From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
yi.l.liu@intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com, peterx@redhat.com,
jasowang@redhat.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
lulu@redhat.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
xudong.hao@intel.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com,
terrence.xu@intel.com, yanting.jiang@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 05/25] kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device fd
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 08:18:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230401151833.124749-6-yi.l.liu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230401151833.124749-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Meanwhile, rename related helpers. No functional change is intended.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
virt/kvm/vfio.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/vfio.c b/virt/kvm/vfio.c
index 8bac308ba630..857d6ba349e1 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/vfio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/vfio.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include <asm/kvm_ppc.h>
#endif
-struct kvm_vfio_group {
+struct kvm_vfio_file {
struct list_head node;
struct file *file;
#ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct kvm_vfio_group {
};
struct kvm_vfio {
- struct list_head group_list;
+ struct list_head file_list;
struct mutex lock;
bool noncoherent;
};
@@ -98,34 +98,35 @@ static struct iommu_group *kvm_vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
}
static void kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg)
+ struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf)
{
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvg->iommu_group))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvf->iommu_group))
return;
- kvm_spapr_tce_release_iommu_group(kvm, kvg->iommu_group);
- iommu_group_put(kvg->iommu_group);
- kvg->iommu_group = NULL;
+ kvm_spapr_tce_release_iommu_group(kvm, kvf->iommu_group);
+ iommu_group_put(kvf->iommu_group);
+ kvf->iommu_group = NULL;
}
#endif
/*
- * Groups can use the same or different IOMMU domains. If the same then
- * adding a new group may change the coherency of groups we've previously
- * been told about. We don't want to care about any of that so we retest
- * each group and bail as soon as we find one that's noncoherent. This
- * means we only ever [un]register_noncoherent_dma once for the whole device.
+ * Groups/devices can use the same or different IOMMU domains. If the same
+ * then adding a new group/device may change the coherency of groups/devices
+ * we've previously been told about. We don't want to care about any of
+ * that so we retest each group/device and bail as soon as we find one that's
+ * noncoherent. This means we only ever [un]register_noncoherent_dma once
+ * for the whole device.
*/
static void kvm_vfio_update_coherency(struct kvm_device *dev)
{
struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
bool noncoherent = false;
- struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg;
+ struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf;
mutex_lock(&kv->lock);
- list_for_each_entry(kvg, &kv->group_list, node) {
- if (!kvm_vfio_file_enforced_coherent(kvg->file)) {
+ list_for_each_entry(kvf, &kv->file_list, node) {
+ if (!kvm_vfio_file_enforced_coherent(kvf->file)) {
noncoherent = true;
break;
}
@@ -143,10 +144,10 @@ static void kvm_vfio_update_coherency(struct kvm_device *dev)
mutex_unlock(&kv->lock);
}
-static int kvm_vfio_group_add(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
+static int kvm_vfio_file_add(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
{
struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
- struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg;
+ struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf;
struct file *filp;
int ret;
@@ -162,27 +163,27 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_add(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
mutex_lock(&kv->lock);
- list_for_each_entry(kvg, &kv->group_list, node) {
- if (kvg->file == filp) {
+ list_for_each_entry(kvf, &kv->file_list, node) {
+ if (kvf->file == filp) {
ret = -EEXIST;
goto err_unlock;
}
}
- kvg = kzalloc(sizeof(*kvg), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
- if (!kvg) {
+ kvf = kzalloc(sizeof(*kvf), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ if (!kvf) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_unlock;
}
- kvg->file = filp;
- list_add_tail(&kvg->node, &kv->group_list);
+ kvf->file = filp;
+ list_add_tail(&kvf->node, &kv->file_list);
kvm_arch_start_assignment(dev->kvm);
mutex_unlock(&kv->lock);
- kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvg->file, dev->kvm);
+ kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvf->file, dev->kvm);
kvm_vfio_update_coherency(dev);
return 0;
@@ -193,10 +194,10 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_add(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
return ret;
}
-static int kvm_vfio_group_del(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
+static int kvm_vfio_file_del(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
{
struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
- struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg;
+ struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf;
struct fd f;
int ret;
@@ -208,18 +209,18 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_del(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
mutex_lock(&kv->lock);
- list_for_each_entry(kvg, &kv->group_list, node) {
- if (kvg->file != f.file)
+ list_for_each_entry(kvf, &kv->file_list, node) {
+ if (kvf->file != f.file)
continue;
- list_del(&kvg->node);
+ list_del(&kvf->node);
kvm_arch_end_assignment(dev->kvm);
#ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
- kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(dev->kvm, kvg);
+ kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(dev->kvm, kvf);
#endif
- kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvg->file, NULL);
- fput(kvg->file);
- kfree(kvg);
+ kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvf->file, NULL);
+ fput(kvf->file);
+ kfree(kvf);
ret = 0;
break;
}
@@ -234,12 +235,12 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_del(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
-static int kvm_vfio_group_set_spapr_tce(struct kvm_device *dev,
- void __user *arg)
+static int kvm_vfio_file_set_spapr_tce(struct kvm_device *dev,
+ void __user *arg)
{
struct kvm_vfio_spapr_tce param;
struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
- struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg;
+ struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf;
struct fd f;
int ret;
@@ -254,20 +255,20 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_set_spapr_tce(struct kvm_device *dev,
mutex_lock(&kv->lock);
- list_for_each_entry(kvg, &kv->group_list, node) {
- if (kvg->file != f.file)
+ list_for_each_entry(kvf, &kv->file_list, node) {
+ if (kvf->file != f.file)
continue;
- if (!kvg->iommu_group) {
- kvg->iommu_group = kvm_vfio_file_iommu_group(kvg->file);
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvg->iommu_group)) {
+ if (!kvf->iommu_group) {
+ kvf->iommu_group = kvm_vfio_file_iommu_group(kvf->file);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvf->iommu_group)) {
ret = -EIO;
goto err_fdput;
}
}
ret = kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group(dev->kvm, param.tablefd,
- kvg->iommu_group);
+ kvf->iommu_group);
break;
}
@@ -278,8 +279,8 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_set_spapr_tce(struct kvm_device *dev,
}
#endif
-static int kvm_vfio_set_group(struct kvm_device *dev, long attr,
- void __user *arg)
+static int kvm_vfio_set_file(struct kvm_device *dev, long attr,
+ void __user *arg)
{
int32_t __user *argp = arg;
int32_t fd;
@@ -288,16 +289,16 @@ static int kvm_vfio_set_group(struct kvm_device *dev, long attr,
case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD:
if (get_user(fd, argp))
return -EFAULT;
- return kvm_vfio_group_add(dev, fd);
+ return kvm_vfio_file_add(dev, fd);
case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL:
if (get_user(fd, argp))
return -EFAULT;
- return kvm_vfio_group_del(dev, fd);
+ return kvm_vfio_file_del(dev, fd);
#ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_SET_SPAPR_TCE:
- return kvm_vfio_group_set_spapr_tce(dev, arg);
+ return kvm_vfio_file_set_spapr_tce(dev, arg);
#endif
}
@@ -309,8 +310,8 @@ static int kvm_vfio_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
{
switch (attr->group) {
case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP:
- return kvm_vfio_set_group(dev, attr->attr,
- u64_to_user_ptr(attr->addr));
+ return kvm_vfio_set_file(dev, attr->attr,
+ u64_to_user_ptr(attr->addr));
}
return -ENXIO;
@@ -339,16 +340,16 @@ static int kvm_vfio_has_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
static void kvm_vfio_release(struct kvm_device *dev)
{
struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
- struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg, *tmp;
+ struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf, *tmp;
- list_for_each_entry_safe(kvg, tmp, &kv->group_list, node) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(kvf, tmp, &kv->file_list, node) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
- kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(dev->kvm, kvg);
+ kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(dev->kvm, kvf);
#endif
- kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvg->file, NULL);
- fput(kvg->file);
- list_del(&kvg->node);
- kfree(kvg);
+ kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvf->file, NULL);
+ fput(kvf->file);
+ list_del(&kvf->node);
+ kfree(kvf);
kvm_arch_end_assignment(dev->kvm);
}
@@ -382,7 +383,7 @@ static int kvm_vfio_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
if (!kv)
return -ENOMEM;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kv->group_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kv->file_list);
mutex_init(&kv->lock);
dev->private = kv;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-01 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-01 15:18 [PATCH v9 00/25] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 01/25] vfio: Allocate per device file structure Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 02/25] vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 03/25] vfio: Remove vfio_file_is_group() Yi Liu
2023-04-05 12:20 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 04/25] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI Yi Liu
2023-04-05 17:58 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 06/25] kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace Yi Liu
2023-04-06 9:46 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-06 10:49 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-06 18:57 ` Alex Williamson
2023-04-07 3:42 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-07 8:56 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-07 10:23 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 07/25] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close() Yi Liu
2023-04-06 12:43 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 08/25] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened Yi Liu
2023-04-06 14:08 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 09/25] vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group Yi Liu
2023-04-06 14:13 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 10/25] vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path Yi Liu
2023-04-06 16:44 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-07 9:48 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-07 10:18 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 11/25] vfio: Make vfio_device_first_open() to accept NULL iommufd for noiommu Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 12/25] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu support out of vfio_iommufd_bind() Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 13/25] vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 14/25] vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 15/25] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 16/25] iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API Yi Liu
2023-04-04 22:45 ` Alex Williamson
2023-04-05 11:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-04-05 14:10 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-05 14:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-04-05 14:46 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 17/25] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 18/25] vfio: Determine noiommu in vfio_device registration Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 19/25] vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 20/25] vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in unregister Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 21/25] vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 22/25] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 23/25] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 24/25] vfio: Compile group optionally Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 25/25] docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description Yi Liu
2023-04-05 13:45 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-05 14:00 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-05 16:58 ` Alex Williamson
2023-04-07 8:44 ` Liu, Yi L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230401151833.124749-6-yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=terrence.xu@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yanting.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox