public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: Remove obsolete bust_spinlock() implementation
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:17:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181123021748.GB1582@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181122141529.14933-1-pmladek@suse.com>

On (11/22/18 15:15), Petr Mladek wrote:
> The commit cefc8be82403cf ("Consolidate bust_spinlocks()") kept
> the s390-specific implementation because of the absence of CONFIG_VT.
> In fact, the only difference was calling console_unblank() instead of
> unblank_screen().
> 
> The common implementation in lib/bust_spinlocks.c started to call
> unblank_screen() explicitly since the commit b61312d353da187
> ("oops handling: ensure that any oops is flushed to the mtdoops
> console").
> 
> As a result, the custom implementation is not longer necessary.
> And we could get all the other improvements of the common
> implementation for free.

I believe I sent a similar patch several weeks ago and it's
in s390 patch queue as of now, waiting for the next merge
window.

lkml.kernel.org/r/20181025081108.GB26561@osiris

	-ss

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-23  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-22 14:15 [PATCH] s390: Remove obsolete bust_spinlock() implementation Petr Mladek
2018-11-22 16:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-23  2:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-11-23  7:02   ` Heiko Carstens
2018-11-27  7:39     ` Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181123021748.GB1582@jagdpanzerIV \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox