From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] s390x/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:12:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207101220.2d057f18.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200206213825.11444-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 22:38:16 +0100
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Here is a new pass at the channel-path handling code for vfio-ccw.
> This was initially developed by Farhan Ali this past summer, and
> picked up by me. For my own benefit/sanity, I made a small changelog
> in the commit message for each patch, describing the changes I've
> made to his original code beyond just rebasing to master, rather than
> a giant list appended here.
>
> I had been encountering a host crash which I think was triggered by
> this code rather than existing within it. I'd sent a potential fix
> for that separately, but need more diagnosis. So while that is
> outstanding, I think I've gotten most (but probably not all) comments
> from v1 addressed within.
>
> With this, and the corresponding QEMU series (to be posted momentarily),
> applied I am able to configure off/on a CHPID (for example, by issuing
> "chchp -c 0/1 xx" on the host), and the guest is able to see both the
> events and reflect the updated path masks in its structures.
>
> For reasons that are hopefully obvious, issuing chchp within the guest
> only works for the logical vary. Configuring it off/on does not work,
> which I think is fine.
Before I delve into this: While the basic architecture here (and in the
QEMU part) is still similar, you changed things like handling multiple
CRWs? That's at least the impression I got from a very high-level skim.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20191115025620.19593-1-farman@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Eric Farman (4):
> vfio-ccw: Refactor the unregister of the async regions
> vfio-ccw: Refactor IRQ handlers
> vfio-ccw: Add trace for CRW event
> vfio-ccw: Remove inline get_schid() routine
>
> Farhan Ali (5):
> vfio-ccw: Introduce new helper functions to free/destroy regions
> vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw
> vfio-ccw: Introduce a new schib region
> vfio-ccw: Introduce a new CRW region
> vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and CRW region
>
> Documentation/s390/vfio-ccw.rst | 31 ++++-
> drivers/s390/cio/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 8 +-
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 65 +++++++---
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 16 +++
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_trace.c | 1 +
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_trace.h | 30 +++++
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 3 +
> include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h | 19 +++
> 11 files changed, 463 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 21:38 [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] s390x/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling Eric Farman
2020-02-06 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/9] vfio-ccw: Introduce new helper functions to free/destroy regions Eric Farman
2020-02-06 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/9] vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw Eric Farman
2020-02-14 12:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-14 16:35 ` Eric Farman
2020-03-24 15:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-03-26 2:09 ` Eric Farman
2020-03-26 6:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-03-26 11:54 ` Eric Farman
2020-02-06 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/9] vfio-ccw: Refactor the unregister of the async regions Eric Farman
2020-02-06 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/9] vfio-ccw: Introduce a new schib region Eric Farman
2020-02-14 12:32 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-14 14:29 ` Eric Farman
2020-02-06 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/9] vfio-ccw: Introduce a new CRW region Eric Farman
2020-04-06 13:40 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-06 21:43 ` Eric Farman
2020-04-07 6:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-06 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/9] vfio-ccw: Refactor IRQ handlers Eric Farman
2020-02-06 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/9] vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and CRW region Eric Farman
2020-02-14 13:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-14 16:24 ` Eric Farman
2020-03-24 16:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-03-26 18:51 ` Eric Farman
2020-04-06 13:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-06 22:11 ` Eric Farman
2020-02-06 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/9] vfio-ccw: Add trace for CRW event Eric Farman
2020-02-06 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 9/9] vfio-ccw: Remove inline get_schid() routine Eric Farman
2020-02-14 13:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-14 14:27 ` Eric Farman
2020-02-07 9:12 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-02-07 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] s390x/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling Eric Farman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200207101220.2d057f18.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox