From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 5/9] s390/qeth: tighten ucast IP locking
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:36:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200923083700.44624-6-jwi@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200923083700.44624-1-jwi@linux.ibm.com>
The programming of ucast IPs via qeth_l3_modify_ip() is driven
independently from any of our typical locking mechanisms (eg. detaching
the netdevice, or holding the conf_mutex).
So when we inspect the card state to check whether the required cmd IO
should be deferred, there is no protection against concurrent state
changes.
But by slightly re-ordering the teardown sequence, we can rely on the
ip_lock to sufficiently serialize things:
1. when running concurrently to qeth_l3_set_online(), any instance of
qeth_l3_modify_ip() that aquires the ip_lock _after_
qeth_l3_recover_ip() will observe the state as CARD_STATE_SOFTSETUP
and not defer the IO.
2. when running concurrently to qeth_l3_set_offline(), any instance of
qeth_l3_modify_ip() that aquires the ip_lock _after_
qeth_l3_clear_ip_htable() will observe the state as CARD_STATE_DOWN
and defer the IO.
These guarantees in mind, we can now drop the conf_mutex from the
qeth_l3_modify_rxip_vipa() wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
index 876a21d451f5..0815b64c9797 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -591,7 +591,6 @@ int qeth_l3_modify_rxip_vipa(struct qeth_card *card, bool add, const u8 *ip,
enum qeth_prot_versions proto)
{
struct qeth_ipaddr addr;
- int rc;
qeth_l3_init_ipaddr(&addr, type, proto);
if (proto == QETH_PROT_IPV4)
@@ -599,11 +598,7 @@ int qeth_l3_modify_rxip_vipa(struct qeth_card *card, bool add, const u8 *ip,
else
memcpy(&addr.u.a6.addr, ip, 16);
- mutex_lock(&card->conf_mutex);
- rc = qeth_l3_modify_ip(card, &addr, add);
- mutex_unlock(&card->conf_mutex);
-
- return rc;
+ return qeth_l3_modify_ip(card, &addr, add);
}
int qeth_l3_modify_hsuid(struct qeth_card *card, bool add)
@@ -1161,9 +1156,9 @@ static void qeth_l3_stop_card(struct qeth_card *card)
qeth_diags_trace(card, QETH_DIAGS_CMD_TRACE_DISABLE);
if (card->state == CARD_STATE_SOFTSETUP) {
+ card->state = CARD_STATE_DOWN;
qeth_l3_clear_ip_htable(card, 1);
qeth_clear_ipacmd_list(card);
- card->state = CARD_STATE_DOWN;
}
qeth_qdio_clear_card(card, 0);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 8:36 [PATCH net-next 0/9] s390/qeth: updates 2020-09-23 Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] s390/qeth: don't init refcount twice for mcast IPs Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] s390/qeth: relax locking for ipato config data Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] s390/qeth: clean up string ops in qeth_l3_parse_ipatoe() Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 9:55 ` David Laight
2020-09-23 10:43 ` Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] s390/qeth: replace deprecated simple_stroul() Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` Julian Wiedmann [this message]
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] s390/qeth: cancel cmds earlier during teardown Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] s390/qeth: consolidate online code Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] s390/qeth: consolidate teardown code Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:37 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] s390/qeth: remove forward declarations in L2 code Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 19:08 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] s390/qeth: updates 2020-09-23 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200923083700.44624-6-jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox