From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/9] s390/qeth: clean up string ops in qeth_l3_parse_ipatoe()
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:43:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32389826-0c77-cade-5105-a5b710276e42@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e439abb31e942e2a441f28439d287fa@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On 23.09.20 12:55, David Laight wrote:
> From: Julian Wiedmann
>> Sent: 23 September 2020 09:37
>>
>> Indicate the max number of to-be-parsed characters, and avoid copying
>> the address sub-string.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c
>> index ca9c95b6bf35..05fa986e30fc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c
>> @@ -409,21 +409,22 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_ipato_add4_show(struct device *dev,
>> static int qeth_l3_parse_ipatoe(const char *buf, enum qeth_prot_versions proto,
>> u8 *addr, int *mask_bits)
>> {
>> - const char *start, *end;
>> - char *tmp;
>> - char buffer[40] = {0, };
>> + const char *start;
>> + char *sep, *tmp;
>> + int rc;
>>
>> - start = buf;
>> - /* get address string */
>> - end = strchr(start, '/');
>> - if (!end || (end - start >= 40)) {
>> + /* Expected input pattern: %addr/%mask */
>> + sep = strnchr(buf, 40, '/');
>> + if (!sep)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> - strncpy(buffer, start, end - start);
>> - if (qeth_l3_string_to_ipaddr(buffer, proto, addr)) {
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> - start = end + 1;
>> +
>> + /* Terminate the %addr sub-string, and parse it: */
>> + *sep = '\0';
>
> Is it valid to write into the input buffer here?
>
It's a private buffer that was handed to us by the kernfs write code.
>> + rc = qeth_l3_string_to_ipaddr(buf, proto, addr);
>> + if (rc)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + start = sep + 1;
>> *mask_bits = simple_strtoul(start, &tmp, 10);
>
> The use of strnchr() rather implies that the input
> buffer may not be '\0' terminated.
It's a kernfs write buffer, so guaranteed to be terminated.
> If that is true then you've just run off the end of the
> input buffer.
>
>> if (!strlen(start) ||
>> (tmp == start) ||
>
> Hmmm... delete the strlen() clause.
> It ought to test start[0], but the 'tmp == start' test
> covers that case.
>
See the next patch in this series, all this goes away.
> I don't understand why simple_strtoul() is deprecated.
> I don't recall any of the replacements returning the
> address of the terminating character.
>
> David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
>
b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 8:36 [PATCH net-next 0/9] s390/qeth: updates 2020-09-23 Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] s390/qeth: don't init refcount twice for mcast IPs Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] s390/qeth: relax locking for ipato config data Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] s390/qeth: clean up string ops in qeth_l3_parse_ipatoe() Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 9:55 ` David Laight
2020-09-23 10:43 ` Julian Wiedmann [this message]
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] s390/qeth: replace deprecated simple_stroul() Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] s390/qeth: tighten ucast IP locking Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] s390/qeth: cancel cmds earlier during teardown Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] s390/qeth: consolidate online code Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:36 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] s390/qeth: consolidate teardown code Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 8:37 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] s390/qeth: remove forward declarations in L2 code Julian Wiedmann
2020-09-23 19:08 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] s390/qeth: updates 2020-09-23 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32389826-0c77-cade-5105-a5b710276e42@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox