public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] iommu/s390: Use RCU to allow concurrent domain_list iteration
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:51:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221018145132.998866-4-schnelle@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018145132.998866-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>

The s390_domain->devices list is only added to when new devices are
attached but is iterated through in read-only fashion for every mapping
operation as well as for I/O TLB flushes and thus in performance
critical code causing contention on the s390_domain->list_lock.
Fortunately such a read-mostly linked list is a standard use case for
RCU. This change closely follows the example fpr RCU protected list
given in Documentation/RCU/listRCU.rst.

Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h |  1 +
 arch/s390/pci/pci.c         |  2 +-
 drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c  | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
index 07361e2fd8c5..e4c3e4e04d30 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct zpci_dev {
 	struct list_head entry;		/* list of all zpci_devices, needed for hotplug, etc. */
 	struct list_head iommu_list;
 	struct kref kref;
+	struct rcu_head rcu;
 	struct hotplug_slot hotplug_slot;
 
 	enum zpci_state state;
diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
index a703dcd94a68..ef38b1514c77 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ void zpci_release_device(struct kref *kref)
 		break;
 	}
 	zpci_dbg(3, "rem fid:%x\n", zdev->fid);
-	kfree(zdev);
+	kfree_rcu(zdev, rcu);
 }
 
 int zpci_report_error(struct pci_dev *pdev,
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
index a4c2e9bc6d83..4e90987be387 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <linux/iommu.h>
 #include <linux/iommu-helper.h>
 #include <linux/sizes.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <asm/pci_dma.h>
 
 static const struct iommu_ops s390_iommu_ops;
@@ -61,7 +63,7 @@ static struct iommu_domain *s390_domain_alloc(unsigned domain_type)
 
 	spin_lock_init(&s390_domain->dma_table_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&s390_domain->list_lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s390_domain->devices);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&s390_domain->devices);
 
 	return &s390_domain->domain;
 }
@@ -70,7 +72,9 @@ static void s390_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
 {
 	struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&s390_domain->devices));
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	dma_cleanup_tables(s390_domain->dma_table);
 	kfree(s390_domain);
 }
@@ -84,7 +88,7 @@ static void __s390_iommu_detach_device(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
-	list_del_init(&zdev->iommu_list);
+	list_del_rcu(&zdev->iommu_list);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
 
 	zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
@@ -127,7 +131,7 @@ static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 	zdev->s390_domain = s390_domain;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
-	list_add(&zdev->iommu_list, &s390_domain->devices);
+	list_add_rcu(&zdev->iommu_list, &s390_domain->devices);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -203,17 +207,16 @@ static void s390_iommu_flush_iotlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
 {
 	struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
 	struct zpci_dev *zdev;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int rc;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
 		rc = zpci_refresh_trans((u64)zdev->fh << 32, zdev->start_dma,
 					zdev->end_dma - zdev->start_dma + 1);
 		if (rc)
 			break;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static void s390_iommu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain,
@@ -222,21 +225,20 @@ static void s390_iommu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 	struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
 	size_t size = gather->end - gather->start + 1;
 	struct zpci_dev *zdev;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int rc;
 
 	/* If gather was never added to there is nothing to flush */
 	if (gather->start == ULONG_MAX)
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
 		rc = zpci_refresh_trans((u64)zdev->fh << 32, gather->start,
 					size);
 		if (rc)
 			break;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static void s390_iommu_iotlb_sync_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
@@ -244,11 +246,10 @@ static void s390_iommu_iotlb_sync_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 {
 	struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
 	struct zpci_dev *zdev;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int rc;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
 		if (!zdev->tlb_refresh)
 			continue;
 		rc = zpci_refresh_trans((u64)zdev->fh << 32,
@@ -256,7 +257,7 @@ static void s390_iommu_iotlb_sync_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 		if (rc)
 			break;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static int s390_iommu_update_trans(struct s390_domain *s390_domain,
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-18 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-18 14:51 [PATCH 0/5] iommu/s390: Further improvements Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/s390: Make attach succeed even if the device is in error state Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-28 15:55   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/s390: Add I/O TLB ops Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-28 16:03   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-31 16:11     ` Robin Murphy
2022-11-02 10:51       ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-18 14:51 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2022-10-18 15:18   ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/s390: Use RCU to allow concurrent domain_list iteration Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-19  8:31     ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-19 11:53       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-20  8:51         ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-20 11:05           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-21 12:08             ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-21 13:36               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-21 15:01                 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-21 15:04                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-24 15:22                     ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-24 16:26                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-27 12:44                         ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-27 12:56                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-27 13:35                             ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-27 14:03                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-28  9:29                                 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-28 11:28                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-21 15:05                   ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] iommu/s390: Optimize IOMMU table walking Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] s390/pci: use lock-free I/O translation updates Niklas Schnelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221018145132.998866-4-schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox