public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI: Rework pci_scan_slot() and isolated PCI functions
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 12:27:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220419102803.3430139-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi Bjorn, Hi Jan,

In an earlier version[0], I sought to apply the existing jailhouse special case
for isolated PCI functions to s390. As Bjorn noted in[1] there appears to be
some potential for cleaning things up and removing duplication though.

This series attempts to do this cleanup (Patches 1 and 2) followed by enabling
isolated PCI functions for s390 (Patches 3 and 4). If need be I can of course
split the cleanup off but for now I kept it as one as that's what I have
been testing.

Thanks,
Niklas

Changes v2 -> v3:
- Removed now unused nr_devs variable (kernel test robot)

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220404095346.2324666-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220408224514.GA353445@bhelgaas/
 
Niklas Schnelle (4):
  PCI: Clean up pci_scan_slot()
  PCI: Move jailhouse's isolated function handling to pci_scan_slot()
  PCI: Extend isolated function probing to s390
  s390/pci: allow zPCI zbus without a function zero

 arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c    | 82 ++++++++++----------------------------
 drivers/pci/probe.c        | 63 +++++++++++------------------
 include/linux/hypervisor.h |  9 +++++
 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)

-- 
2.32.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-19 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-19 10:27 Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2022-04-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: Clean up pci_scan_slot() Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-21  2:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-21  9:27     ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-21 11:14       ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-21 17:09       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-22 11:16         ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: Move jailhouse's isolated function handling to pci_scan_slot() Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI: Extend isolated function probing to s390 Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] s390/pci: allow zPCI zbus without a function zero Niklas Schnelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220419102803.3430139-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox