From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] iommu/s390: Use RCU to allow concurrent domain_list iteration
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:05:20 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1ErcEe82yjJI+ET@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3551bb461b3ef3cfc1a0c644093816be1835b3f.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:51:10AM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> Ok that makes sense thanks for the explanation. So yes my assessment is
> still that in this situation the IOTLB flush is architected to return
> an error that we can ignore. Not the most elegant I admit but at least
> it's simple. Alternatively I guess we could use call_rcu() to do the
> zpci_unregister_ioat() but I'm not sure how to then make sure that a
> subsequent zpci_register_ioat() only happens after that without adding
> too much more logic.
This won't work either as the domain could have been freed before the
call_rcu() happens, the domain needs to be detached synchronously
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-20 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 14:51 [PATCH 0/5] iommu/s390: Further improvements Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/s390: Make attach succeed even if the device is in error state Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-28 15:55 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/s390: Add I/O TLB ops Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-28 16:03 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-10-31 16:11 ` Robin Murphy
2022-11-02 10:51 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/s390: Use RCU to allow concurrent domain_list iteration Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-18 15:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-19 8:31 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-19 11:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-20 8:51 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-20 11:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-10-21 12:08 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-21 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-21 15:01 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-21 15:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-24 15:22 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-24 16:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-27 12:44 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-27 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-27 13:35 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-27 14:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-28 9:29 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-28 11:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-21 15:05 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] iommu/s390: Optimize IOMMU table walking Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] s390/pci: use lock-free I/O translation updates Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1ErcEe82yjJI+ET@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox