From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: Move jailhouse's isolated function handling to pci_scan_slot()
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 12:28:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220419102803.3430139-3-schnelle@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220419102803.3430139-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
The special case of the jailhouse hypervisor passing through individual
PCI functions handles scanning for PCI functions even if function 0 does
not exist. Currently this is done with an extra loop duplicating the one
in pci_scan_slot(). By incorporating the check for jailhouse_paravirt()
into next_fn() we can instead do this as part of the normal
pci_scan_slot(). The only functional change is that we now call
pcie_aspm_init_link_state() for these functions but this already
happened if function 0 was passed through and should not be a problem.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220408224514.GA353445@bhelgaas/
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 28 +++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 389aa1f9cb2c..a1e8f1e14c3d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -2602,10 +2602,11 @@ static int next_fn(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, int fn)
if (dev && !dev->multifunction)
return -ENODEV;
/*
- * A function 0 is required but multifunction devices may
- * be non-contiguous so dev can be NULL otherwise.
+ * Usually a function 0 is required but the jailhouse hypervisor may
+ * pass individual functions. For non-contiguous multifunction devices
+ * some functions may also be missing.
*/
- if (!fn && !dev)
+ if (!fn && !dev && !jailhouse_paravirt())
return -ENODEV;
return (fn <= 6) ? fn + 1 : -ENODEV;
}
@@ -2855,29 +2856,14 @@ static unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus_extend(struct pci_bus *bus,
{
unsigned int used_buses, normal_bridges = 0, hotplug_bridges = 0;
unsigned int start = bus->busn_res.start;
- unsigned int devfn, fn, cmax, max = start;
+ unsigned int devfn, cmax, max = start;
struct pci_dev *dev;
- int nr_devs;
dev_dbg(&bus->dev, "scanning bus\n");
/* Go find them, Rover! */
- for (devfn = 0; devfn < 256; devfn += 8) {
- nr_devs = pci_scan_slot(bus, devfn);
-
- /*
- * The Jailhouse hypervisor may pass individual functions of a
- * multi-function device to a guest without passing function 0.
- * Look for them as well.
- */
- if (jailhouse_paravirt() && nr_devs == 0) {
- for (fn = 1; fn < 8; fn++) {
- dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn + fn);
- if (dev)
- dev->multifunction = 1;
- }
- }
- }
+ for (devfn = 0; devfn < 256; devfn += 8)
+ pci_scan_slot(bus, devfn);
/* Reserve buses for SR-IOV capability */
used_buses = pci_iov_bus_range(bus);
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-19 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-19 10:27 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI: Rework pci_scan_slot() and isolated PCI functions Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: Clean up pci_scan_slot() Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-21 2:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-21 9:27 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-21 11:14 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-21 17:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-22 11:16 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-19 10:28 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2022-04-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI: Extend isolated function probing to s390 Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] s390/pci: allow zPCI zbus without a function zero Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220419102803.3430139-3-schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox