From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 3/4] s390x: lib: add SPX and STPX instruction wrapper
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:16:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200109161625.154894-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200109161625.154894-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Add a wrapper for the SET PREFIX and STORE PREFIX instructions, and
use it instead of using inline assembly everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 10 ++++++++++
s390x/intercept.c | 33 +++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
index 1a5e3c6..465fe0f 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
@@ -284,4 +284,14 @@ static inline int servc(uint32_t command, unsigned long sccb)
return cc;
}
+static inline void spx(uint32_t *new_prefix)
+{
+ asm volatile("spx %0" : : "Q" (*new_prefix) : "memory");
+}
+
+static inline void stpx(uint32_t *current_prefix)
+{
+ asm volatile("stpx %0" : "=Q" (*current_prefix));
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/s390x/intercept.c b/s390x/intercept.c
index 3696e33..3b53633 100644
--- a/s390x/intercept.c
+++ b/s390x/intercept.c
@@ -26,27 +26,24 @@ static void test_stpx(void)
uint32_t new_prefix = (uint32_t)(intptr_t)pagebuf;
/* Can we successfully change the prefix? */
- asm volatile (
- " stpx %0\n"
- " spx %2\n"
- " stpx %1\n"
- " spx %0\n"
- : "+Q"(old_prefix), "+Q"(tst_prefix)
- : "Q"(new_prefix));
+ stpx(&old_prefix);
+ spx(&new_prefix);
+ stpx(&tst_prefix);
+ spx(&old_prefix);
report(old_prefix == 0 && tst_prefix == new_prefix, "store prefix");
expect_pgm_int();
low_prot_enable();
- asm volatile(" stpx 0(%0) " : : "r"(8));
+ stpx((void *)8L);
low_prot_disable();
check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
expect_pgm_int();
- asm volatile(" stpx 0(%0) " : : "r"(1));
+ stpx((void *)1L);
check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
expect_pgm_int();
- asm volatile(" stpx 0(%0) " : : "r"(-8L));
+ stpx((void *)-8L);
check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_ADDRESSING);
}
@@ -63,22 +60,18 @@ static void test_spx(void)
* some facility bits there ... at least some of them should be
* set in our buffer afterwards.
*/
- asm volatile (
- " stpx %0\n"
- " spx %1\n"
- " stfl 0\n"
- " spx %0\n"
- : "+Q"(old_prefix)
- : "Q"(new_prefix)
- : "memory");
+ stpx(&old_prefix);
+ spx(&new_prefix);
+ asm volatile (" stfl 0" : : : "memory");
+ spx(&old_prefix);
report(pagebuf[GEN_LC_STFL] != 0, "stfl to new prefix");
expect_pgm_int();
- asm volatile(" spx 0(%0) " : : "r"(1));
+ spx((void *)1L);
check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
expect_pgm_int();
- asm volatile(" spx 0(%0) " : : "r"(-8L));
+ spx((void *)-8L);
check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_ADDRESSING);
}
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-09 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-09 16:16 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 0/4] s390x: SCLP Unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-09 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 1/4] s390x: export sclp_setup_int Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-09 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 2/4] s390x: sclp: add service call instruction wrapper Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-09 16:16 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2020-01-09 16:43 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 3/4] s390x: lib: add SPX and STPX " Thomas Huth
2020-01-09 16:50 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-09 16:58 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-09 17:05 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-09 17:13 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-09 17:27 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-09 17:09 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-09 16:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 4/4] s390x: SCLP unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-09 17:44 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-09 18:00 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200109161625.154894-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox