);
+ rc = guest_page_range(vcpu, ga, pages, nr_pages, asce, write);
for (idx = 0; idx < nr_pages && !rc; idx++) {
gpa = *(pages + idx) + (ga & ~PAGE_MASK);
_len = min(PAGE_SIZE - (gpa & ~PAGE_MASK), len);
@@ -671,16 +670,16 @@ int guest_translate_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva, ar_t ar,
tec->as = psw_bits(*psw).as;
tec->fsi = write ? FSI_STORE : FSI_FETCH;
tec->addr = gva >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (is_low_address(gva) && low_address_protection_enabled(vcpu)) {
+ asce.val = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu);
+ if (is_low_address(gva) && low_address_protection_enabled(vcpu, asce)) {
if (write) {
rc = pgm->code = PGM_PROTECTION;
return rc;
}
}
- asce.val = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu);
if (psw_bits(*psw).t && !asce.r) { /* Use DAT? */
- rc = guest_translate(vcpu, gva, gpa, write);
+ rc = guest_translate(vcpu, gva, gpa, asce, write);
if (rc > 0) {
if (rc == PGM_PROTECTION)
tec->b61 = 1;
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 06/11] KVM: s390: Add access register mode
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 05/11] KVM: s390: Optimize paths where get_vcpu_asce() is invoked Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 07/11] KVM: s390: Add MEMOP ioctls for reading/writing guest memory Christian Borntraeger
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Alexander Yarygin,
Christian Borntraeger
From: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Access register mode is one of the modes that control dynamic address
translation. In this mode the address space is specified by values of
the access registers. The effective address-space-control element is
obtained from the result of the access register translation. See
the "Access-Register Introduction" section of the chapter 5 "Program
Execution" in "Principles of Operations" for more details.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 3 +-
2 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index c74462a..ea38d71 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
#include "kvm-s390.h"
#include "gaccess.h"
+#include <asm/switch_to.h>
union asce {
unsigned long val;
@@ -207,6 +208,54 @@ union raddress {
unsigned long pfra : 52; /* Page-Frame Real Address */
};
+union alet {
+ u32 val;
+ struct {
+ u32 reserved : 7;
+ u32 p : 1;
+ u32 alesn : 8;
+ u32 alen : 16;
+ };
+};
+
+union ald {
+ u32 val;
+ struct {
+ u32 : 1;
+ u32 alo : 24;
+ u32 all : 7;
+ };
+};
+
+struct ale {
+ unsigned long i : 1; /* ALEN-Invalid Bit */
+ unsigned long : 5;
+ unsigned long fo : 1; /* Fetch-Only Bit */
+ unsigned long p : 1; /* Private Bit */
+ unsigned long alesn : 8; /* Access-List-Entry Sequence Number */
+ unsigned long aleax : 16; /* Access-List-Entry Authorization Index */
+ unsigned long : 32;
+ unsigned long : 1;
+ unsigned long asteo : 25; /* ASN-Second-Table-Entry Origin */
+ unsigned long : 6;
+ unsigned long astesn : 32; /* ASTE Sequence Number */
+} __packed;
+
+struct aste {
+ unsigned long i : 1; /* ASX-Invalid Bit */
+ unsigned long ato : 29; /* Authority-Table Origin */
+ unsigned long : 1;
+ unsigned long b : 1; /* Base-Space Bit */
+ unsigned long ax : 16; /* Authorization Index */
+ unsigned long atl : 12; /* Authority-Table Length */
+ unsigned long : 2;
+ unsigned long ca : 1; /* Controlled-ASN Bit */
+ unsigned long ra : 1; /* Reusable-ASN Bit */
+ unsigned long asce : 64; /* Address-Space-Control Element */
+ unsigned long ald : 32;
+ unsigned long astesn : 32;
+ /* .. more fields there */
+} __packed;
int ipte_lock_held(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
@@ -307,15 +356,157 @@ void ipte_unlock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
ipte_unlock_simple(vcpu);
}
-static unsigned long get_vcpu_asce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static int ar_translation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, union asce *asce, ar_t ar,
+ int write)
+{
+ union alet alet;
+ struct ale ale;
+ struct aste aste;
+ unsigned long ald_addr, authority_table_addr;
+ union ald ald;
+ int eax, rc;
+ u8 authority_table;
+
+ if (ar >= NUM_ACRS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ save_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
+ alet.val = vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs[ar];
+
+ if (ar == 0 || alet.val == 0) {
+ asce->val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[1];
+ return 0;
+ } else if (alet.val == 1) {
+ asce->val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[7];
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (alet.reserved)
+ return PGM_ALET_SPECIFICATION;
+
+ if (alet.p)
+ ald_addr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[5];
+ else
+ ald_addr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[2];
+ ald_addr &= 0x7fffffc0;
+
+ rc = read_guest_real(vcpu, ald_addr + 16, &ald.val, sizeof(union ald));
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (alet.alen / 8 > ald.all)
+ return PGM_ALEN_TRANSLATION;
+
+ if (0x7fffffff - ald.alo * 128 < alet.alen * 16)
+ return PGM_ADDRESSING;
+
+ rc = read_guest_real(vcpu, ald.alo * 128 + alet.alen * 16, &ale,
+ sizeof(struct ale));
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (ale.i == 1)
+ return PGM_ALEN_TRANSLATION;
+ if (ale.alesn != alet.alesn)
+ return PGM_ALE_SEQUENCE;
+
+ rc = read_guest_real(vcpu, ale.asteo * 64, &aste, sizeof(struct aste));
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (aste.i)
+ return PGM_ASTE_VALIDITY;
+ if (aste.astesn != ale.astesn)
+ return PGM_ASTE_SEQUENCE;
+
+ if (ale.p == 1) {
+ eax = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[8] >> 16) & 0xffff;
+ if (ale.aleax != eax) {
+ if (eax / 16 > aste.atl)
+ return PGM_EXTENDED_AUTHORITY;
+
+ authority_table_addr = aste.ato * 4 + eax / 4;
+
+ rc = read_guest_real(vcpu, authority_table_addr,
+ &authority_table,
+ sizeof(u8));
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ if ((authority_table & (0x40 >> ((eax & 3) * 2))) == 0)
+ return PGM_EXTENDED_AUTHORITY;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (ale.fo == 1 && write)
+ return PGM_PROTECTION;
+
+ asce->val = aste.asce;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct trans_exc_code_bits {
+ unsigned long addr : 52; /* Translation-exception Address */
+ unsigned long fsi : 2; /* Access Exception Fetch/Store Indication */
+ unsigned long : 6;
+ unsigned long b60 : 1;
+ unsigned long b61 : 1;
+ unsigned long as : 2; /* ASCE Identifier */
+};
+
+enum {
+ FSI_UNKNOWN = 0, /* Unknown wether fetch or store */
+ FSI_STORE = 1, /* Exception was due to store operation */
+ FSI_FETCH = 2 /* Exception was due to fetch operation */
+};
+
+static int get_vcpu_asce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, union asce *asce,
+ ar_t ar, int write)
{
+ int rc;
+ psw_t *psw = &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw;
+ struct kvm_s390_pgm_info *pgm = &vcpu->arch.pgm;
+ struct trans_exc_code_bits *tec_bits;
+
+ memset(pgm, 0, sizeof(*pgm));
+ tec_bits = (struct trans_exc_code_bits *)&pgm->trans_exc_code;
+ tec_bits->fsi = write ? FSI_STORE : FSI_FETCH;
+ tec_bits->as = psw_bits(*psw).as;
+
+ if (!psw_bits(*psw).t) {
+ asce->val = 0;
+ asce->r = 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
switch (psw_bits(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw).as) {
case PSW_AS_PRIMARY:
- return vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[1];
+ asce->val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[1];
+ return 0;
case PSW_AS_SECONDARY:
- return vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[7];
+ asce->val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[7];
+ return 0;
case PSW_AS_HOME:
- return vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[13];
+ asce->val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[13];
+ return 0;
+ case PSW_AS_ACCREG:
+ rc = ar_translation(vcpu, asce, ar, write);
+ switch (rc) {
+ case PGM_ALEN_TRANSLATION:
+ case PGM_ALE_SEQUENCE:
+ case PGM_ASTE_VALIDITY:
+ case PGM_ASTE_SEQUENCE:
+ case PGM_EXTENDED_AUTHORITY:
+ vcpu->arch.pgm.exc_access_id = ar;
+ break;
+ case PGM_PROTECTION:
+ tec_bits->b60 = 1;
+ tec_bits->b61 = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (rc > 0)
+ pgm->code = rc;
+ return rc;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -519,20 +710,6 @@ static int low_address_protection_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return 1;
}
-struct trans_exc_code_bits {
- unsigned long addr : 52; /* Translation-exception Address */
- unsigned long fsi : 2; /* Access Exception Fetch/Store Indication */
- unsigned long : 7;
- unsigned long b61 : 1;
- unsigned long as : 2; /* ASCE Identifier */
-};
-
-enum {
- FSI_UNKNOWN = 0, /* Unknown wether fetch or store */
- FSI_STORE = 1, /* Exception was due to store operation */
- FSI_FETCH = 2 /* Exception was due to fetch operation */
-};
-
static int guest_page_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga,
unsigned long *pages, unsigned long nr_pages,
const union asce asce, int write)
@@ -542,10 +719,7 @@ static int guest_page_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga,
struct trans_exc_code_bits *tec_bits;
int lap_enabled, rc;
- memset(pgm, 0, sizeof(*pgm));
tec_bits = (struct trans_exc_code_bits *)&pgm->trans_exc_code;
- tec_bits->fsi = write ? FSI_STORE : FSI_FETCH;
- tec_bits->as = psw_bits(*psw).as;
lap_enabled = low_address_protection_enabled(vcpu, asce);
while (nr_pages) {
ga = kvm_s390_logical_to_effective(vcpu, ga);
@@ -590,16 +764,15 @@ int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, ar_t ar, void *data,
if (!len)
return 0;
- /* Access register mode is not supported yet. */
- if (psw_bits(*psw).t && psw_bits(*psw).as == PSW_AS_ACCREG)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ rc = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu, &asce, ar, write);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
nr_pages = (((ga & ~PAGE_MASK) + len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1;
pages = pages_array;
if (nr_pages > ARRAY_SIZE(pages_array))
pages = vmalloc(nr_pages * sizeof(unsigned long));
if (!pages)
return -ENOMEM;
- asce.val = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu);
need_ipte_lock = psw_bits(*psw).t && !asce.r;
if (need_ipte_lock)
ipte_lock(vcpu);
@@ -660,17 +833,12 @@ int guest_translate_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva, ar_t ar,
union asce asce;
int rc;
- /* Access register mode is not supported yet. */
- if (psw_bits(*psw).t && psw_bits(*psw).as == PSW_AS_ACCREG)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
gva = kvm_s390_logical_to_effective(vcpu, gva);
- memset(pgm, 0, sizeof(*pgm));
tec = (struct trans_exc_code_bits *)&pgm->trans_exc_code;
- tec->as = psw_bits(*psw).as;
- tec->fsi = write ? FSI_STORE : FSI_FETCH;
+ rc = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu, &asce, ar, write);
tec->addr = gva >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- asce.val = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
if (is_low_address(gva) && low_address_protection_enabled(vcpu, asce)) {
if (write) {
rc = pgm->code = PGM_PROTECTION;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index 7c2866b..835e557 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -177,8 +177,7 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
* If DAT is off data will be copied to guest real or absolute memory.
* If DAT is on data will be copied to the address space as specified by
* the address space bits of the PSW:
- * Primary, secondory or home space (access register mode is currently not
- * implemented).
+ * Primary, secondary, home space or access register mode.
* The addressing mode of the PSW is also inspected, so that address wrap
* around is taken into account for 24-, 31- and 64-bit addressing mode,
* if the to be copied data crosses page boundaries in guest address space.
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 07/11] KVM: s390: Add MEMOP ioctls for reading/writing guest memory
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 06/11] KVM: s390: Add access register mode Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 08/11] KVM: s390: introduce post handlers for STSI Christian Borntraeger
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Thomas Huth, Christian Borntraeger
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On s390, we've got to make sure to hold the IPTE lock while accessing
logical memory. So let's add an ioctl for reading and writing logical
memory to provide this feature for userspace, too.
The maximum transfer size of this call is limited to 64kB to prevent
that the guest can trigger huge copy_from/to_user transfers. QEMU
currently only requests up to one or two pages so far, so 16*4kB seems
to be a reasonable limit here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 22 ++++++++++++
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 2 ++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 21 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 165 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index ee47998e..281179d 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -2716,6 +2716,52 @@ The fields in each entry are defined as follows:
eax, ebx, ecx, edx: the values returned by the cpuid instruction for
this function/index combination
+4.89 KVM_S390_MEM_OP
+
+Capability: KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP
+Architectures: s390
+Type: vcpu ioctl
+Parameters: struct kvm_s390_mem_op (in)
+Returns: = 0 on success,
+ < 0 on generic error (e.g. -EFAULT or -ENOMEM),
+ > 0 if an exception occurred while walking the page tables
+
+Read or write data from/to the logical (virtual) memory of a VPCU.
+
+Parameters are specified via the following structure:
+
+struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
+ __u64 gaddr; /* the guest address */
+ __u64 flags; /* flags */
+ __u32 size; /* amount of bytes */
+ __u32 op; /* type of operation */
+ __u64 buf; /* buffer in userspace */
+ __u8 ar; /* the access register number */
+ __u8 reserved[31]; /* should be set to 0 */
+};
+
+The type of operation is specified in the "op" field. It is either
+KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ for reading from logical memory space or
+KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE for writing to logical memory space. The
+KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY flag can be set in the "flags" field to check
+whether the corresponding memory access would create an access exception
+(without touching the data in the memory at the destination). In case an
+access exception occurred while walking the MMU tables of the guest, the
+ioctl returns a positive error number to indicate the type of exception.
+This exception is also raised directly at the corresponding VCPU if the
+flag KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION is set in the "flags" field.
+
+The start address of the memory region has to be specified in the "gaddr"
+field, and the length of the region in the "size" field. "buf" is the buffer
+supplied by the userspace application where the read data should be written
+to for KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ, or where the data that should be written
+is stored for a KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE. "buf" is unused and can be NULL
+when KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY is specified. "ar" designates the access
+register number to be used.
+
+The "reserved" field is meant for future extensions. It is not used by
+KVM with the currently defined set of flags.
+
5. The kvm_run structure
------------------------
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index ea38d71..a7559f7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -864,6 +864,28 @@ int guest_translate_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva, ar_t ar,
}
/**
+ * check_gva_range - test a range of guest virtual addresses for accessibility
+ */
+int check_gva_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva, ar_t ar,
+ unsigned long length, int is_write)
+{
+ unsigned long gpa;
+ unsigned long currlen;
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ ipte_lock(vcpu);
+ while (length > 0 && !rc) {
+ currlen = min(length, PAGE_SIZE - (gva % PAGE_SIZE));
+ rc = guest_translate_address(vcpu, gva, ar, &gpa, is_write);
+ gva += currlen;
+ length -= currlen;
+ }
+ ipte_unlock(vcpu);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+/**
* kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real - check for low-address protection
* @gra: Guest real address
*
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index 835e557..ef03726 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ int read_guest_lc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
int guest_translate_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva,
ar_t ar, unsigned long *gpa, int write);
+int check_gva_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva, ar_t ar,
+ unsigned long length, int is_write);
int access_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, ar_t ar, void *data,
unsigned long len, int write);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 610e90a..b7ecef9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/random.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
+#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
#include <asm/lowcore.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
@@ -38,6 +39,8 @@
#include "trace.h"
#include "trace-s390.h"
+#define MEM_OP_MAX_SIZE 65536 /* Maximum transfer size for KVM_S390_MEM_OP */
+
#define VCPU_STAT(x) offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, stat.x), KVM_STAT_VCPU
struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
@@ -177,6 +180,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_S390_USER_SIGP:
r = 1;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP:
+ r = MEM_OP_MAX_SIZE;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
@@ -2185,6 +2191,65 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return r;
}
+static long kvm_s390_guest_mem_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop)
+{
+ void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)mop->buf;
+ void *tmpbuf = NULL;
+ int r, srcu_idx;
+ const u64 supported_flags = KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION
+ | KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY;
+
+ if (mop->flags & ~supported_flags)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (mop->size > MEM_OP_MAX_SIZE)
+ return -E2BIG;
+
+ if (!(mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY)) {
+ tmpbuf = vmalloc(mop->size);
+ if (!tmpbuf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
+
+ switch (mop->op) {
+ case KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ:
+ if (mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY) {
+ r = check_gva_range(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, mop->size, false);
+ break;
+ }
+ r = read_guest(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, tmpbuf, mop->size);
+ if (r == 0) {
+ if (copy_to_user(uaddr, tmpbuf, mop->size))
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ }
+ break;
+ case KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE:
+ if (mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY) {
+ r = check_gva_range(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, mop->size, true);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (copy_from_user(tmpbuf, uaddr, mop->size)) {
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ break;
+ }
+ r = write_guest(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, tmpbuf, mop->size);
+ break;
+ default:
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
+
+ if (r > 0 && (mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION) != 0)
+ kvm_s390_inject_prog_irq(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.pgm);
+
+ vfree(tmpbuf);
+ return r;
+}
+
long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
{
@@ -2284,6 +2349,15 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(vcpu, &cap);
break;
}
+ case KVM_S390_MEM_OP: {
+ struct kvm_s390_mem_op mem_op;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&mem_op, argp, sizeof(mem_op)) == 0)
+ r = kvm_s390_guest_mem_op(vcpu, &mem_op);
+ else
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ break;
+ }
default:
r = -ENOTTY;
}
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 82634a4..0e16f2c 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -365,6 +365,24 @@ struct kvm_translation {
__u8 pad[5];
};
+/* for KVM_S390_MEM_OP */
+struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
+ /* in */
+ __u64 gaddr; /* the guest address */
+ __u64 flags; /* flags */
+ __u32 size; /* amount of bytes */
+ __u32 op; /* type of operation */
+ __u64 buf; /* buffer in userspace */
+ __u8 ar; /* the access register number */
+ __u8 reserved[31]; /* should be set to 0 */
+};
+/* types for kvm_s390_mem_op->op */
+#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ 0
+#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE 1
+/* flags for kvm_s390_mem_op->flags */
+#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY (1ULL << 0)
+#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION (1ULL << 1)
+
/* for KVM_INTERRUPT */
struct kvm_interrupt {
/* in */
@@ -761,6 +779,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
#define KVM_CAP_CHECK_EXTENSION_VM 105
#define KVM_CAP_S390_USER_SIGP 106
#define KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS 107
+#define KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP 108
#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
@@ -1136,6 +1155,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping {
#define KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT _IOW(KVMIO, 0xae, struct kvm_vcpu_init)
#define KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET _IOR(KVMIO, 0xaf, struct kvm_vcpu_init)
#define KVM_GET_REG_LIST _IOWR(KVMIO, 0xb0, struct kvm_reg_list)
+/* Available with KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP */
+#define KVM_S390_MEM_OP _IOW(KVMIO, 0xb1, struct kvm_s390_mem_op)
#define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU (1 << 0)
#define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_PCI_2_3 (1 << 1)
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 08/11] KVM: s390: introduce post handlers for STSI
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 07/11] KVM: s390: Add MEMOP ioctls for reading/writing guest memory Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 09/11] KVM: s390: Create ioctl for Getting/Setting guest storage keys Christian Borntraeger
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Ekaterina Tumanova,
Christian Borntraeger
From: Ekaterina Tumanova <tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The Store System Information (STSI) instruction currently collects all
information it relays to the caller in the kernel. Some information,
however, is only available in user space. An example of this is the
guest name: The kernel always sets "KVMGuest", but user space knows the
actual guest name.
This patch introduces a new exit, KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI, guarded by a
capability that can be enabled by user space if it wants to be able to
insert such data. User space will be provided with the target buffer
and the requested STSI function code.
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Tumanova <tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 5 +++++
arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 11 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index 281179d..c1fcb7a 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -3304,3 +3304,31 @@ Returns: 0 on success, negative value on error
Allows use of the vector registers introduced with z13 processor, and
provides for the synchronization between host and user space. Will
return -EINVAL if the machine does not support vectors.
+
+7.4 KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI
+
+Architectures: s390
+Parameters: none
+
+This capability allows post-handlers for the STSI instruction. After
+initial handling in the kernel, KVM exits to user space with
+KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI to allow user space to insert further data.
+
+Before exiting to userspace, kvm handlers should fill in s390_stsi field of
+vcpu->run:
+struct {
+ __u64 addr;
+ __u8 ar;
+ __u8 reserved;
+ __u8 fc;
+ __u8 sel1;
+ __u16 sel2;
+} s390_stsi;
+
+@addr - guest address of STSI SYSIB
+@fc - function code
+@sel1 - selector 1
+@sel2 - selector 2
+@ar - access register number
+
+KVM handlers should exit to userspace with rc = -EREMOTE.
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 347a333..2356a8c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -565,6 +565,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
int use_vectors;
int user_cpu_state_ctrl;
int user_sigp;
+ int user_stsi;
struct s390_io_adapter *adapters[MAX_S390_IO_ADAPTERS];
wait_queue_head_t ipte_wq;
int ipte_lock_count;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index b7ecef9..fdfa106 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_VM_ATTRIBUTES:
case KVM_CAP_MP_STATE:
case KVM_CAP_S390_USER_SIGP:
+ case KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI:
r = 1;
break;
case KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP:
@@ -280,6 +281,10 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enable_cap *cap)
kvm->arch.use_vectors = MACHINE_HAS_VX;
r = MACHINE_HAS_VX ? 0 : -EINVAL;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI:
+ kvm->arch.user_stsi = 1;
+ r = 0;
+ break;
default:
r = -EINVAL;
break;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index f4fe02e..5e4658d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -496,6 +496,17 @@ static void handle_stsi_3_2_2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sysinfo_3_2_2 *mem)
ASCEBC(mem->vm[0].cpi, 16);
}
+static void insert_stsi_usr_data(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, ar_t ar,
+ u8 fc, u8 sel1, u16 sel2)
+{
+ vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI;
+ vcpu->run->s390_stsi.addr = addr;
+ vcpu->run->s390_stsi.ar = ar;
+ vcpu->run->s390_stsi.fc = fc;
+ vcpu->run->s390_stsi.sel1 = sel1;
+ vcpu->run->s390_stsi.sel2 = sel2;
+}
+
static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int fc = (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] & 0xf0000000) >> 28;
@@ -556,11 +567,15 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
rc = kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
goto out;
}
+ if (vcpu->kvm->arch.user_stsi) {
+ insert_stsi_usr_data(vcpu, operand2, ar, fc, sel1, sel2);
+ rc = -EREMOTE;
+ }
trace_kvm_s390_handle_stsi(vcpu, fc, sel1, sel2, operand2);
free_page(mem);
kvm_s390_set_psw_cc(vcpu, 0);
vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] = 0;
- return 0;
+ return rc;
out_no_data:
kvm_s390_set_psw_cc(vcpu, 3);
out:
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 0e16f2c..57445ef 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ struct kvm_pit_config {
#define KVM_EXIT_S390_TSCH 22
#define KVM_EXIT_EPR 23
#define KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT 24
+#define KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI 25
/* For KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR */
/* Emulate instruction failed. */
@@ -309,6 +310,15 @@ struct kvm_run {
__u32 type;
__u64 flags;
} system_event;
+ /* KVM_EXIT_S390_STSI */
+ struct {
+ __u64 addr;
+ __u8 ar;
+ __u8 reserved;
+ __u8 fc;
+ __u8 sel1;
+ __u16 sel2;
+ } s390_stsi;
/* Fix the size of the union. */
char padding[256];
};
@@ -780,6 +790,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
#define KVM_CAP_S390_USER_SIGP 106
#define KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS 107
#define KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP 108
+#define KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI 109
#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 09/11] KVM: s390: Create ioctl for Getting/Setting guest storage keys
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 08/11] KVM: s390: introduce post handlers for STSI Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 10/11] KVM: s390: drop SIMD bit from kvm_s390_fac_list_mask Christian Borntraeger
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Jason J. Herne, Christian Borntraeger
From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Provide the KVM_S390_GET_SKEYS and KVM_S390_SET_SKEYS ioctl which can be used
to get/set guest storage keys. This functionality is needed for live migration
of s390 guests that use storage keys.
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 58 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 14 +++++
3 files changed, 195 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index c1fcb7a..0d7fc66 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -2762,6 +2762,64 @@ register number to be used.
The "reserved" field is meant for future extensions. It is not used by
KVM with the currently defined set of flags.
+4.90 KVM_S390_GET_SKEYS
+
+Capability: KVM_CAP_S390_SKEYS
+Architectures: s390
+Type: vm ioctl
+Parameters: struct kvm_s390_skeys
+Returns: 0 on success, KVM_S390_GET_KEYS_NONE if guest is not using storage
+ keys, negative value on error
+
+This ioctl is used to get guest storage key values on the s390
+architecture. The ioctl takes parameters via the kvm_s390_skeys struct.
+
+struct kvm_s390_skeys {
+ __u64 start_gfn;
+ __u64 count;
+ __u64 skeydata_addr;
+ __u32 flags;
+ __u32 reserved[9];
+};
+
+The start_gfn field is the number of the first guest frame whose storage keys
+you want to get.
+
+The count field is the number of consecutive frames (starting from start_gfn)
+whose storage keys to get. The count field must be at least 1 and the maximum
+allowed value is defined as KVM_S390_SKEYS_ALLOC_MAX. Values outside this range
+will cause the ioctl to return -EINVAL.
+
+The skeydata_addr field is the address to a buffer large enough to hold count
+bytes. This buffer will be filled with storage key data by the ioctl.
+
+4.91 KVM_S390_SET_SKEYS
+
+Capability: KVM_CAP_S390_SKEYS
+Architectures: s390
+Type: vm ioctl
+Parameters: struct kvm_s390_skeys
+Returns: 0 on success, negative value on error
+
+This ioctl is used to set guest storage key values on the s390
+architecture. The ioctl takes parameters via the kvm_s390_skeys struct.
+See section on KVM_S390_GET_SKEYS for struct definition.
+
+The start_gfn field is the number of the first guest frame whose storage keys
+you want to set.
+
+The count field is the number of consecutive frames (starting from start_gfn)
+whose storage keys to get. The count field must be at least 1 and the maximum
+allowed value is defined as KVM_S390_SKEYS_ALLOC_MAX. Values outside this range
+will cause the ioctl to return -EINVAL.
+
+The skeydata_addr field is the address to a buffer containing count bytes of
+storage keys. Each byte in the buffer will be set as the storage key for a
+single frame starting at start_gfn for count frames.
+
+Note: If any architecturally invalid key value is found in the given data then
+the ioctl will return -EINVAL.
+
5. The kvm_run structure
------------------------
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index fdfa106..0dc22ba 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MP_STATE:
case KVM_CAP_S390_USER_SIGP:
case KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI:
+ case KVM_CAP_S390_SKEYS:
r = 1;
break;
case KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP:
@@ -729,6 +730,108 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_has_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
return ret;
}
+static long kvm_s390_get_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
+{
+ uint8_t *keys;
+ uint64_t hva;
+ unsigned long curkey;
+ int i, r = 0;
+
+ if (args->flags != 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Is this guest using storage keys? */
+ if (!mm_use_skey(current->mm))
+ return KVM_S390_GET_SKEYS_NONE;
+
+ /* Enforce sane limit on memory allocation */
+ if (args->count < 1 || args->count > KVM_S390_SKEYS_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ keys = kmalloc_array(args->count, sizeof(uint8_t),
+ GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (!keys)
+ keys = vmalloc(sizeof(uint8_t) * args->count);
+ if (!keys)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < args->count; i++) {
+ hva = gfn_to_hva(kvm, args->start_gfn + i);
+ if (kvm_is_error_hva(hva)) {
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ curkey = get_guest_storage_key(current->mm, hva);
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(curkey)) {
+ r = curkey;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ keys[i] = curkey;
+ }
+
+ r = copy_to_user((uint8_t __user *)args->skeydata_addr, keys,
+ sizeof(uint8_t) * args->count);
+ if (r)
+ r = -EFAULT;
+out:
+ kvfree(keys);
+ return r;
+}
+
+static long kvm_s390_set_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
+{
+ uint8_t *keys;
+ uint64_t hva;
+ int i, r = 0;
+
+ if (args->flags != 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Enforce sane limit on memory allocation */
+ if (args->count < 1 || args->count > KVM_S390_SKEYS_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ keys = kmalloc_array(args->count, sizeof(uint8_t),
+ GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (!keys)
+ keys = vmalloc(sizeof(uint8_t) * args->count);
+ if (!keys)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ r = copy_from_user(keys, (uint8_t __user *)args->skeydata_addr,
+ sizeof(uint8_t) * args->count);
+ if (r) {
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Enable storage key handling for the guest */
+ s390_enable_skey();
+
+ for (i = 0; i < args->count; i++) {
+ hva = gfn_to_hva(kvm, args->start_gfn + i);
+ if (kvm_is_error_hva(hva)) {
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Lowest order bit is reserved */
+ if (keys[i] & 0x01) {
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ r = set_guest_storage_key(current->mm, hva,
+ (unsigned long)keys[i], 0);
+ if (r)
+ goto out;
+ }
+out:
+ kvfree(keys);
+ return r;
+}
+
long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
{
@@ -788,6 +891,26 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
r = kvm_s390_vm_has_attr(kvm, &attr);
break;
}
+ case KVM_S390_GET_SKEYS: {
+ struct kvm_s390_skeys args;
+
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ if (copy_from_user(&args, argp,
+ sizeof(struct kvm_s390_skeys)))
+ break;
+ r = kvm_s390_get_skeys(kvm, &args);
+ break;
+ }
+ case KVM_S390_SET_SKEYS: {
+ struct kvm_s390_skeys args;
+
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ if (copy_from_user(&args, argp,
+ sizeof(struct kvm_s390_skeys)))
+ break;
+ r = kvm_s390_set_skeys(kvm, &args);
+ break;
+ }
default:
r = -ENOTTY;
}
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 57445ef..1162ef7 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -147,6 +147,16 @@ struct kvm_pit_config {
#define KVM_PIT_SPEAKER_DUMMY 1
+struct kvm_s390_skeys {
+ __u64 start_gfn;
+ __u64 count;
+ __u64 skeydata_addr;
+ __u32 flags;
+ __u32 reserved[9];
+};
+#define KVM_S390_GET_SKEYS_NONE 1
+#define KVM_S390_SKEYS_MAX 1048576
+
#define KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN 0
#define KVM_EXIT_EXCEPTION 1
#define KVM_EXIT_IO 2
@@ -791,6 +801,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
#define KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS 107
#define KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP 108
#define KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI 109
+#define KVM_CAP_S390_SKEYS 110
#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
@@ -1168,6 +1179,9 @@ struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping {
#define KVM_GET_REG_LIST _IOWR(KVMIO, 0xb0, struct kvm_reg_list)
/* Available with KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP */
#define KVM_S390_MEM_OP _IOW(KVMIO, 0xb1, struct kvm_s390_mem_op)
+/* Available with KVM_CAP_S390_SKEYS */
+#define KVM_S390_GET_SKEYS _IOW(KVMIO, 0xb2, struct kvm_s390_skeys)
+#define KVM_S390_SET_SKEYS _IOW(KVMIO, 0xb3, struct kvm_s390_skeys)
#define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU (1 << 0)
#define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_PCI_2_3 (1 << 1)
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 10/11] KVM: s390: drop SIMD bit from kvm_s390_fac_list_mask
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 09/11] KVM: s390: Create ioctl for Getting/Setting guest storage keys Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 11/11] KVM: s390: represent SIMD cap in kvm facility Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-23 23:32 ` [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Marcelo Tosatti
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Michael Mueller, Christian Borntraeger
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Setting the SIMD bit in the KVM mask is an issue because it makes the
facility visible but not usable to the guest, thus it needs to be
removed again.
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 0dc22ba..42b8a25 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -107,7 +107,6 @@ struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_list_mask[] = {
0xff82fffbf4fc2000UL,
0x005c000000000000UL,
- 0x4000000000000000UL,
};
unsigned long kvm_s390_fac_list_mask_size(void)
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 11/11] KVM: s390: represent SIMD cap in kvm facility
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 10/11] KVM: s390: drop SIMD bit from kvm_s390_fac_list_mask Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-23 23:32 ` [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Marcelo Tosatti
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2015-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KVM
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcelo Tosatti, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck,
Jens Freimann, linux-s390, Michael Mueller, Christian Borntraeger
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The patch represents capability KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS by means
of the SIMD facility bit. This allows to a) disable the use of SIMD when
used in conjunction with a not-SIMD-aware QEMU, b) to enable SIMD when
used with a SIMD-aware version of QEMU and c) finally by means of a QEMU
version using the future cpu model ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 2356a8c..b8d1e97 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -562,7 +562,6 @@ struct kvm_arch{
int css_support;
int use_irqchip;
int use_cmma;
- int use_vectors;
int user_cpu_state_ctrl;
int user_sigp;
int user_stsi;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 42b8a25..9072127 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -278,8 +278,12 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enable_cap *cap)
r = 0;
break;
case KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS:
- kvm->arch.use_vectors = MACHINE_HAS_VX;
- r = MACHINE_HAS_VX ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+ if (MACHINE_HAS_VX) {
+ set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac->mask, 129);
+ set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac->list, 129);
+ r = 0;
+ } else
+ r = -EINVAL;
break;
case KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI:
kvm->arch.user_stsi = 1;
@@ -1084,7 +1088,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
kvm->arch.css_support = 0;
kvm->arch.use_irqchip = 0;
- kvm->arch.use_vectors = 0;
kvm->arch.epoch = 0;
spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
@@ -1186,12 +1189,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
{
save_fp_ctl(&vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc);
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors)
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129))
save_vx_regs((__vector128 *)&vcpu->arch.host_vregs->vrs);
else
save_fp_regs(vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fprs);
save_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors) {
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129)) {
restore_fp_ctl(&vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc);
restore_vx_regs((__vector128 *)&vcpu->run->s.regs.vrs);
} else {
@@ -1207,7 +1210,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
atomic_clear_mask(CPUSTAT_RUNNING, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpuflags);
gmap_disable(vcpu->arch.gmap);
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors) {
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129)) {
save_fp_ctl(&vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc);
save_vx_regs((__vector128 *)&vcpu->run->s.regs.vrs);
} else {
@@ -1216,7 +1219,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
save_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
restore_fp_ctl(&vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc);
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors)
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129))
restore_vx_regs((__vector128 *)&vcpu->arch.host_vregs->vrs);
else
restore_fp_regs(vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fprs);
@@ -1316,7 +1319,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= 1;
if (sclp_has_sigpif())
vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= 0x10000000U;
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors) {
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129)) {
vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= 0x00020000;
vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecd |= 0x20000000;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index 5d54191..c5aefef 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -149,6 +149,17 @@ static inline int test_kvm_facility(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long nr)
__test_facility(nr, kvm->arch.model.fac->list);
}
+static inline int set_kvm_facility(u64 *fac_list, unsigned long nr)
+{
+ unsigned char *ptr;
+
+ if (nr >= MAX_FACILITY_BIT)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ ptr = (unsigned char *) fac_list + (nr >> 3);
+ *ptr |= (0x80UL >> (nr & 7));
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* are cpu states controlled by user space */
static inline int kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(struct kvm *kvm)
{
--
2.3.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next)
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 11/11] KVM: s390: represent SIMD cap in kvm facility Christian Borntraeger
@ 2015-03-23 23:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2015-03-23 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: KVM, Paolo Bonzini, Alexander Graf, Cornelia Huck, Jens Freimann,
linux-s390
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:43:58PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Paolo, Marcelo,
>
> here is the followup pull request. As Marcelo has not yet pushed out
> queue or next to git.kernel.org, this request is based on the previous
> s390 pull request and should merge without conflicts.
>
> For details see tag description.
>
> Christian
>
> The following changes since commit 13211ea7b47db3d8ee2ff258a9a973a6d3aa3d43:
>
> KVM: s390: Enable vector support for capable guest (2015-03-06 13:49:35 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/kvm-s390-next-20150318
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 18280d8b4bcd4a2b174ee3cd748166c6190acacb:
>
> KVM: s390: represent SIMD cap in kvm facility (2015-03-17 16:33:14 +0100)
Pulled, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread